Peri-implant Tissues on the Galimplant Anti-rotational Slim Abutment.

NCT ID: NCT05118815

Last Updated: 2025-03-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-21

Study Completion Date

2025-07-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A dental implant is an alloplastic material surgically inserted in a residual bone ridge, mainly with a prosthetic foundation. Nowadays the most widely used implants and with a higher degree of scientific evidence are the titanium root-form endosseous implants. In addition to the root component, the prosthodontic systems that allow the crown to be connected to the implant are very important. The aim of this project is to compare a classic anti-rotational straight esthetic multi-position attachment with the new anti-rotational straight esthetic slim multi-position abutment, both placed at the time of implant surgery. A multicenter randomized single-blind (for the patient) split-mouth randomized clinical trial will be performed to compare the composition, distribution and structure of the peri-implant tissues around the classic straight (control) and Slim (test) intermediate prosthetic abutments of the manufacturer Galimplant (Sarria; Lugo, Spain). The objective is to study which abutment design obtains a better biological seal from the clinical and histomorphometric point of view. For this purpose, 60 dental implants will be placed for the replacement of bilateral posterior absences in 30 patients attending the Master of Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology of the University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Throughout implantological history there have been many proposals and modifications in terms of anchorage system, shape, materials, etc. In this project we intend to compare a classic anti-rotational straight esthetic multi-position attachment with the new anti-rotational straight esthetic slim multi-position abutment.

This will hypothetically allow to increase the contact surface of the peri-implant connective tissue, increase the adhesion and sealing power, improve the biological width and consequently minimize the risk of peri-implant diseases such as mucositis and peri-implantitis.

In this regard, we must analyze the healing process of the peri-implant soft tissue after surgery, which will result in a stable peri-implant mucosa. After surgery, soft tissue healing around the transmucosal portion of an implant begins with the formation of a blood clot and the induction of an inflammatory process aimed at tissue formation and remodeling. If that soft tissue formation and remodeling is adequate, the healing process will result in an effective attachment mucosa around the transmucosal portion of the implant.

To obtain this adequate peri-implant mucosa, it is very important that a proper healing process takes place. This process includes the recruitment of inflammatory cells and a process of angiogenesis; and if both processes are correctly developed, all the phases of mucosal healing (hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling of the collagen matrix) will occur successfully.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Teeth Absent Tooth-loss Tooth Extraction Dental Implant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A total of 60 dental implants Hexagonal Internal Connection Implants (Model IPX), Galimplant® will be used in this study, for the replacement of bilateral maxillary posterior missing teeth in 30 patients (split-mouth study). For the designation of the type of transepithelial abutment to be placed in each hemimaxillary, we will use an online randomization service (www.randomization.com). After surgery, 30 patients will have a conventional straight esthetic abutment 3 mm in height (control group), and the other 30 will have a Slim (New Slim) transepithelial abutment of the same height (test group); in no case will we place the transepithelial closure abutment to achieve contact of the peri-implant mucosa with the surface of the transepithelial abutments. The implant will be placed whenever bone and gingival availability allows it juxta-osseous to avoid collateral damage in the exeresis of the peri-implant perimetral soft tissue (hereinafter donut)
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional straight esthetic abutment

After implant surgery, 30 patients will have a 3 mm high conventional straight esthetic abutment placed. The implant placement will follow the manufacturer's instructions and the operator's expertise to achieve stability with an insertion torque of at least 40 N, recording the final torque with a calibrated torque wrench. The implant will be placed whenever bone and gingival availability allows it, juxta-osseous to avoid collateral damage in the peri-implant perimetral soft tissue excision (donut). The abutment will be placed at 30 N as indicated by the manufacturer. After removal of the donut, a new abutment will be placed and left in place up to 3 months to allow healing and complete osseointegration. Patients will receive prosthodontic loading following standard metal-ceramic rehabilitation protocols and the manufacturer's recommendation. The prosthesis will be screw-retained, on the abutment placed after excision of the donut, screwed at 25 N.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard abutment

Intervention Type OTHER

Use a standard abutment

Slim (New Slim) transepithelial abutment

After surgery, 30 patients will have a 3 mm high transepithelial New Slim abutment placed. The implant placement will follow the manufacturer's instructions and the operator's expertise to achieve stability with an insertion torque of at least 40 N, recording the final torque with a calibrated torque wrench. The implant will be placed whenever bone and gingival availability allows it, juxta-osseous to avoid collateral damage in the peri-implant perimetral soft tissue excision (donut). The abutment will be placed at 30 N as indicated by the manufacturer. After removal of the donut, a new abutment will be placed and left in place up to 3 months to allow healing and complete osseointegration. Patients will receive prosthodontic loading following standard metal-ceramic rehabilitation protocols and the manufacturer's recommendation. The prosthesis will be screw-retained, on the abutment placed after excision of the donut, screwed at 25 N

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Slim abutment

Intervention Type OTHER

Use a narrower abutment to see if they present a better biological seal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Slim abutment

Use a narrower abutment to see if they present a better biological seal.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard abutment

Use a standard abutment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Systemic conditions favorable for the performance of oral surgical procedures (ASA I/II).
* Not to be completely edentulous
* Bilateral absence of at least two teeth (one per hemimaxillary) in the posterior area (from the first premolar to the second molar) with or without free distal ends.
* That do not require regenerative techniques
* That allow the placement of Galimplant implants of 4.5 or 5 mm in diameter in edentulous areas with mature bone of at least 3 months healing time
* With a prosthetic space of at least 8 mm.
* In case of odd absences, a slim abutment will be placed, being the group to be tested always in the majority.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of any disease, condition or medication that may compromise the healing and/or osseointegration of dental implants (uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, administration of bone modifying agents (BMA). Presence of any severe mental disorder, and patients who have received head and neck radiotherapy during the previous 18 months.
* Patients who do not have sufficient peri-implant keratinized gingiva to allow at least 1 mm of residual gingiva after excision of the tissue under study.
* Esthetic edentulous areas of 13-23, Implants with primary stability with ISQ \< 50 or \<40N, or with abutments that cannot receive torque at 30N are excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Salamanca

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Valencia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad de Murcia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Health Research Institute of Santiago

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Santiago de Compostela

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mario Pérez Sayáns

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mario Pérez-Sayáns, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Santiago de Compostela

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad de Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MC/TP/2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.