Prognostic Effect of Whether Doing PLND During RC for High-risk NMIBC

NCT ID: NCT05123625

Last Updated: 2025-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-01

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There is no consensus on the need for lymph node dissection in radical cystectomy (RC) for high-risk non-muscular invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Investigators divided participants at high risk of NMIBC without enlarged lymph nodes as indicated by pelvic MRI into two groups 1:1. One group of participants underwent RC combined with lymph node dissection and the other group of participants only underwent RC. The incidence of complications and PFS/OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bladder cancer is highly prevalent worldwide and approximately 75% of these are non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). For high-risk NMIBC, postoperative intravesical chemotherapy combined with full-dose BCG for 3 years is recommended. Radical cystectomy (RC) is also one of the treatment options, and is recommended for patients with BCG-naïve, BCG-refractory, and recurrent high-grade or carcinoma-in-situ (CIS) bladder cancer after BCG perfusion.

RC combined with pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for MIBC. Currently, there is no conclusion on the radical treatment of NMIBC, most of NMIBC patients refer to MIBC and also perform pelvic lymph node dissection. However, long operation time, high incidence of lymphatic cyst, lymphatic leakage and other complications, and long recovery time, increase the psychological and economic burden. At present, many studies have showed that the positive rate of lymph nodes in NMIBC patients is low. Investigators also analyzed the data of patients who underwent RC in investigators' center from 2013 to 2019, and found that the positive rate of lymph nodes in 163 NMIBC patients was only 3.07%.

MRI can effectively predict pelvic metastatic lymph nodes, and its sensitivity and negative predictive values have been reported as high as 76.4% and 71.4%. VI-RADS score can effectively judge the muscularity of bladder tumor. Therefore, Investigators proposed whether it is necessary to perform pelvic lymph node dissection in NMIBC patients without enlarged lymph nodes indicated by pelvic MRI. Investigators intended to divide participants at high risk of NMIBC without enlarged lymph nodes as indicated by pelvic MRI into two groups 1:1. One group underwent RC combined with lymph node dissection and the other group only underwent RC. The incidence of complications and PFS/OS at 1, 3, and 5 years were compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bladder Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RC combined with lymph node dissection

When radical cystectomy was performed, pelvic lymph node dissection was also performed.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Only RC

In the intervention group, investigators used a reductive approach. That is, for radical cystectomy, investigators did not perform pelvic lymph node dissection.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reduce surgical procedures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the intervention group, investigators used a reductive approach. That is, for radical cystectomy, investigators did not perform pelvic lymph node dissection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reduce surgical procedures

In the intervention group, investigators used a reductive approach. That is, for radical cystectomy, investigators did not perform pelvic lymph node dissection.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients who did not undergo diagnostic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT): biopsy suggestive of G3/high grade or with CIS or cystoscopic findings of multiple, tumor diameter greater than 3 cm; and VI-RADS score of 1 or 2; and no enlarged lymph nodes detected by MRI.
2. Patients undergoing diagnostic TURBT: pathologically confirmed high-risk NMIBC, a) stage T1; b) G3 or high-grade; c) CIS; d) multiple, recurrent TaG1G2/low-grade bladder cancer patients with \>3 cm in diameter. And no enlarged lymph nodes detected on MRI.
3. Benefit from radical cystectomy as assessed by the investigator.
4. Meeting the indications for the procedure: a) absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 \*109/L; b) platelets ≥ 100 \*109/L; c) hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L; d) international normalized ratio or activated partial thromboplastin time ≤ 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN); e) calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 1 ml/s f) serum total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 \* ULN; g) AST, ALT and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 \* ULN; h) cardiopulmonary function suggestive of tolerance to major abdominal surgery.
5. No previous history of tumor, lymph node dissection, or immune system-related disease.
6. Age 18 to 75 years.
7. No neoadjuvant therapy.
8. ECOG physical status 0 or 1.
9. Voluntary participation in this trial, ability to provide written informed consent, and understanding and agreement to comply with the requirements of this study and the evaluation schedule.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with bladder cancer ≥ T2N0M0 confirmed by pathology or assessed by imaging, or with pelvic lymph node enlargement indicated by MRI;
2. The investigator assessed patients who could not tolerate radical cystectomy;
3. Previous systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy;
4. The presence of active autoimmune diseases requiring systemic treatment or other diseases requiring long-term use of large amounts of hormones and other immunosuppressants;
5. Had undergone major surgery or major trauma within 28 days before enrollment;
6. Received live vaccine within 28 days before enrollment;
7. Severe chronic or active infections requiring systemic antibacterial, antifungal or antiviral therapy within 14 days prior to enrollment;
8. Received any Chinese herbal medicine or proprietary Chinese medicine for cancer control within 14 days before enrollment;
9. Participating in other clinical studies.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RenJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Qiang Lu, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Xiao Yang, MD

