Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
134 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2022-02-17
Study Completion Date
2023-02-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Current evidence shows that many people living with stroke experience major problems with eating and drinking. We know that this can lead to malnutrition, dehydration, reduced muscle strength and depression. It can also lead to longer stays in hospital, reduced ability to participate in rehabilitation and in the long term poorer quality of life. People living with stroke say the pleasure gained from eating and drinking changes after a stroke. They describe feeling embarrassed and ashamed and report a loss of self-confidence.
Therefore, being able to eat and drink independently is essential for health and well-being. People with stroke welcome opportunities to address eating and drinking problems early in their rehabilitation and would like more opportunities to practice the necessary skills needed, to regain independence. Early rehabilitation interventions have the potential to improve long-term outcomes by providing strategies, assistive devices and rehabilitation as early as possible in stroke recovery.
Health care professionals are using breakfast groups to provide opportunities to practice preparation and consumption of food and drink with enabling support. Consultations with patients and health care professionals have found that the processes involved in breakfast group interventions lack rigour and multi-disciplinary team coordination, thus leading to uncertainty about what outcomes are achieved for each patient.
This co-designed study aims to find out if it is possible to improve patient outcomes by providing more intensive interventions in a breakfast group format delivered by a range of health care professionals over five days of the week. The intervention will be co-designed with a stakeholder group comprising of patients, carers and stroke unit health care professionals supported by an advisory group, comprising of experts in the field. The intervention will be delivered in three sites and it will include a tool kit to support the integrated assessment, care plan and outcome measures.
Therefore, being able to eat and drink independently is essential for health and well-being. People with stroke welcome opportunities to address eating and drinking problems early in their rehabilitation and would like more opportunities to practice the necessary skills needed, to regain independence. Early rehabilitation interventions have the potential to improve long-term outcomes by providing strategies, assistive devices and rehabilitation as early as possible in stroke recovery.
Health care professionals are using breakfast groups to provide opportunities to practice preparation and consumption of food and drink with enabling support. Consultations with patients and health care professionals have found that the processes involved in breakfast group interventions lack rigour and multi-disciplinary team coordination, thus leading to uncertainty about what outcomes are achieved for each patient.
This co-designed study aims to find out if it is possible to improve patient outcomes by providing more intensive interventions in a breakfast group format delivered by a range of health care professionals over five days of the week. The intervention will be co-designed with a stakeholder group comprising of patients, carers and stroke unit health care professionals supported by an advisory group, comprising of experts in the field. The intervention will be delivered in three sites and it will include a tool kit to support the integrated assessment, care plan and outcome measures.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Follow up Care for People After Minor Stroke
NCT05897905
Stroke, Acute
UNKNOWN
NA
Stroke Self-Management: Effect on Function and Stroke Specific Quality of Life
NCT01507688
Stroke
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Patient-centered Transition Program for Stroke Patients and Their Informal Caregivers, Combining Follow-up by a Case-manager and Access to an Internet Information Platform
NCT05928832
Stroke
UNKNOWN
NA
A Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Adapted Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Group for Stroke Survivors
NCT03295032
Stroke
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
COMPLETED
NA
Study Impact of Nutritional Supplementary Treatment of Undernourished Stroke Patient on Functional Outcome Measures
NCT00332800
Stroke
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will develop a breakfast group intervention for acute stroke services, followed by an exploration of the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention in clinical practice. Feasibility studies are required to build the foundations for future research by exploring the practicalities of intervention delivery and the acceptability from a recipient perspective. The Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework definition for complex interventions has been used to guide study design as breakfast groups are considered to be complex, as they contain several complex interacting components and has a range of possible outcomes which are variable due to the nature of stroke impairments. Purposive or commonly known as selective sampling is an appropriate method for the study as there are only a limited number of primary data sources who can contribute to the study.
