Omentum Preservation Versus Complete Omentectomy in Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

654 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2031-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Curative therapy for gastric cancer usually consists of perioperative chemotherapy and a radical (R0) gastrectomy. A radical resection includes a modified D2 lymphadenectomy, and, generally, a complete omentectomy, to ensure the removal of omental metastatic lymph nodes and tumor deposits.

The omentum has some essential functions within the peritoneal cavity. The omentum functions as regulator of regional immune responses to prevent infections and, additionally, it prevents adhesions that can lead to small bowel obstruction. Omentectomy is associated with increased incidence of early and late postoperative complications such as abdominal abscess, ileus, and wound infections in various types of surgery.

There is little evidence regarding survival benefit of routine complete omentectomy during gastrectomy. The investigators hypothesize that omitting a complete omentectomy (and instead preserve the greater omentum distal of the gastroepiploic arcade) during gastrectomy for cancer does not negatively impact survival.

OMEGA is a randomized controlled, open, parallel, non-inferiority, multicenter trial. Adult patients (\>18 years) with primary resectable gastric cancer, clinical stage T2-4a N0-3 M0 or cT1N+ scheduled for open or minimally invasive (sub)total gastrectomy are included. The primary study objective is to investigate whether omentum preservation in gastrectomy for cancer is non-inferior to complete omentectomy in terms of three-year overall survival.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Omentectomy in Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer Trial

NCT02050659

Omentum Stomach Neoplasms

COMPLETED

Surgical Technique, Open Versus Minimally-invasive Gastrectomy After CHemotherapy

NCT02130726

Gastric Cancer

COMPLETED NA

Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

NCT02248519

Gastric Cancer

UNKNOWN NA

Effect of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

NCT02464215

Gastric Cancer

UNKNOWN NA

Enterotomy Closure and Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy

NCT04901585

Gastric Cancer

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary objective:

The primary study objective is evaluate whether preservation of the omentum distal to the gastroepiploic vessels in gastrectomy for cancer is non-inferior to complete omentectomy in terms of three-year overall survival.

Secondary objectives:

Comparing the two study arms with regard to:

* Operating time
* Intraoperative blood loss
* Intraoperative complications
* Postoperative complications, defined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification25 and comprehensive complication index (CCI)
* Distribution of lymph node metastases
* R0-resection rate
* Rate of malignant cells in cytology
* Molecular sub classification of gastric cancer
* ICG fluorescent enhancement of omentum in omentum preservation group (in centers that have ICG fluorescence available)
* Protocol compliance to allocated treatment
* Hospital stay, defined as time interval between date of surgery and date of hospital discharge
* Readmission rate within 30-days after surgery
* Reintervention rate within 30-days after surgery
* Reoperation rate within three years after surgery
* Quality of life at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months, the following questionnaires will be used: EQ-5D-5L, QLQ-C30, QLQ-OG25, CIPN, Happiness, HADS and work productivity
* 3- \& 5-year disease-free survival, defined as the period of time from operation to locoregional recurrence, peritoneal recurrence, distant metastases, second gastric cancer or death from any cause. Patients alive and free of all these events will be censored at the last follow-up.
* 5-year overall survival, defined as the period of time from operation to death from any cause. Patients alive and free of all these events will be censored at the last follow-up.
* Cost-effectiveness

Study design:

OMEGA is a randomized controlled, open, parallel, non-inferiority, multicenter trial. Eligible patients have to be operable (ASA \<4) with resectable (≦cT4aN3bM0) gastric cancer. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between radical (sub)total gastrectomy with omentum preservation or complete omentectomy. Patients will be stratified according to center, neoadjuvant therapy and type of surgery (total or subtotal gastrectomy). The primary endpoint is overall survival at three-years after the operation. In total, 654 patients will be randomized.

