Treatment of Neovascular AMD: Artificial Intelligence in Real-world Setting
NCT ID: NCT05093374
Last Updated: 2024-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
290 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Follow-up of Subfoveal Neovascular AMD
NCT01608113
Assessment of Proactive Treatments in Patients With Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) Which Have Never Undergone Treatment of This Particular Disease
NCT03939767
NVAMD Satellite Study
NCT02251366
Recurrent Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration After Therapy Suspension
NCT04659512
Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal LFG316 in Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
NCT01535950
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a major role in the pathomechanisms of nAMD and large multicenter trials have shown that intravitreal application of substances which intercept the VEGF pathway can interrupt the progression of nAMD and improve the visual outcome.
As every single injection bears the risk of sight-threatening complications and increases the financial burden to health care providers, several studies have tested different treatment regimens, to decrease the number of applicated injections without compromising the gains in visual acuity. Thereby, strict protocols have been compared to flexible "as needed" regimens (pro re nata, PRN) and regimens with proactive increments of injection intervals (treat and extend, T\&E).
Studies have indicated that the outcome of anti-VEGF treatment is better in standardized clinical trials than in so-called "real world settings". This is explained by tight exclusion criteria of sponsored trials, the shorter follow-up time and the small number of patients that are treated per center, resulting in a better standard of care.
PRN as well as T\&E management showed disadvantages such as significant less vision gain in PRN and possible over treatment in T\&E.
Recently, additional treatment criteria were described to improve the patients care.
Advances in diagnostic precision by SD-OCT using automated algorithms to accurately measure fluid volumes in all compartments are solid tools to determine disease activity. They allow to precisely quantifying the impact of therapeutic parameters on disease activity.
Multicenter study analyses have shown that the amount of intraretinal fluid has a significant effect on vision outcome. Subretinal fluid or Pigmentepithelial detachment have been described to be less important. These findings were the basis for designing an efficient point-of-care management. Automated quantification of the fluid amount using artificial intelligence (AI) may serve as a reliable and objective method to determine the personalized point-of-care.
To prove the efficacy of point-of-care management, prospective studies in real-world settings are required. More data is required to assess the outcome of real-world settings and find ways to improve treatment results, when larger amounts of patients are treated and less resources are available for decision making.
The purpose of this study is to implement quantitative assessment tools for the treatment of neovascular AMD patients in a real-world setting in order to provide advantages for both patients (treatment burden) and healthcare system (scheduling visits/treatments).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort 1 - Quantitative
Patients will undergo monthly follow-up visits including fluid quantification and will be retreated in case of active disease, which is defined as:
* reduction of 5 EDTRS letters or more related to any (suspected) neovascular activity compared to previous visit
* new sub-retinal hemorrhage
* increase \>50% in IRF volume in the central 1 mm compared to month 2
* increase \> 50 % in SRF volume in the central 1 mm compared to month 2
* in case of NO intra- and/or subretinal fluid (=less than 10nl) in visits 2 or 3, retreat if fluid in central 1mm ≥ 10nl
Presence/change of sub- and intraretinal fluid will be assessed objectively by AI software and the results will be provided during the visit to the investigator. The final decision for/against retreatment is always made by the discretion of the clinical investigator.
anti-VEGF agent
All patients will be treated at baseline. A loading dose of 2 additionally monthly treatments will be performed at months 1 and 2. Patients showing no intra- and/or subretinal fluid in the central 1mm subfield at month 1, no treatment will be given till any disease activity is documented.
Presence/change of sub- and intraretinal fluid will be assessed objectively by AI software and the results will be provided during the visit to the investigator. The final decision for/against retreatment is always made by the discretion of the clinical investigator. Should the Investigators decision differ from the study protocol, the reason will be indicated in the CRF.
Cohort 2 - Qualitative
Patients will undergo monthly follow-up visits. Treatment will be performed in case of active disease, which is defined as:
* reduction of 5 EDTRS letters or more related to any (suspected) neovascular activity
* new sub-retinal hemorrhage
* any fluid
In this cohort the amount of retinal fluid will not be assessed by AI software at the time of retreatment.
anti-VEGF agent
All patients will be treated at baseline. A loading dose of 2 additionally monthly treatments will be performed at months 1 and 2. Patients showing no intra- and/or subretinal fluid in the central 1mm subfield at month 1, no treatment will be given till any disease activity is documented.
In this cohort the amount of retinal fluid will not be assessed by AI software at the time of retreatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
anti-VEGF agent
All patients will be treated at baseline. A loading dose of 2 additionally monthly treatments will be performed at months 1 and 2. Patients showing no intra- and/or subretinal fluid in the central 1mm subfield at month 1, no treatment will be given till any disease activity is documented.
Presence/change of sub- and intraretinal fluid will be assessed objectively by AI software and the results will be provided during the visit to the investigator. The final decision for/against retreatment is always made by the discretion of the clinical investigator. Should the Investigators decision differ from the study protocol, the reason will be indicated in the CRF.
anti-VEGF agent
All patients will be treated at baseline. A loading dose of 2 additionally monthly treatments will be performed at months 1 and 2. Patients showing no intra- and/or subretinal fluid in the central 1mm subfield at month 1, no treatment will be given till any disease activity is documented.
In this cohort the amount of retinal fluid will not be assessed by AI software at the time of retreatment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Active neovascular AMD (classic, occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV), RAP lesion or PCV lesion) assessed by OCT, OCTA, FA
* Patients who have a BCVA score better or equal 0.1 (20/200) in the study eye using ETDRS
* No significant fibrosis or geographic atrophy (GA) involving the fovea
* Willingness and ability to comply with study visits and study procedures
* Signed informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Any surgical treatment of the eye within 3 months prior to baseline in the study eye
* History of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (Irvine Gass Syndrome)
* History of glaucoma filtration surgery, corneal transplant surgery or extracapsular extraction of cataract with phacoemulsification within six months preceding Visit 0, or a history of post-operative complications within the last 12 months preceding Visit 0 in the study eye (uveitis, cyclitis etc.)
* History of uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 25 mmHg despite treatment with IOP lowering medication), or C/D Ratio \>0,9
* Aphakia in the study eye
* Presence of a retinal pigment epithelial tear involving the macula in the study eye
* Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye (e.g. advanced cataract or diabetic retinopathy) that, in the opinion of the investigator, will most likely require medical or surgical intervention during the twelve-month study period to prevent or treat visual loss that might result from that condition
* Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye
* Active or suspected ocular or periocular infection in the study eye
* Vitreous hemorrhage or history of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole in the study eye
* Current iris neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage, or tractional retinal detachment
* Evidence of current infectious blepharitis, keratitis, scleritis, or conjunctivitis in either eye
* Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, could cause an unwanted effect on treatment efficacy, compliance or require intraocular surgery (except for cataract surgery) during the study period
* Presence of corneal decompensation, haze or scaring with an impact on BCVA
50 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Vienna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stefan Sacu
Head of Vienna Clinical Trial Center, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Optometry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefan Sacu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Optometry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Stefan Sacu, Associate Professor, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1672_2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.