Number of sites involved:
* Non-participant Observations Site - 1,2,3
* Interview Sites - 3
* Co-design Site - 1
* Intervention delivery sites - 3
* Focus groups sites - 2
Size of sample Non-participant Observations (Pre-intervention) Site 1 = 10 patients and 7 staff members Interviews Site 1 (pre-intervention) = 2 patients and 2 staff members = 4 Interviews Site 2 and 3 (post intervention) = 6-8 patient across both sites Co-design site 1 = 10 participants in the stakeholder group Intervention delivery and non-participant observations sites 1,2,3 = 15 across 3 sites Focus groups sites 2 and 3 = 6-8 staff members across 2 sites
Total patients= 35 Total Stakeholders = 10 Total Health care professionals = 17 Total participants = 62
Sampling technique Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases with limited resources, relevant to the phenomenon of interest. This involves identifying and selecting individuals or groups of individuals that are especially knowledgeable about or experienced with a phenomenon of interest. Three acute stroke wards in South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Integrated Care System (SYB ICS) will be included in the study therefore availability and willingness to participate, and the ability to communicate experiences are important factors.
Research methods used in the study include in-depth interviews, non-participant observations, co-design stakeholder workshops and focus groups. A strength of Co-design is that tools such as prototypes can be used to engage stakeholders. A prototype intervention and tool-kit will be developed and tested in three stroke wards in SYB ICS (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals FT, Rotherham Hospitals FT and Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals FT).
Co-design of Intervention A Stakeholder Group will be established with key stakeholders including a stroke service manager, National Health Service (NHS) staff (Nurses, Physiotherapists, Speech and Language Therapists, Dieticians, Psychologists, Occupational Therapists, support workers) and two patient representatives. This group will design a breakfast group intervention and co-create an actionable toolkit encompassing an assessment, a personalised care plan and a range of outcomes measures. Frequency and intensity of meetings will vary according to the stage of the project although it is anticipated there will be up to 10, 1 hour meetings (virtual or in person). The stakeholder Group will be recruited using an expression of interest advertisement via Sheffield Stroke Pathway and the local Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Stroke Group. A Study Steering Group will be established with key national and international experts and stroke charities representatives to support study development by proving iterative feedback. The Steering Group will support the study providing guidance and have oversight on the progress of the study to ensure it is conducted rigorously in line with both, governance frameworks and good clinical research practice. The group will meet at key stages during the study and will inform strategic decisions. They will meet online.
Steering Group Participants Two patient representatives and NHS staff (including Occupational Therapists, Physiotherapists, Speech and Language Therapists, Psychologists, Nurses and support staff) will be invited to join ten 1 hour workshops where they will co-design a breakfast group intervention and supporting tool-kit. The tool kit will comprise of an interdisciplinary assessment for eating and drinking difficulties, a care plan with goalsetting and clinical outcome measures. Participants will be recruited with informed consent.
Stakeholder Group Activities Patient journey mapping will be used at the start of the project to delve into the depths of the patient and staff experience. A short film (10 minutes) will be co-created with NHS staff, patients and carers to convey how they experience the current delivery of eating and drinking interventions and their priorities for change. Both patient mapping and the 10-minute film are methods used in experienced-based co-design, a six staged process that uses design thinking and co-design methods, bringing stakeholders together to reflect on their experiences.
Video A short video of six patients and/or carer talking about their eating experiences will be co-created by the researcher. A consent process will take place in accordance with NHS policy. Each participant will be filmed for 30 minutes, and the videos will be edited together in soundbites so that the patient's story is told, and Health Care Professional (HCP) can understand the experience of the service user. Members of the stakeholder group and advisory group will be invited to help in the editing processes. Using Video stories to help others understand the patient experience is a methodology used to co-design.
Non-participant Observations Breakfast interventions and how breakfast is delivered on a stroke ward at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals will be observed on two occasions by the researcher and one other observer from the stakeholder group. They will observe the routines and rituals, how breakfasts are operationally managed, and the type of support provided for patients to eat and drinking during the breakfast period. Patients and staff being observed will have agreed to take part in an informed consent process and the observation will be explicit. They will have been provided with a participant information sheet about the study before informed consent was taken. Observations will be recorded on paper and combined afterwards. Non-participant observations will provide insights into the culture of breakfast on an acute stroke ward, the patterns of behaviours and the social interactions that occur between patients and staff. The participants will be a purposive sample of patients on an acute stroke ward and health care professionals delivering breakfast meals.
