Comparison of Ultrasound-guided and Palpation-inserted Peripheral Venous Cannula
NCT ID: NCT05156008
Last Updated: 2022-10-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-01
2024-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prospective randomized 2-arm study which is comparing success rate of ultrasound guided a palpation inserted cannulas in patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
The project will be managed according to the protocol of principles of Good Clinical Practice and valid regulations.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound-guided Axillary Artery vs Femoral Artery Cannulation.
NCT02801825
Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02975622
Effect of Ultrasound-guided Insertion on Peripheral Catheters Related Complications.
NCT05284422
Standard Ultrasound Guidance vs. New Needle-steering Device in Subclavian Venous Catheterization
NCT06050902
Femoral Arterial Access With Ultrasound Trial
NCT00667381
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Then there is a group of patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA). These patients often have to undergo repeated painful punctures through the skin when introducing PVC. Many times well trained healthcare worker in the ultrasound-guided vascular access is needed to introduce PVC in DIVA patients. Up to one third of adult patients are DIVA. In overweight orthopedic patients, this subpopulation can reach up to 50% . Up to 64% PVC fails within 72 hours.
Several studies have shown that PVC introduced at the site of limb flexion (elbow, wrist), repeated punctures increase the risk of thrombosis, infection and phlebitis. In expert groups, ultrasonographically guided vascular access (UGVA) appears to be a significantly better method, but studies on larger groups of patients are lacking.
Investigators hypothesise that UGVA is superior in many parameters. The aim of our study is to compare two types of cannula insertion methods and their benefits and risks for patients. Ultrasound guided insertion and palpation guided insertion. To have evidence robust enough and after statistical analysis investigators decided for sample of 500 patients.
Investigators will evaluate data after 100, 250 and 500 patients. After statistical analysis will be calculate benefit/risk ratio for patients and take steps towards patient safety and satisfaction.
The project will be managed according to the protocol of principles of Good Clinical Practice and valid regulations.
Patients are divided in two groups. Group A (insertion by palpation of vein): standard cannula (name brand "vasofix" BBraun) insertion through vein palpation and insertion in block room.
\- prior insertion medical staff will fill in study protocol form A
Group B (UGVA): DIVA score calculation, Ultrasound-guided (name brand "deep access introcan" BBraun) cannula insertion
\- prior insertion medical staff will fill in study protocol form B
In primary outcome investigators hypothesised that UGVA need less attempts to successful cannulation in comparison with vein cannulation by palpation. Investigators also think that deep vein cannula secured by UGVA will have lower failure rates by any means. In general there are several benefits in UGVA. On the other hand all above is applicable only in hands of well trained medical staff.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Patient on the operating room, before primary hip or knee arthroplasty, will have his or her cannula inserted by standard palpation of vein under strict aseptic measures. Application of tourniquet on upper arm, palpation of vein, disinfection of skin and insertion of cannula. After two unsuccessful punctures, UGVA operator will step in and perform insertion of cannula with ultrasound.
Medical staff will note:
* number of attempts
* time to obtain vascular access
* type of cannula
* DIVA score
No interventions assigned to this group
Group B
Patient on the operating room, before primary hip or knee arthroplasty, will have his or her cannula inserted by ultrasound guided vascular access under strict aseptic measures. With or without tourniquet applied on upper arm operator will prescan vasculature of arm to choose applicable vein. After disinfection of skin optimal vein is on plain part of arm and cannula must not end in flection (elbow, wrist) of arm.
Medical staff will note:
* number of attempts, if 2 attempts fail, another operator will perform insertion
* time to obtain vascular access
* diameter of vein
* type of cannula
* DIVA score
Ultrasound-guided vascular access
Patients in this arm will have peripheral venous cannula inserted under realtime ultrasound guidance. Out of plane technique (in plane technique if too deep when tip of the needle is on vessel wall) used by experienced physicians in UGVA. Out of plane technique strictly used in step by step manner. That means moving probe with the tip of the needle to always locate its exact position, all the way into the vein. All performed insertions are carried out by skilled operators in UGVA with out of plane technique. Just before surgery in block room.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound-guided vascular access
Patients in this arm will have peripheral venous cannula inserted under realtime ultrasound guidance. Out of plane technique (in plane technique if too deep when tip of the needle is on vessel wall) used by experienced physicians in UGVA. Out of plane technique strictly used in step by step manner. That means moving probe with the tip of the needle to always locate its exact position, all the way into the vein. All performed insertions are carried out by skilled operators in UGVA with out of plane technique. Just before surgery in block room.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* BMI over 25
Exclusion Criteria
* mental disorder
* age under 18
* sepsis
* protocol non-compliance
* gravidity
* patient refusal or no informed consent or both
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jakub Hlasny, MD, EDRA
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jakub Hlasny, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
physician of anesthesia and intensive care department
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Witting MD. IV access difficulty: incidence and delays in an urban emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
Alexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Carr PJ, Frost S, Inwood S, Higgins N, Lin F, Alberto L, Mermel L, Rickard CM. International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters. J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):530-3. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2389. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Ahlqvist M, Berglund B, Nordstrom G, Klang B, Wiren M, Johansson E. A new reliable tool (PVC assess) for assessment of peripheral venous catheters. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1108-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01278.x.
Webster J, Clarke S, Paterson D, Hutton A, van Dyk S, Gale C, Hopkins T. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008 Jul 8;337(7662):a339. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a339.
Hlasny J, Alberty R, Hlavac M, Grgac I, Grey MT, Venglarcik M. Comparison of ultrasound-guided and palpation-inserted peripheral venous cannula in -patients before primary hip or knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Jul 21;24(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07459-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
26/2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.