Effectiveness of AOT Based on Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-24

Study Completion Date

2024-09-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rehabilitation of paretic stroke patients, aimed to improve function of the impaired upper limb, uses a wide range of intervention programs. A new rehabilitative approach, called Action Observation Therapy (AOT), based on the discovery of mirror neurons, has been used to improve motor functions of adult stroke patients and children with cerebral palsy. Recently, Virtual Reality (VR) provided the potential to increase the frequency and the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment and offered challenging and motivating tasks. The purpose of the present project is to design a randomized, controlled, six-month follow-up trial (RCT) for evaluating whether action observation (AO) added to standard VR (AO+VR) is effective in improving upper limb function in patients with stroke, compared with a control treatment consisting in observation of naturalistic scenes (CO) devoid of action content, followed by VR training (CO+VR). The AO+VR treatment may represent an extension of the current rehabilitative interventions available for recovery after stroke and the outcome of the project could allow to include this treatment within the standard sensorimotor training or in individualized tele-rehabilitation.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

VR-based Action Observation Treatment for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke: a Multimodal Study.

NCT05335772

Stroke

UNKNOWN NA

Efficacy of Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Muscle Stimulation in Post-stroke Patients.

NCT06055569

Stroke Stroke Sequelae

RECRUITING NA

Action Observation Treatment (AOT) as a Rehabilitation Tool

NCT02235350

Stroke, Acute Hemiplegia, Apraxia

UNKNOWN NA

Physiotherapy and Action-Observation Therapy: An Integrated Approach for Upper Limb Impairment in Subacute Stroke

NCT04560764

Stroke

WITHDRAWN NA

Action Observation Training for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients

NCT04622189

Stroke Rehabilitation

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is the leading cause of disability among adults, and more than 60% of stroke survivors have motor deficits, particularly related to the upper limb. Stroke rehabilitation usually involves intensive motor training aimed to promote adaptive plasticity, by reducing motor deficits and developing new motor learning strategies. It has recently been proposed that the systematic use of action observation (AO) followed by imitation (Action Observation Therapy - AOT) is an effective way to improve motor functions and to promote upper limb recovery in patients with motor disorders. During a typical AOT session, a series of daily life actions (e.g., grasping a key and inserting it into a lock) are practiced for about 2/5 weeks (with a frequency of 3-5 daily sessions per week). During each rehabilitation session, patients are instructed by the therapist to observe a specific action performed by an actor, presented as a short video-clip on a monitor, and afterwards to reproduce the previously observed action with the paretic limb. In each video, a single motor act is usually presented as observed from different perspectives (e.g., subjective, front or side view). This therapy is based on the neural model of the Mirror Neuron System (MNS), originally discovered in the monkey premotor and parietal cortex, formed by visuomotor neurons that become active both when a monkey performs a goal-directed motor act and when it simply observes the same o a similar motor act performed by the experimenter. A comparable MNS has also been identified in humans using different electrophysiological and neuroimaging techniques. In humans, the two main nodes of the MNS are the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and the ventral premotor cortex (PMv), plus the caudal part of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG).

AOT is considered particularly useful for activating the motor system in those conditions in which intensive motor training is not feasible, because of the severity of the impairment of motor functions or due to the presence of pain, inflammation, muscle fatigue. In the last years, new Virtual Reality-based (VR) rehabilitation treatments have been introduced, in order to present rehabilitation exercises in more practical and friendly setting. These treatments are generally well accepted by the patients because they offer several advantages: relatively low cost (in particular for semi-immersive versions), engaging environment, real-time personalization of exercises and greater adaptability to the patient's clinical features and progress, as well as possibility to record motor performance and to acquire and provide feedback to the patient in real time. Furthermore, VR exercises usually require a minimal therapist supervision, thereby facilitating home-based form of rehabilitation.

Several studies support the application of VR methods in the rehabilitation of the hemiplegic upper limb in patients with stroke. Recent literature reviews provided evidence for improvement of upper limb motor function and daily life activity after VR-based training, as compared to vicarious standard interventions. However, clinical evidence based on rigorous RCT on the effect of combined use of observation of actions followed by their immediate imitation in a VR environment (AO+VR therapy) are lacking, especially in the case of rehabilitation applied during the chronic phase after the stroke.

The main hypothesis is that, for the recovery of motor function of hemiplegic stroke patients, the combined rehabilitation treatment (AO+VR therapy) is more effective than a control treatment (Control Observation - CO) based on observation of videos without motor content (e.g., environmental natural scenes ), followed by the execution of actions in VR (CO+VR control therapy),.