There will be three methods of data collection:
* Observe practice- Non-participant observations
* Ask patients about their thoughts, experiences and feelings while observing through informal conversations
* Review the documentation of the breakfast processes and interventions.
The researcher and accompanying stakeholder will keep field notes of observations, jotting down thoughts and experiences making theoretical commentary. These will be used in the future as a reminder of practical issues, solutions, and important issues for intervention design.
Interviews A semi-structured interview with pre-determined topics and open-ended questions be developed by the stakeholder group. Two patients and two members of the stroke team will be interviewed about their experiences of mealtimes on the unit, meal-time interventions and experiences of eating and drinking difficulties. Interviews provide an opportunity to explore the phenomenon of eating and drinking difficulties in-depth, exploring complexity from the perspective of stroke survivors and health care professionals. These can be conducted in person on online participants will be given a choice. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interviews will be flexible and interactive however a consistent approach with an experienced researcher and a well-designed schedule will provide rigour. Two patient and Two staff will be interview pre=intervention design (site 1) and six to eight patients that have participated in the intervention pilot in sites 2 \& 3 will be interviewed in-depth after the pilots are complete.
Intervention delivery/ Non-participant observations The breakfast group intervention will be piloted in site 1 (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals) for 1-2 weeks. It will then be refined and piloted in two further stroke wards (site 2 \& 3) for 2 weeks (Rotherham Hospitals NHS FT and Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals FT). Non-participant structured observation will occur when the first prototype intervention and tool kit is tested in site 1. To inform the development of future data collection and the main study of the intervention structured observations will provide data about interactions in the breakfast group between patients and staff. Two complete observers (the researcher and a stakeholder) will observe the intervention in action recording activities and interactions in a systematic approach using a framework for data collection. This will be developed prior to the observations with the stakeholder group. A framework will facilitate the collection of data in a systematic approach and as far a possible limiting observer bias and subjectivity. A detailed understanding of the intervention in action can contribute to the understanding of the phenomena being investigated. Observations will be used to support data collected through the semi-structured interviews. Observations can help provide a means of recording what actually happens as opposed to what people recall has happened or prevent bias by participants giving socially acceptable responses. They can support self-report data and contribute to the trustworthiness and rigour of a study.
Focus Groups Following intervention pilots in site 2 (Rotherham Hospitals FT) \& 3 (Doncaster and Bassetlaw FT)a focus group consisting of Health Care Professionals involved in the delivery of the intervention will be conducted. Participants will be purposively sampled from the NHS staff taking part in the intervention delivery. They will be recruited as part of the intervention delivery team recruitment from sites 2 \& 3. Informed consent to take part will be obtained. The group will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. If necessary due to COVID-19 restrictions this group will be conducted online. A focus group will be used to obtain views of the health care professionals delivering the intervention. A topic guide for the focus group will be developed with the stakeholder group informed by the aims and objectives of the study. Open-ended questions will be used to elicit views on the intervention delivery, acceptability, and feasibility. Focus groups are a popular method of enquiry in stroke research and will provide in-depth insights into how the health care professionals think and feel about the intervention and toolkit.
Nominal Data Collection NHS Staff- Gender, years of experience in stroke rehabilitation, profession/role Patients- Gender, age, demographic, type of stroke, weeks from stroke, number of interventions received Stakeholders- Gender, role/profession, experience in stroke or lived experience of stroke Patient record- the content of meal-time interventions, number and frequency
Number of sites involved:
* Non-participant Observations Site - 1,2,3
* Interview Sites - 3
* Co-design Site - 1
* Intervention delivery sites - 3
* Focus groups sites - 2
Size of sample Non-participant Observations (Pre-intervention) Site 1 = 10 patients and 7 staff members Interviews Site 1 (pre-intervention) = 2 patients and 2 staff members = 4 Interviews Site 2 and 3 (post intervention) = 6-8 patient across both sites Co-design site 1 = 10 participants in the stakeholder group Intervention delivery and non-participant observations sites 1,2,3 = 15 across 3 sites Focus groups sites 2 and 3 = 6-8 staff members across 2 sites
Total patients= 35 Total Stakeholders = 10 Total Health care professionals = 17 Total participants = 62
Sampling technique Purposeful sampling is widely used in qualitative research for the identification and selection of information-rich cases with limited resources, relevant to the phenomenon of interest. This involves identifying and selecting individuals or groups of individuals that are especially knowledgeable about or experienced with a phenomenon of interest. Three acute stroke wards in South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Integrated Care System (SYB ICS) will be included in the study therefore availability and willingness to participate, and the ability to communicate experiences are important factors.
