Radiation Therapy or Surgery in Treating Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00867347
Last Updated: 2019-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-07-31
2017-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with surgery in treating patients with bladder cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Bladder Cancer That Was Removed by Surgery
NCT00777491
Radiation Therapy and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Bladder Cancer
NCT00003930
Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy Following Surgery in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Bladder Cancer
NCT00003642
Combination Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy With/Without Surgery In Patients With Stage II/III Bladder Cancer
NCT00055601
Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Bladder Cancer
NCT00024349
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* To determine the feasibility and patient acceptability of radical cystectomy vs selective bladder preservation (SBP) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
* To determine compliance rates of patients with their assigned treatments.
* To determine if bladder preservation is equivalent to radical cystectomy, in terms of overall survival, in responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Secondary
* To compare the overall survival of patients receiving SBP vs radical cystectomy.
* To determine the rate of salvage cystectomy in patients undergoing bladder preservation.
* To determine and compare the toxicity of treatment in both arms.
* To determine and compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
* To compare locoregional progression-free and metastasis-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to cancer center and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Patients are assessed after completion of 3 courses of pre-study neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with poor response (≥ pT2, residual pT2, macroscopic invasive tumor) undergo immediate radical cystectomy (within 6 weeks fo completing chemotherapy). Patients\* with responsive disease (≤ pT1 tumor or macroscopically normal bladder) proceed to course 4 of chemotherapy (on-study) followed by treatment according to randomization arm.
NOTE: \*Patients with a clear bladder or those who are unsure of their histological results prior to course 4 also proceed to chemotherapy.
* Course 4 of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV over 4 hours on day 1.
* Arm I (radical cystectomy): Patients undergo a radical cystectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy, between 4 and 6 weeks after initiating course 4 of chemotherapy.
* Arm II (selective bladder preservation): Patients with no visible residual tumor (cT0 or pT0) or residual but superficial tumor (pTa, pT1) undergo radiotherapy beginning within 4-6 weeks of day 1 of course 4 and continuing for 6.5 weeks.
Health-related quality of life is assessed periodically.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I
Patients undergo a radical cystectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy,
between 4 and 6 weeks after initiating course 4 of chemotherapy.
therapeutic conventional surgery
Patients undergo radical cystectomy
Arm II
Patients with no visible residual tumor (cT0 or pT0) or residual but superficial tumor (pTa, pT1) undergo radiotherapy beginning within 4-6 weeks of day 1 of course 4 and continuing for 6.5 weeks.
radiation therapy
Patients undergo radiotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
therapeutic conventional surgery
Patients undergo radical cystectomy
radiation therapy
Patients undergo radiotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No bilateral total hip replacements
* No significant comorbid medical conditions that would interfere with administration of any protocol treatment
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
* See Disease Characteristics
* No prior pelvic radiotherapy
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert A. Huddart, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute of Cancer Research - Sutton
Sutton, England, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Paramasivan S, Huddart R, Hall E, Lewis R, Birtle A, Donovan JL. Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011). Trials. 2011 Mar 15;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-78.
Huddart RA, Birtle A, Maynard L, Beresford M, Blazeby J, Donovan J, Kelly JD, Kirkbank T, McLaren DB, Mead G, Moynihan C, Persad R, Scrase C, Lewis R, Hall E. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of SPARE - a randomised feasibility study of selective bladder preservation versus radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):639-650. doi: 10.1111/bju.13900. Epub 2017 May 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ICR-SPARE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ISRCTN61126465
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EU-20907
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ICR-CTSU/2006/10002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000633526
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.