Lymph Node Dissection in High-risk UTUC(Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma)
NCT ID: NCT03230201
Last Updated: 2017-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-01
2021-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prophylactic Intravesical Chemotherapy to Prevent Bladder Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients
NCT02923557
Primary Excision Combined With Preoperative Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy for Oligometastasis of Urothelial Carcinoma
NCT04570410
Prognosis of Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Kidney-sparing Therapy
NCT06204406
Prophylactic Intravesical Chemotherapy to Prevent Bladder Tumors After Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinomas
NCT02547350
A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on Monitoring Recurrence of Urothelial Carcinoma Based on Detection of Urinary Microscopic Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT06991868
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
\~2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The therapeutic role of regional lymph node dissection (LND) for patients with UTUC remains undetermined. Most reports have supported its staging benefit in which patients with no lymph node metastases (pN0) and those with pathological node metastasis (pN+) are stratified from those without LND (pNx). However, the therapeutic benefit of LND remains controversial. This discrepancy might be attributed to two factors. First, there remains a lack of standardization in the extent of LND. Kondo T et al and Matin SF et al previously reported the primary sites of lymphatic metastases from a mapping study, and then determined the anatomical extent of regional lymph nodes. Second, all results reported so far have been, to the best of our knowledge, derived from retrospective studies. Thus, the current guideline recommends LND for invasive UTUC on the basis of insufficient evidence. AIM OF THE WORK This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection in the prevention of recurrence and metastasis after radical nephroureterectomy for high-risk primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients Type of the study: A randomized controlled trial (RCT), phase II. Study locality: Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital. Institute of Urology, Peking University. National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China. Study design: Patients who was ready to receive nephroureterectomy for high-risk primary UTUC will be prospectively randomized into two groups using excel software by random table function. I. Group 1: will receive LND during radical nephroureterectomy. II. Group 2: do not receive LND during surgery.
Inclusion Criteria:
I. Suspected high-risk UTUC patients without metastases in their preoperative radiological imaging (cN0M0).II. Suspected high-risk UTUC patients without history of bladder tumor.
III. Suspected high-risk UTUC patients without synchronous bladder tumor. IV. Suspected high-risk UTUC patients without contralateral UTUCs.
Exclusion criteria:
I. Patients with significant metastases in their preoperative radiological imaging.
II. Patients with history of bladder tumor. III. Patients with synchronous bladder tumor. IV. Patients with contralateral UTUCs. V. Patients with advanced stage (T4). VI. Patients with other malignant tumors. Methods Intervention Patients who sign an informed consent for agreement to participate will be randomly allocated into one of the two groups using excel software by random table function at the day of nephroureterectomy. In group 1, patients will receive LND during radical nephroureterectomy. While for patients in group 2, no LND will be received. All data will be prospectively maintained and include patients' demographics, preoperative laboratory parameters, operative details and postoperative complications Follow up The scheduled follow up will be according to the EAU guidelines (RouprĂȘt et al., 2015) by scheduling a urine cytology and cystoscopy at 3 months then yearly while CT urography every year for non-invasive tumors and every 6 months over 2 years and then yearly for invasive tumors. All chemotherapy-related complications will be reported. Outcome and end-point The primary outcome of the study is to determine the overall survival (OS). The secondary outcome is to determine the adverse events postoperative morbidity, mortality and other survival (RFS, CSS, EFS) of patients with high-risk UTUC.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Blank control
do not receive Lymph node dissection during surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
Lymph node dissection
will receive Lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy.
Lymph node dissection
Lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lymph node dissection
Lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
III. Suspected high-risk UTUC patients without synchronous bladder tumor. IV. Suspected high-risk UTUC patients without contralateral UTUCs
Exclusion Criteria
II. Patients with history of bladder tumor. III. Patients with synchronous bladder tumor. IV. Patients with contralateral UTUCs. V. Patients with advanced stage (T4). VI. Patients with other malignant tumors
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University First Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Xuesong Li
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Liqun Zhou, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Peking University First Hosipital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Gengyan XIONG, M.D.
Role: primary
Runqi GUO, M.D.
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IUPU-16-UTUC-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.