In sum, the planned trial will examine the following hypotheses:

1. AO+VR is an effective tool to promote upper limb control in paretic stroke patients, and its effects are higher than CO+VR control treatment.
2. motor performance, cognitive level, and structural brain damage assessed before treatment are correlated to the degree of improvement determined by the AO+VR intervention;
3. AO+VR intervention determines, as compared to CO+VR control treatment, plastic functional changes of the MNS activity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Hemiplegia Hemiparesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study will consist in a multicentric, randomized, allocation concealed (waitlist-controlled) and evaluator-blinded clinical trial (RCT) with two investigative arms, using an intensive rehabilitation program based on the combined use of AO followed by imitation in VR (AO+VR) (experimental intervention) compared to a control treatment based on observation of control videos followed by action execution in VR (CO+VR) (control intervention).

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Participants and their caregivers will be informed about the study aims and procedures, but they will be blinded to group allocation. In the case the patient asks for the presence of the caregiver, she/he will be seated near the participant but out of her/his view, without interfering during the treatment session. The therapist performing the intervention will not be blinded to the group allocation. Outcome assessments will be administered and scored by a member of the staff blinded to group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AO+VR

Participants of the experimental group will undergo a treatment based on observation of actions followed by their immediate reproduction in VR (AO+VR treatment).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AO+VR

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The experimental treatment will consist of 15 hours (min. 15, max. 20), and will be carried out 4 days/week for a total duration of 5 weeks. During the rehabilitation sessions, the patient will be instructed to carefully watch videos lasting about 1.5 minutes, presented on Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) monitor, consisting in unimanual or bimanual actions performed by an actor, from a lateral perspective. Subsequently, the patient will be asked to imitate the actions presented for at least 3 consecutive times, within a time window of 3 min., using the same objects observed in the video, in a virtual scenario (VR), through the Khymeia Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS).

CO+VR

Participants randomly assigned to the control group will receive an equal number of rehabilitation sessions, as the experimental group. Differently from the latter, patients of the control group will be required to observe videos depicting naturalistic scenes, without motor contents, for 1.5 min. Then, they will receive a motor training in the VR environment, performing the same type of exercises included in the above-described experimental treatment, prompted by the verbal instructions of an expert therapist.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

CO+VR

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients of the control group will be required to observe videos depicting naturalistic scenes, without motor contents, for 1.5 min. Then, they will receive a motor training in the VR environment, performing the same type of exercises included in the above-described experimental treatment, prompted by the verbal instructions of an expert therapist. Thus, the general setting for carrying out the rehabilitation sessions will be identical to that of the experimental treatment, except for the fact that the control group will not be involved in action observation before preforming the exercises. Thus, the control treatment is not based on action imitation, but on purely motor execution.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AO+VR

The experimental treatment will consist of 15 hours (min. 15, max. 20), and will be carried out 4 days/week for a total duration of 5 weeks. During the rehabilitation sessions, the patient will be instructed to carefully watch videos lasting about 1.5 minutes, presented on Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) monitor, consisting in unimanual or bimanual actions performed by an actor, from a lateral perspective. Subsequently, the patient will be asked to imitate the actions presented for at least 3 consecutive times, within a time window of 3 min., using the same objects observed in the video, in a virtual scenario (VR), through the Khymeia Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

CO+VR

Patients of the control group will be required to observe videos depicting naturalistic scenes, without motor contents, for 1.5 min. Then, they will receive a motor training in the VR environment, performing the same type of exercises included in the above-described experimental treatment, prompted by the verbal instructions of an expert therapist. Thus, the general setting for carrying out the rehabilitation sessions will be identical to that of the experimental treatment, except for the fact that the control group will not be involved in action observation before preforming the exercises. Thus, the control treatment is not based on action imitation, but on purely motor execution.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. primarily motor symptoms with unilateral upper limb paresis (controlled via standard neurological examination);
2. residual movement ability of the paretic upper limb, controlled by Medical Research Council (MRC) index \> 2 and \< 4, active use of the hemiplegic limb, from minimal (mainly for assistance tasks to the preserved limb) to discrete (characterized by coarse manipulation and an inability to perform precision grip);
3. sufficient cooperation and cognitive understanding to participate in the activities, controlled by the investigator recruiting the patient.

Exclusion Criteria

1. severe cognitive impairment (score \<20 on MMSE);
2. presence of severe forms of unilateral spatial neglect (Bells Test, cut-off =/\> 50% ).
3. presence of severe anosognosia;
4. presence of severe language comprehension deficits assessed by clinical examination;
5. presence of severe untreated psychiatric disorders;
6. sensory impairment hindering participation and/or not compensated visual deficits of central origin;
7. drug-resistant epilepsy;
8. presence of cognitive disability (IQ \< 65) controlled by administration of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV (WAIS-IV) (Wechsler, 2008).

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No