Role: CONTACT

+86 13951813528

Juntao Zhuang

Role: CONTACT

+86 15651753950

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Qiang Lu, PhD

Role: primary

13505196501

Xiao Yang

Role: backup

13951813528

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, Kassouf W, Kiemeney LA, La Vecchia C, Shariat S, Lotan Y. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22877502 (View on PubMed)

Babjuk M, Burger M, Comperat EM, Gontero P, Mostafid AH, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Sylvester R, Zigeuner R, Capoun O, Cohen D, Escrig JLD, Hernandez V, Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Soukup V. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update. Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):639-657. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31443960 (View on PubMed)

Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, Clark PE, Daneshmand S, Konety BR, Pruthi R, Quale DZ, Ritch CR, Seigne JD, Skinner EC, Smith ND, McKiernan JM. Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.049. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27317986 (View on PubMed)

Raj GV, Herr H, Serio AM, Donat SM, Bochner BH, Vickers AJ, Dalbagni G. Treatment paradigm shift may improve survival of patients with high risk superficial bladder cancer. J Urol. 2007 Apr;177(4):1283-6; discussion 1286. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.090.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17382713 (View on PubMed)

Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, Hernandez V, Linares Espinos E, Lorch A, Neuzillet Y, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Veskimae E, Ribal MJ, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32360052 (View on PubMed)

Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R, Dreicer R, Kamat AM, Lerner SP, Lotan Y, Meeks JJ, Michalski JM, Morgan TM, Quale DZ, Rosenberg JE, Zietman AL, Holzbeierlein JM. Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):552-559. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.086. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28456635 (View on PubMed)

Bruins HM, Huang GJ, Cai J, Skinner DG, Stein JP, Penson DF. Clinical outcomes and recurrence predictors of lymph node positive urothelial cancer after cystectomy. J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.017. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19758623 (View on PubMed)

Karl A, Carroll PR, Gschwend JE, Knuchel R, Montorsi F, Stief CG, Studer UE. The impact of lymphadenectomy and lymph node metastasis on the outcomes of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2009 Apr;55(4):826-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19150582 (View on PubMed)

Brossner C, Pycha A, Toth A, Mian C, Kuber W. Does extended lymphadenectomy increase the morbidity of radical cystectomy? BJU Int. 2004 Jan;93(1):64-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04557.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14678370 (View on PubMed)

Perera M, McGrath S, Sengupta S, Crozier J, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Nov;15(11):686-692. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0066-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30104615 (View on PubMed)

Gschwend JE, Heck MM, Lehmann J, Rubben H, Albers P, Wolff JM, Frohneberg D, de Geeter P, Heidenreich A, Kalble T, Stockle M, Schnoller T, Stenzl A, Muller M, Truss M, Roth S, Liehr UB, Leissner J, Bregenzer T, Retz M. Extended Versus Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Survival Results from a Prospective, Randomized Trial. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):604-611. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.047. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30337060 (View on PubMed)