Research methods used in the study include in-depth interviews, non-participant observations, co-design stakeholder workshops and focus groups. A strength of Co-design is that tools such as prototypes can be used to engage stakeholders. A prototype intervention and tool-kit will be developed and tested in three stroke wards in SYB ICS (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals FT, Rotherham Hospitals FT and Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals FT).
Co-design of Intervention A Stakeholder Group will be established with key stakeholders including a stroke service manager, National Health Service (NHS) staff (Nurses, Physiotherapists, Speech and Language Therapists, Dieticians, Psychologists, Occupational Therapists, support workers) and two patient representatives. This group will design a breakfast group intervention and co-create an actionable toolkit encompassing an assessment, a personalised care plan and a range of outcomes measures. Frequency and intensity of meetings will vary according to the stage of the project although it is anticipated there will be up to 10, 1 hour meetings (virtual or in person). The stakeholder Group will be recruited using an expression of interest advertisement via Sheffield Stroke Pathway and the local Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Stroke Group. A Study Steering Group will be established with key national and international experts and stroke charities representatives to support study development by proving iterative feedback. The Steering Group will support the study providing guidance and have oversight on the progress of the study to ensure it is conducted rigorously in line with both, governance frameworks and good clinical research practice. The group will meet at key stages during the study and will inform strategic decisions. They will meet online.
Steering Group Participants Two patient representatives and NHS staff (including Occupational Therapists, Physiotherapists, Speech and Language Therapists, Psychologists, Nurses and support staff) will be invited to join ten 1 hour workshops where they will co-design a breakfast group intervention and supporting tool-kit. The tool kit will comprise of an interdisciplinary assessment for eating and drinking difficulties, a care plan with goalsetting and clinical outcome measures. Participants will be recruited with informed consent.
Stakeholder Group Activities Patient journey mapping will be used at the start of the project to delve into the depths of the patient and staff experience. A short film (10 minutes) will be co-created with NHS staff, patients and carers to convey how they experience the current delivery of eating and drinking interventions and their priorities for change. Both patient mapping and the 10-minute film are methods used in experienced-based co-design, a six staged process that uses design thinking and co-design methods, bringing stakeholders together to reflect on their experiences.
Video A short video of six patients and/or carer talking about their eating experiences will be co-created by the researcher. A consent process will take place in accordance with NHS policy. Each participant will be filmed for 30 minutes, and the videos will be edited together in soundbites so that the patient's story is told, and Health Care Professional (HCP) can understand the experience of the service user. Members of the stakeholder group and advisory group will be invited to help in the editing processes. Using Video stories to help others understand the patient experience is a methodology used to co-design.
Non-participant Observations Breakfast interventions and how breakfast is delivered on a stroke ward at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals will be observed on two occasions by the researcher and one other observer from the stakeholder group. They will observe the routines and rituals, how breakfasts are operationally managed, and the type of support provided for patients to eat and drinking during the breakfast period. Patients and staff being observed will have agreed to take part in an informed consent process and the observation will be explicit. They will have been provided with a participant information sheet about the study before informed consent was taken. Observations will be recorded on paper and combined afterwards. Non-participant observations will provide insights into the culture of breakfast on an acute stroke ward, the patterns of behaviours and the social interactions that occur between patients and staff. The participants will be a purposive sample of patients on an acute stroke ward and health care professionals delivering breakfast meals.
