Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-22
2022-02-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Influence of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation
NCT04710992
Unmodulated 5 Kilohertz Currents Versus TENS: Effect on Pain Thresholds, Tactile Threshold, and Nerve Conduction
NCT02320838
Dry Needling Versus Percutaneous Electrolysis in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
NCT06505161
Effectiveness Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPI) in Patient With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04290221
Echo-guided Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation of the Femoral Nerve
NCT06894537
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sham intervention
The needle will be inserted for 90 seconds without galvanic current.
Sham intervention
The needle will be inserted into the right common extensor tendon of the epicondyle for 90 seconds without galvanic current.
Low intensity percutaneous electrolysis
Galvanic current will be applied with an intensity of 0.3 mA for 90 seconds.
Low intensity percutaneous electrolysis
A single impact of galvanic current will be applied in the common extensor tendon of the epicondyle (right side) with an intensity of 0.3 mA for 90 seconds.
High intensity percutaneous electrolysis
Participants will receive three impacts of galvanic current with an intensity of 3 mA for 3 seconds each.
High intensity percutaneous electrolysis
Three impacts of galvanic current will be applied in the common extensor tendon of the epicondyle (right side) with an intensity of 3 mA and a duration of 3 seconds each.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sham intervention
The needle will be inserted into the right common extensor tendon of the epicondyle for 90 seconds without galvanic current.
Low intensity percutaneous electrolysis
A single impact of galvanic current will be applied in the common extensor tendon of the epicondyle (right side) with an intensity of 0.3 mA for 90 seconds.
High intensity percutaneous electrolysis
Three impacts of galvanic current will be applied in the common extensor tendon of the epicondyle (right side) with an intensity of 3 mA and a duration of 3 seconds each.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signature of the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Any pathology or process that causes pain
* Neurological, rheumatologic, cardiovascular or metabolic diseases
* Cutaneous alterations and cognitive or sensitivity disorders
* Pregnancy
* Recent intake of alcohol or caffeine
* Vigorous physical activity on the day of testing
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Salamanca
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sergio Varela RodrÃguez
PhD candidate
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Facultad de EnfermerÃa y Fisioterapia de la Universidad de Salamanca
Salamanca, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Miguel Valtierra L, Salom Moreno J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Arias-Buria JL. Ultrasound-Guided Application of Percutaneous Electrolysis as an Adjunct to Exercise and Manual Therapy for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pain. 2018 Oct;19(10):1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 May 16.
Garcia Bermejo P, De La Cruz Torres B, Naranjo Orellana J, Albornoz Cabello M. Autonomic Responses to Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Electrolysis: Effect of Needle Puncture or Electrical Current? J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Jan;24(1):69-75. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0339. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Cagnie B, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Timmermans F, Delrue N, Meeus M. Physiologic effects of dry needling. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Aug;17(8):348. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0348-5.
Abat F, Valles SL, Gelber PE, Polidori F, Stitik TP, Garcia-Herreros S, Monllau JC, Sanchez-Ibanez JM. [Molecular repair mechanisms using the Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis technique in patellar tendonitis]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;58(4):201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 May 10. Spanish.
Abat F, Gelber PE, Polidori F, Monllau JC, Sanchez-Ibanez JM. Clinical results after ultrasound-guided intratissue percutaneous electrolysis (EPI(R)) and eccentric exercise in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Apr;23(4):1046-52. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2855-2. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
Yarnitsky D, Bouhassira D, Drewes AM, Fillingim RB, Granot M, Hansson P, Landau R, Marchand S, Matre D, Nilsen KB, Stubhaug A, Treede RD, Wilder-Smith OH. Recommendations on practice of conditioned pain modulation (CPM) testing. Eur J Pain. 2015 Jul;19(6):805-6. doi: 10.1002/ejp.605. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EP550
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.