" Socially Pertinent Robot in Gerontological Healthcare "
NCT ID: NCT05089799
Last Updated: 2025-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
115 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-10-20
2024-07-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Socially Assistive Robots for Long Term Care Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment and Apathy
NCT05178992
SimpleC Wellness Platform With Social Robot Interaction (Long-term)
NCT05599503
Social Robot Support for Healthcare Professionals
NCT03857789
SimpleC Wellness Platform With Social Robot Interaction
NCT05296239
Measuring the Impact of a Socially Assistive Robot
NCT04848155
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The SPRING study is a non-interventional study that does not include objectives for improving health or patient care. It is an exploratory study targeting five use cases with a social robot and three populations of care hospital users (patients, informal or family caregivers and professionals). No follow-up of the participants is necessary.
The main objective of SPRING is to study the acceptability of socially assistive robots among three actors in a hospital service: patients, informal or family caregivers and professionals. The secondary objectives are to study a) the usability of the ARI robot among day care hospital's users which is necessary to understand the efficiency of using the robot in this context; b) the organisational impact of the robot on the operation of the service among day care hospital's professionals ; c) the ethical questions generated by the presence of the robot with the participants that will allow us to extend our understanding of the determinants of the rejection or adoption of new technologies in the hospital context.
During this non-interventional and exploratory research, the ARI robot will be tested in the waiting room of a day care hospital in a geriatric hospital regarding five use cases (1/welcoming patients and family members to the hospital, 2/ providing a reminder how to follow sanitary gestures for the prevention of virus transmission, 3/providing patients an assistance to prepare for the medical consultation that will follow during the day, 4/ providing orientation and guidance in relation to the location (hospital) and the services available (toilets, cafeteria, elevators, etc.) and 5/Providing entertainment to patients and families during the waiting time.
Patients and their family caregivers meet the robot only once. They answer questionnaires and participate in semi-structured interviews after interacting with the robot. Evaluations target the acceptability, usability and ethical issues raised by the presence of a robotic agent in support of care teams.
The professionals included in the study meet the robot several times according to their professional obligations (hospital practitioners are not present every day at the day care hospital and can choose when to interact with the robot). They will be invited to participate in two focus groups, one before the introduction of the robot and the other one at the end of the study. At the end of the study, the investigators will offer them to fill in questionnaires and participate in semi-structured interviews. The evaluations proposed to the professionals deal with questions of acceptability, usability, organisational impact of the robot's presence, and ethical issues related to its presence in the day care hospital.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
Older adults 60 years old or older They are referred to the day care hospital for memory problems or frailty and may present with various cognitive, behavioural, mental and physical disorders.
Persons in this group are diverse in socio-cultural levels. The investigators expect to include 100 patients (N = 100). Each patient will test 1 out of the 5 use cases, so 20 patients will test the same use case (n = 20).
Exposure and interaction with a socially assistive robot
Description of scenarios involving robot and users
1. welcoming patients and family members l: the robot explains its own functionalities and answers persons 'questions.
2. providing a reminder about sanitary gestures (prevention of virus transmission). In addition, it could mediate a conversation between two or more people so that they keep the appropriate physical distance between them.
3. providing patients with an assistance to prepare the medical consultations : the robot helps patients to fill in paper forms for professionals. The robot also provides information on the course of consultations and the users 'rights in the hospital.
4. providing orientation and guidance to the consultation rooms and the available services : the robot helps people to find their way around the hospital.
5. Providing entertainment to patients and families during the waiting time: the robot offers activities to patients and caregivers
Informal carers or family caregivers
This group includes persons who accompany patients during the hospital visit, such as family members (spouses or children) and friends.
They provide support to the patient with various frequency and intensity (occasional / regular / continuous).
Persons in this group are diverse in age and socio-cultural levels. They may also suffer from physical and/or psychological disorders.
The investigators expect to include 100 informal or family caregivers (N = 100). Each one will test 1 out of the 5 use cases, so 20 informal or family caregivers will test the same use case (n= 20).
Exposure and interaction with a socially assistive robot
Description of scenarios involving robot and users
1. welcoming patients and family members l: the robot explains its own functionalities and answers persons 'questions.
