Development and Evaluation of a Patient-centered Transition Program for Stroke Patients, Combining Case Management and Access to an Internet Information Platform
NCT ID: NCT03956160
Last Updated: 2021-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-30
2022-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigating team's hypothesis is that, through comprehensive, individualized and flexible support for patients and their caregivers, a patient-centred post-stroke hospital/home transition program, combining an Internet platform and telephone follow-up by a case-manager, could improve patients' level of participation and quality of life.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Feasibility of a Patient-centered Transition Program for Stroke Patients and Their Informal Caregivers, Combining Follow-up by a Case-manager and Access to an Internet Information Platform
NCT05928832
Evaluation of the Impact of an Individual Peer Support Intervention for Stroke Patients When Returning Home: a Mixed Methods Pilot Study
NCT04197258
Needs Assessment and Quality of Life of Stroke Patients and Their Caregivers
NCT03217279
A Rehabilitation Program Based on Daily Activities in Patients With Cerebrovascular Accident
NCT05772663
Stroke Self-Management: Effect on Function and Stroke Specific Quality of Life
NCT01507688
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients and caregivers report a significant need for advice and information during this transition period. They are looking for individualized, good quality information and whose nature evolves over time with the needs and recovery of the patient. Thus, the provision of information through an Internet platform could meet these characteristics, in association with individualised support by a case-manager to ensure continuity of care and improve care pathway. In France, no such program has been developed to date for stroke. Existing transition programmes mainly focus on home rehabilitation and do not offer a comprehensive approach to the situation, integrating caregivers. In addition, no programs have been developed in partnership with patients and families to best meet their needs.
The investigator's hypothesis is that, through comprehensive, individualized and flexible support for patients and their caregivers, a patient-centred post-stroke hospital/home transition program, combining an Internet platform and telephone follow-up by a case-manager, could improve patients' level of participation and quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
For 12 months from the return home, patients in the intervention group will benefit from telephone support by a trained case-manager (number and frequency of contacts defined according to the patient's needs) and access to an Internet platform.
The intervention aims to improve the patient's ability to manage his or her situation and meet his or her needs upon return home, including identifying and requesting the necessary health or social resources.
A co-design phase aims to ensure the feasibility and relevance of the proposed intervention and evaluation.
4 participatory co-design workshops lasting 4 hours each that will follow a "user-centered design" approach: identification of end-user needs, prototyping/development of the intervention (case-management procedures and platform), iterative improvement, end-user testing.
Based on the cognitive social theory underpinning the intervention, scientific literature, an overview of existing organizations and the results of the Stroke 69 and Arthur Tybra studies (patient needs following the acute phase), the advisory committee will:
* Define the case-manager's profile, and required knowledge and skills
* Identify the resources and tools to be proposed on the Internet platform
* Test the tools and content
* Refine the program evaluation criteria
* Test and validate the study procedures.
Control group
Patients randomized to the control group will receive the usual practices. As part of the study, they will be contacted for data collection upon their return home, at 6 months and 12 months by a clinical research associate.
Access to the internet platform and an interview with the case-manager will be offered at the end of the study to patients in the control group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
A co-design phase aims to ensure the feasibility and relevance of the proposed intervention and evaluation.
4 participatory co-design workshops lasting 4 hours each that will follow a "user-centered design" approach: identification of end-user needs, prototyping/development of the intervention (case-management procedures and platform), iterative improvement, end-user testing.
Based on the cognitive social theory underpinning the intervention, scientific literature, an overview of existing organizations and the results of the Stroke 69 and Arthur Tybra studies (patient needs following the acute phase), the advisory committee will:
* Define the case-manager's profile, and required knowledge and skills
* Identify the resources and tools to be proposed on the Internet platform
* Test the tools and content
* Refine the program evaluation criteria
* Test and validate the study procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having had a first confirmed, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
* Managed in the participating stroke center
* Whose return home directly from the stroke center is planned
* Presenting a modified Rankin score of 1 to 3 when deciding to leave the stroke center
* Having given its written consent
* Whose main residence is located in the Rhône department of France
* Aphasic patients may be included if a caregiver can follow up with the case manager
Exclusion Criteria
* Supported in the gerontological field before stroke
* Inability to communicate by telephone with the case-manager and absence of a caregiver to follow up by telephone with the case-manager
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Julie Haesebaert, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Termoz A, Delvallee M, Damiolini E, Marchal M, Preau M, Huchon L, Mazza S, Habchi O, Bravant E, Derex L, Nighoghossian N, Cakmak S, Rabilloud M, Denis A, Schott AM, Haesebaert J. Co-design and evaluation of a patient-centred transition programme for stroke patients, combining case management and access to an internet information platform: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - NAVISTROKE. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07907-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
69HCL19_0042
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.