Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of Genoss® DCB and IN.PACT Admiral® DCB in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

NCT ID: NCT05134545

Last Updated: 2024-08-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

119 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-24

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of GENOSS DCB versus IN.PACT Admiral DCB on late lumen loss 6 months after the procedure in patients with de novo or non-stented restenotic lesions of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery and to evaluate the safety.

This clinical trial will be conducted on a total of 118 patients at 11 domestic institutions (taking into account the dropout rate of 30%).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this clinical trial, IN.PACT Admiral, which is the most similar to GENOSS DCB, a test device, and the product type and purpose of use, and whose effectiveness has already been proven through numerous clinical studies, was selected as a control product.

Due to the nature of this clinical trial, the investigator cannot be blinded to the treatment method to which the subject is assigned, so it is designed as a double-blind design in which only the subject and the independent evaluator are blinded.

For efficacy and safety evaluation, follow-up is performed up to 12 months after procedure of the clinical trial medical device.

The primary endpoint of the effectiveness evaluation was performed by an independent evaluator and CT angiography at 6 months of in-segment late lumen loss.

It is evaluated the revascularization rate, Rutherford classification, the amount of change in ABI or TBI at 1, 6, and 12 months, the procedural success rate during the clinical trial period, and the device success rate immediately after the procedure.

Safety evaluation is confirmed through all adverse events, MAE (Major adverse event), vital signs, physical examination and laboratory test results that occur to the subject during the clinical trial period after procedure of the clinical trial medical device.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Artery Disease De Novo Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Genoss® DCB

Paclitaxel Coated PTA Balloon Catheter

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Genoss® DCB

Intervention Type DEVICE

Peripheral Drug Coated Balloon

IN.PACT Admiral® DCB

Paclitaxel Coated PTA Balloon Catheter

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

IN.PACT Admiral® DCB

Intervention Type DEVICE

Peripheral Drug Coated Balloon

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Genoss® DCB

Peripheral Drug Coated Balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

IN.PACT Admiral® DCB

Peripheral Drug Coated Balloon

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ≥ 19 years and ≤ 85 years of age
2. Documented ischemia with Rutherford classification 2, 3, 4 or 5
3. Target lesion is in the SFA and/or PPA
4. Reference vessel diameter ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 7 mm by visual estimate
5. Angiographic evidence that target lesion consists of a single de novo or non-stented restenotic lesion;

* 70% - 99% occluded with total lesion length ≥ 40 mm and ≤ 300 mm
* 100% occluded with total lesion length ≤ 100 mm
* Combination lesions (a non-occlusive lesion that includes a totally occluded segment along its length) are eligible provided that (1) the combined lesion length is ≥ 40 mm and ≤ 300 mm and (2) the totally occluded segment is not greater than 100 mm in length.
* Tandem or adjacent lesions are treated as a single lesion, the gap between the lesions is ≤ 30 mm, and the total combined lesion length including the distance between the lesions is ≥ 40 mm and ≤ 300 mm

Exclusion Criteria

1. Stroke or STEMI within 3 months prior to enrollment
2. Acute thrombosis or acute aneurysm in the target lesion
3. History of or planning to have a major amputation in the leg
4. Failure to successfully cross the target lesion with a guidewire
5. Poor distal run-off artery to the ankle or lower
6. Known allergies or sensitivities to paclitaxel, shellac, vitamin E, heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapies or contrast agent
7. Target lesion is one of the following;

* In-stent restenosis (ISR)
* Restenosis after DCB procedure
* Previously treated with bypass surgery
* Severe concentric calcified lesions on angiography where pre-dilation cannot be performed or failed, and the procedure for the device for clinical trials is inadequate
8. Those who need stenting due to vascular dissection that restricts blood flow of Grade D or higher after pre-dilation
9. Any major (e.g., cardiac, peripheral, abdominal) intervention (including in the contralateral SFA/PPA) planned within 30 days post index procedure
10. Life expectancy, in the Investigator's opinion, is less than 12 months
11. Chronic renal insufficiency with serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Genoss Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Je Hwan Won, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ajou University Hospital

Suwon, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSP-DS1411

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

IN.PACT Global Clinical Study
NCT01609296 COMPLETED NA
Zilver® PTX™ Global Registry
NCT01094678 COMPLETED NA