Froehner M, Novotny V, Heberling U, Rutsch L, Litz RJ, Hubler M, Koch R, Baretton GB, Wirth MP. Relationship of the number of removed lymph nodes to bladder cancer and competing mortality after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):987-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.046. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25150172 (View on PubMed)

Jeong IG, You D, Kim JW, Song C, Hong JH, Ahn H, Kim CS. Outcomes of single lymph node positive urothelial carcinoma after radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2085-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.056. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21496833 (View on PubMed)

Lenis AT, Lec PM, Michel J, Brisbane W, Golla V, Sharma V, Gollapudi K, Blumberg J, Chamie K. Predictors of adequate lymph node dissection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and effect on survival. Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(10):796.e7-796.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32446641 (View on PubMed)

Abdollah F, Sun M, Schmitges J, Djahangirian O, Tian Z, Jeldres C, Perrotte P, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Stage-specific impact of pelvic lymph node dissection on survival in patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(8):1147-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10482.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21883849 (View on PubMed)

Bruins HM, Skinner EC, Dorin RP, Ahmadi H, Djaladat H, Miranda G, Cai J, Daneshmand S. Incidence and location of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for clinical non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: results from a prospective lymph node mapping study. Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):24.e13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.08.015. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23395238 (View on PubMed)

Papalia R, Simone G, Grasso R, Augelli R, Faiella E, Guaglianone S, Cazzato R, Del Vescovo R, Ferriero M, Zobel B, Gallucci M. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients selected for radical cystectomy: detection rate of pelvic lymph node metastases. BJU Int. 2012 Apr;109(7):1031-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10446.x. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21883835 (View on PubMed)

Li Y, Diao F, Shi S, Li K, Zhu W, Wu S, Lin T. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis in bladder cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2018 Jan 26;37(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0269-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29370848 (View on PubMed)

Del Giudice F, Barchetti G, De Berardinis E, Pecoraro M, Salvo V, Simone G, Sciarra A, Leonardo C, Gallucci M, Catalano C, Catto JWF, Panebianco V. Prospective Assessment of Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) and Its Clinical Impact on the Management of High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Patients Candidate for Repeated Transurethral Resection. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.029. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31699526 (View on PubMed)

Fragkoulis C, Glykas I, Papadopoulos G, Ntoumas K. Multiparametric MRI in differentiation between muscle invasive and non-muscle invasive urinary bladder cancer with vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) application. Br J Radiol. 2020 May 1;93(1109):20200025. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200025. Epub 2020 Mar 11. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32160006 (View on PubMed)

Ueno Y, Takeuchi M, Tamada T, Sofue K, Takahashi S, Kamishima Y, Hinata N, Harada K, Fujisawa M, Murakami T. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multireader Validation Study. Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):54-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30922688 (View on PubMed)

Giacalone NJ, Shipley WU, Clayman RH, Niemierko A, Drumm M, Heney NM, Michaelson MD, Lee RJ, Saylor PJ, Wszolek MF, Feldman AS, Dahl DM, Zietman AL, Efstathiou JA. Long-term Outcomes After Bladder-preserving Tri-modality Therapy for Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: An Updated Analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital Experience. Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):952-960. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.020. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28081860 (View on PubMed)

Garcia-Perdomo HA, Montes-Cardona CE, Guacheta M, Castillo DF, Reis LO. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer organ-preserving therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2018 Dec;36(12):1997-2008. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2384-6. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29943218 (View on PubMed)

Kulkarni GS, Hermanns T, Wei Y, Bhindi B, Satkunasivam R, Athanasopoulos P, Bostrom PJ, Kuk C, Li K, Templeton AJ, Sridhar SS, van der Kwast TH, Chung P, Bristow RG, Milosevic M, Warde P, Fleshner NE, Jewett MAS, Bashir S, Zlotta AR. Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2299-2305. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2327. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28410011 (View on PubMed)

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15273542 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-SR-291.A1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.