There will be three methods of data collection:
* Observe practice- Non-participant observations
* Ask patients about their thoughts, experiences and feelings while observing through informal conversations
* Review the documentation of the breakfast processes and interventions.
The researcher and accompanying stakeholder will keep field notes of observations, jotting down thoughts and experiences making theoretical commentary. These will be used in the future as a reminder of practical issues, solutions, and important issues for intervention design.
Interviews A semi-structured interview with pre-determined topics and open-ended questions be developed by the stakeholder group. Two patients and two members of the stroke team will be interviewed about their experiences of mealtimes on the unit, meal-time interventions and experiences of eating and drinking difficulties. Interviews provide an opportunity to explore the phenomenon of eating and drinking difficulties in-depth, exploring complexity from the perspective of stroke survivors and health care professionals. These can be conducted in person on online participants will be given a choice. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interviews will be flexible and interactive however a consistent approach with an experienced researcher and a well-designed schedule will provide rigour. Two patient and Two staff will be interview pre=intervention design (site 1) and six to eight patients that have participated in the intervention pilot in sites 2 \& 3 will be interviewed in-depth after the pilots are complete.
Intervention delivery/ Non-participant observations The breakfast group intervention will be piloted in site 1 (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals) for 1-2 weeks. It will then be refined and piloted in two further stroke wards (site 2 \& 3) for 2 weeks (Rotherham Hospitals NHS FT and Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals FT). Non-participant structured observation will occur when the first prototype intervention and tool kit is tested in site 1. To inform the development of future data collection and the main study of the intervention structured observations will provide data about interactions in the breakfast group between patients and staff. Two complete observers (the researcher and a stakeholder) will observe the intervention in action recording activities and interactions in a systematic approach using a framework for data collection. This will be developed prior to the observations with the stakeholder group. A framework will facilitate the collection of data in a systematic approach and as far a possible limiting observer bias and subjectivity. A detailed understanding of the intervention in action can contribute to the understanding of the phenomena being investigated. Observations will be used to support data collected through the semi-structured interviews. Observations can help provide a means of recording what actually happens as opposed to what people recall has happened or prevent bias by participants giving socially acceptable responses. They can support self-report data and contribute to the trustworthiness and rigour of a study.
Focus Groups Following intervention pilots in site 2 (Rotherham Hospitals FT) \& 3 (Doncaster and Bassetlaw FT)a focus group consisting of Health Care Professionals involved in the delivery of the intervention will be conducted. Participants will be purposively sampled from the NHS staff taking part in the intervention delivery. They will be recruited as part of the intervention delivery team recruitment from sites 2 \& 3. Informed consent to take part will be obtained. The group will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. If necessary due to COVID-19 restrictions this group will be conducted online. A focus group will be used to obtain views of the health care professionals delivering the intervention. A topic guide for the focus group will be developed with the stakeholder group informed by the aims and objectives of the study. Open-ended questions will be used to elicit views on the intervention delivery, acceptability, and feasibility. Focus groups are a popular method of enquiry in stroke research and will provide in-depth insights into how the health care professionals think and feel about the intervention and toolkit.
Nominal Data Collection NHS Staff- Gender, years of experience in stroke rehabilitation, profession/role Patients- Gender, age, demographic, type of stroke, weeks from stroke, number of interventions received Stakeholders- Gender, role/profession, experience in stroke or lived experience of stroke Patient record- the content of meal-time interventions, number and frequency
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Stroke
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Study Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Breakfast Group Intervention
The intervention will be piloted at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for 1-2 weeks. Then will be refined and piloted at tow further stroke wards (Rotherham Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Breakfast Group Intervention
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
An actionable toolkit encompassing an assessment, a personalised care plan and a range of outcome measures.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Breakfast Group Intervention
An actionable toolkit encompassing an assessment, a personalised care plan and a range of outcome measures.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Language: Speaks English sufficient to participate in a group activity
* Clinical Condition: Occurrence of a Stroke which has led to difficulties with performance of eating and drinking activities
* Age range: Over 18 years of age
* Cognition: Mild to moderate impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination MMsE\<15/30) able to consent or a consultee can support consent.