Sample size:

The primary endpoint is three-year overall survival. According to survival numbers from the Dutch Cancer Registry (NKR), three-year overall survival after gastrectomy is approximately 50% in the Netherlands. Under the common assumption of exponential survival times, a hazard ratio of 0.862 under the alternative hypothesis, at least 50% and 45% expected events (i.e., death) in the control arm and experimental arm, respectively, at the minimum follow-up of three years, 298 events are needed in total to achieve 80% power at a one-sided significance level of 5% with a non-inferiority hazard ratio of 1.15 (PASS 15 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2017). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA, ncss.com/software/pass), resulting in 314 patients per study arm. Dropouts will be rare (mostly due to loss to follow-up, which is quite rare in cancer patients), with proportion dropping out expected to be at most 5%. After correction for drop-out we plan to include 327 patients in each of the two arms (654 in total).

Statistical analysis:

Primary endpoint: Descriptive statistics will be calculated to summarize patients' groups included in each of trial arms.

Mean and standard deviation will be presented for normally distributed continuous variables. Median plus interquartile-range (IQR) will be presented continuous variables that are skewed and for ordinal variables. Dichotomous and nominal data will be summarized by means of frequencies and percentages.

Non-inferiority of the experimental treatment in terms of overall survival will be tested using Cox-regression. Non-inferiority will be concluded if the upper limit of the 90% confidence interval falls below the non-inferiority hazard ratio of 1.15, corresponding to a one-sided non-inferiority test at significance level of 5%. Survival will be presented graphically using Kaplan-Meier curves. All analyses will be according to the intention to treat principle. A per protocol analysis will also be performed. The experimental treatment will be declared non-inferior if non-inferiority is shown in both the intention to treat and the per protocol analysis.

Secondary endpoint: as independent samples t-test for normally-distributed continuous outcomes, Mann-Whitney tests for continuous outcomes that are not normally distributed or ordinal outcomes. Categorical outcomes will be compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test in case of low (expected) cell counts. Repeatedly measured outcomes will be compared between arms using linear mixed models. Secondary time-to-event outcomes will be compared the using log-rank test. Secondary endpoints will be tested at a two-sided significance level of 5%. Effect sizes suitable for the type of outcome measure will be provided (mean differences, ratio of geometric means, relative risks, hazard ratios) together with their 95% confidence interval.

Subgroup analysis for the effect of experimental treatment on overall survival will be performed for the follow subgroups: patient characteristics (age, male/female), diffuse/intestinal type gastric tumor, subtotal/total gastrectomy, and minimally invasive/open gastrectomy. Effect modification will use Cox regression with the subgroup variable, the arm and their two-way interaction. Additionally, stratified analyses will be performed where HR is calculated separately in each of the subgroups.

Quality of life data will be graphically represented across all time points and analyzed according to the manuals and will presented as domain and summarized scores. Questionnaire outcome comparisons will be analyzed using linear mixed models.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stomach Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Complete omentectomy

Gastrectomy with complete omentectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open or minimally invasive (sub)total gastrectomy

Omentum presevation

Gastrectomy with preservation of the omentum distal to the gastroepiploic vessels

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open or minimally invasive (sub)total gastrectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gastrectomy

Open or minimally invasive (sub)total gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary resectable gastric adenocarcinoma, clinical stage T1-4aN0-3M0
* ASA 1-3 (able to undergo surgery)
* Scheduled for open or minimally invasive (sub)total gastrectomy with modified D2-lymphadenectomy, with or without perioperative chemotherapy
* Age above 18
* Able to complete questionnaires in Dutch, English or Italian
* Written informed consent
* Esophageal invasion \< 2 cm defined from the upper margin of the gastric rugae as determined by endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Gastric cancer clinically staged as T1N0
* Locally advanced gastric cancer requiring multi-visceral resection
* Pregnancy
* Previous malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) \<2cm, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) \<2cm), unless no evidence of disease and diagnosed more than three years before diagnosis of gastric cancer, or with a life expectancy of more than five years from date of inclusion
* Serious concomitant systemic disorders that would compromise the safety of the patient or his/her ability to complete the study, at the discretion of the investigator
* Previous gastric or omental surgery, with the exclusion of a gastric perforation Indication for thoracotomy/thoracoscopy

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Suzanne S. Gisbertz

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Suzanne S. Gisberts, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Amsterdam UMC

Wietse J. Eshuis, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amsterdam UMC

Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amsterdam UMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.