Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
19505 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-04-19
2023-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The most important step in the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC is the first surgical procedure called the transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). There is evidence that the quality of the TURBT operation, and the use of a single administration of bladder chemotherapy following the operation, can reduce cancer recurrence rates and progression to more invasive cancer. There is anecdotal evidence that the quality of TURBT surgery and the usage of intravesical chemotherapy varies widely between hospitals and thus may result in worse outcomes for some patients.
The primary objective of the study is to determine if audit and feedback can improve the quality of TURBT surgery and if this reduces recurrence of NMIBC.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) Combined With Adjuvant Intravenous GC Chemotherapy for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
NCT02716961
The Effect of Post-voiding Reisdual Urine on Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrence and Progression
NCT04617743
Diagnostic Performance and Predictive Capacity of Immediate Urine Cytology After Transurethral Resection of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer; A Prospective Study
NCT04194112
Trial to Compare Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Open Radical Cystectomy
NCT03049410
Impact of Time to Re-staging Transurethral Resection on Recurrence and Progression Rates
NCT04768894
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is known that achieving a "good quality" TURBT results in reduced NMIBC recurrence rates. This evidence forms the basis for the recommendations made in evidence-based guidelines such as the European Association of Urology (EAU), the American Urological Association (AUA) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The RESECT study will evaluate the effects of a variety of patient, hospital, surgical and surgeon-related factors which may contribute to altered outcome in patients with NMIBC following a TURBT.
The only known national data collection about quality standards in TURBT surgery is in Scotland. The aim is to conduct a multicentre international observational study of urological practice for the management of NMIBC. Current operative practice will be measured across hospitals, regions and countries and compare these against evidence-based recommendations. It will be determined if any hospital, service, training or technical factors impact the achievement of quality indicators and/or early recurrence rates. These data will be used to present hospital and surgeon performance back to surgeons as an intervention to drive quality improvement. The timing of feedback to different hospitals will be varied randomly so that it can determined if the feedback is having an impact on audit performance.
RESECT aims to answer some key UNKNOWNS:
Does reporting and comparing our TURBT quality make us do it better? What things should be measured to determine TURBT quality? What rate of achievement should be aimed for in our practice? What factors are associated with better achievement of TURBT quality?
Methods:
The is an observational study that will include randomized feedback and education to hospitals about their TURBT performance.
Sites will first submit survey data about usual practice, and then retrospective data about consecutive TURBT surgery previously performed at their site.
Sites will then be randomized to either receiving early feedback or to not receiving early feedback and just taking part in the study. Sites will then collect prospective data about consecutive TURBT surgeries performed at their site.
Performance will then be compared between hospitals that received feedback during the study and those who did not. All sites will receive the feedback intervention at the end of the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Audit only
This group of sites will participate in the audit. No performance feedback will be provided during the period under study. Feedback will be provided at the end of the study period.
No interventions assigned to this group
Audit with feedback
This group of sites will participate in the audit, and receive a feedback intervention about their practice based on retrospective data about surgery performed before the start of the study period.
Performance feedback and education
Hospitals and surgeons will have an online interactive performance feedback dashboard provided to them along with educational components.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Performance feedback and education
Hospitals and surgeons will have an online interactive performance feedback dashboard provided to them along with educational components.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
● Patients undergoing transurethral surgical treatment of confirmed transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgery not performed with curative intent: a. Diagnostic purposes only b. Symptomatic or palliative purposes only c. diffuse lesions that cannot cured by TURBT surgery
* Emergency TURBT
* Records lacking pre-defined minimum data set
* All records from sites where the study minimum requirements are not met
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Action Bladder Cancer UK
OTHER
British Journal of Urology International
UNKNOWN
Rosetrees Trust
OTHER
Photocure
INDUSTRY
KARL STORZ Endoscopy-America, Inc.
INDUSTRY
University College, London
OTHER
University of Aberdeen
OTHER
The Urology Foundation, United Kingdom
UNKNOWN
British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Veeru Kasivisvanathan, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University College, London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BURST
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gallagher K, Bhatt N, Clement K, Zimmermann E, Khadhouri S, MacLennan S, Kulkarni M, Gaba F, Anbarasan T, Asif A, Light A, Ng A, Chan V, Nathan A, Cooper D, Aucott L, Marcq G, Teoh JY, Hensley P, Duncan E, Goulao B, O'Brien T, Nielsen M, Mariappan P, Kasivisvanathan V. Audit, Feedback, and Education to Improve Quality and Outcomes in Transurethral Resection and Single-Instillation Intravesical Chemotherapy for Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treatment: Protocol for a Multicenter International Observational Study With an Embedded Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 15;12:e42254. doi: 10.2196/42254.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RESECT Protocol 4.0 111120
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.