* Location: Inpatient in an acute stroke ward/unit in the United Kingdom
* Language: Speaks English sufficient to participate in a group activity
* Age range: Over 18 years of age
* Location: NHS Staff employed to work on an inpatient acute stroke ward/unit in the United Kingdom
* Experience: Working in stroke rehabilitation
* Clinical Condition: Occurrence of a Stroke which has led to difficulties with performance of eating and drinking activities
* Age range: Over 18 years of age
* Cognition: Mild to moderate impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination MMsE\<15/30) able to consent or a consultee can support consent.
* Location: Inpatient in an acute stroke ward/unit in the United Kingdom
* Language: Speaks English sufficient to participate in a group activity
* Age range: Over 18 years of age
* Location: NHS Staff employed to work on an inpatient acute stroke ward/unit in the United Kingdom
* Experience: Working in stroke rehabilitation
Exclusion Criteria
* No Stroke Diagnosis - Stroke Survivors only
* Outside the stated age range
* Outside the stated location
* Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination MMsE\<15/30 - Stroke Survivors only, or unable to consent with consultee support.
* Outside the stated age range
* Outside the stated location
* Cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination MMsE\<15/30 - Stroke Survivors only, or unable to consent with consultee support.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
100 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sheffield
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Queen's Medical Center
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Doncaster And Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Natalie Jones
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sheffield Pathway Assessment and Rehabilitation Centre
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United Kingdom
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STH20859
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
A Rehabilitation Therapy for Post-stroke Fatigue
NCT02131532
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
Role of Nutrition in Patients Over 75 Years of Age With Stroke
NCT02856009
COMPLETED
NA
Activating Behavior for Lasting Engagement After Stroke
NCT03305731
COMPLETED
NA
Healthy Lifestyles After Stroke - Stroke Coach
NCT02207023
COMPLETED
NA
A Novel Transition Program to Reduce Disability After Stroke
NCT03485820
COMPLETED
NA
Client Centred 'Tune-ups': do They Enhance Community Reintegration After Stroke?
NCT00400712
COMPLETED
NA
Technology Enriched Stroke Rehabilitation in Acute/Sub-acute Stroke
NCT05981729
UNKNOWN
NA
Development and Evaluation of a Patient-centered Transition Program for Stroke Patients, Combining Case Management and Access to an Internet Information Platform
NCT03956160
UNKNOWN
NA
The Effect of Nutrition Counseling on Nutritional Status in Stroke Patients
NCT06208969
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of Fatigue and Recovery After Stroke Depending on the Usual Management With or Without Physical Training
NCT03259932
WITHDRAWN
NA
Needs Assessment and Quality of Life of Stroke Patients and Their Caregivers
NCT03217279
COMPLETED
Evaluation of Whether Functional Strength Training Can Enhance Recovery of Mobility After Stroke
NCT00322192
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Optimizing Stroke Family Caregiver Support Across the Care Continuum by Improving the Timing of Intervention Delivery
NCT00958607
COMPLETED
NA
Effect of a Community Exercise Programme on Stroke Patients
NCT05320549
RECRUITING
NA
Responses to Backward Walking Training Post-Stroke
NCT04928482
RECRUITING
NA
Transitions of Care for Stroke Patients
NCT06011720
RECRUITING
Follow-up of Patients' Physical Activity in Post-hospitalization
NCT01822938
COMPLETED
NA
Post Stroke Intensive Rehabilitation
NCT03866057
UNKNOWN
Community Participation Transition After Stroke
NCT02396589
COMPLETED
NA
Patient Engagement Program for Stroke - Pilot Study
NCT01112488
UNKNOWN
NA
MONitoring Sedentary Behavior and Light Physical Activity in Patients With Stroke
NCT05793177
RECRUITING
NA
Effects of a Self-Management Group-Intervention on Participation in Post-Stroke Patients.
NCT02289287
TERMINATED
NA
Evaluation of an Adapted ACT Group for Stroke & Brain Injury Survivors
NCT04995705
TERMINATED
NA
Feasibility of a Stroke Specific Self-management Program
NCT03993574
UNKNOWN
NA