Electrical Stimulation for Spasticity in Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT05103436

Last Updated: 2026-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-04

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study examines the immediate and long-term effects of lumbosacral TENS on spasticity and residual voluntary force control in spinal cord injury in comparison to no TENS. Participants in the intervention group will receive 2 months of TENS. Participants in the control group will receive TENS after a 2-month delay. Modified Ashworth score and pendulum test will be used to assess spasticity and force control. Electrophysiological measures will be used to assess the activity profile of motorneurons.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been used to control pain in stroke, MS, cerebral palsy and spinal cord injury (SCI) and its effect on spasticity reduction, although not used clinically, has been examined recently. In the few SCI studies done to date, the TENS electrodes have been placed on the nerve to the muscle under study and initial reports show a consistent decrease in spasticity measures, like the Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) and reflexes, during or hours after the TENS application. Recently, study team members from the ReYu Recovery Centre in Edmonton have observed that when TENS is applied with both electrodes over the lower back (lumbosacral TENS), varying amounts of immediate and long-term spasticity relief are produced in both legs.

The investigators have observed 3 clients from ReYU and all have shown immediate reductions in spasticity for at least 2 joints in both legs. The effect of the lumbosacral TENS varied from an immediate dramatic reduction to a more moderate reduction when applied over several days. This study will examine the immediate and longer-term (2 months) effect of using spinal TENS in reducing spasticity of the lower limbs in a larger number of participants with SCI. The investigators want to understand how spinal TENS affects spinal circuits and motoneurons below the lesion to reduce spasticity to observe improvement in its effect in those with more moderate responses. Lumbosacral TENS has the potential for a non-pharmacological, on-demand control of SCI spasticity to greatly improve the quality of life of those affected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomized to either receive 2 months of TENS (1 hr AM, 1 hr PM/day, 50 Hz, below pain/motor threshold, using a EMS 7500 TENS unit) upon entry to the study (Intervention group) or not (Control; but offered the same TENS following a 2-month delay for equipoise).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Participants will not receive intervention for the first 2 months. This period will be used for comparison with the intervention group. At the end of the 2-month delay, they will receive TENS (1 hr AM, 1 hr PM/day, 50 Hz, below pain/motor threshold, using an EMS 7500 TENS unit).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention Group

Participants will receive 2 months of TENS (1 hr AM, 1 hr PM/day, 50 Hz, below pain/motor threshold, using an EMS 7500 TENS unit) immediately upon entry to the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TENS

Intervention Type OTHER

Electrical nerve stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TENS

Electrical nerve stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* SCI adults 18 years and older
* injury levels between C5-T12

Exclusion Criteria

* severe head injury
* uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
* other medical conditions precluding TENS
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alberta

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Monica Gorassini, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alberta

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alberta - 524 HMRC

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00112681

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nerve Root Block in Spasticity
NCT06868342 COMPLETED NA