2. providing a reminder about sanitary gestures (prevention of virus transmission). In addition, it could mediate a conversation between two or more people so that they keep the appropriate physical distance between them.
3. providing patients with an assistance to prepare the medical consultations : the robot helps patients to fill in paper forms for professionals. The robot also provides information on the course of consultations and the users 'rights in the hospital.
4. providing orientation and guidance to the consultation rooms and the available services : the robot helps people to find their way around the hospital.
5. Providing entertainment to patients and families during the waiting time: the robot offers activities to patients and caregivers
Professionals
All categories of professionals working in the day care hospital. Persons in this group belong to different professional categories (administrative, health, technical). They have different levels of proximity with the public and have various positions in the hospital.
The investigators expect to include 50 professionals.
Exposure and interaction with a socially assistive robot
Description of scenarios involving robot and users
1. welcoming patients and family members l: the robot explains its own functionalities and answers persons 'questions.
2. providing a reminder about sanitary gestures (prevention of virus transmission). In addition, it could mediate a conversation between two or more people so that they keep the appropriate physical distance between them.
3. providing patients with an assistance to prepare the medical consultations : the robot helps patients to fill in paper forms for professionals. The robot also provides information on the course of consultations and the users 'rights in the hospital.
4. providing orientation and guidance to the consultation rooms and the available services : the robot helps people to find their way around the hospital.
5. Providing entertainment to patients and families during the waiting time: the robot offers activities to patients and caregivers
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exposure and interaction with a socially assistive robot
Description of scenarios involving robot and users
1. welcoming patients and family members l: the robot explains its own functionalities and answers persons 'questions.
2. providing a reminder about sanitary gestures (prevention of virus transmission). In addition, it could mediate a conversation between two or more people so that they keep the appropriate physical distance between them.
3. providing patients with an assistance to prepare the medical consultations : the robot helps patients to fill in paper forms for professionals. The robot also provides information on the course of consultations and the users 'rights in the hospital.
4. providing orientation and guidance to the consultation rooms and the available services : the robot helps people to find their way around the hospital.
5. Providing entertainment to patients and families during the waiting time: the robot offers activities to patients and caregivers
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 60 and over
* Enough knowledge in French language
* Without distinction of gender, socio-professional categories or ethnic origin
* MMSE \> 10
* No symptoms of altered reality (delirium, hallucination, frontal disinhibition, etc.).
* Having expressed his/her non-opposition to his/her participation in the study or to being in the presence of the robot
* If the persons are protected adults under guardianship, the tutor or legal guardian has expressed his/her non-opposition to participate in the study or to be in the presence of the robot for the person concerned.
* ACCOMPANYING PERSONS
* They are all adults who have enough knowledge in French language.
* They are enrolled without distinction of gender, socio-professional categories or ethnic origin
* They have expressed his/her non-opposition to participate in the study
* PROFESSIONALS:
* Age 18 and over.
* Has expressed his/her non-opposition to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* They have expressed, or where applicable, their family, guardian or legal representative, their opposition to participate in the study or their opposition to be in the presence of the robot.
* PAtients benefiying of Medical State Aid (French AME)
* ACCOMPANYING PERSONS They are under 18. They do not have enough knowledge in French language to understand simple instructions. They have expressed their opposition to participate in the study or their opposition to be in the presence of the robot.
* PROFESSIONNALS They have expressed their opposition to participate in the study or their opposition to be in the presence of the robot.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique
OTHER
Università degli Studi di Trento
OTHER
Czech Technical University in Prague
OTHER
Heriot-Watt University
OTHER
ERM Automatismes Industriels (ERM)
UNKNOWN
Pal Robotics SL (PAL)
UNKNOWN
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
RIGAUD Anne-Sophie
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) - Broca Hospital - Geriatric unit
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blavette L, Dacunha S, Alameda-Pineda X, Hernandez Garcia D, Gannot S, Gras F, Gunson N, Lemaignan S, Polic M, Tandeitnik P, Tonini F, Rigaud AS, Pino M. Acceptability and Usability of a Socially Assistive Robot Integrated With a Large Language Model for Enhanced Human-Robot Interaction in a Geriatric Care Institution: Mixed Methods Evaluation. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 1;12:e76496. doi: 10.2196/76496.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
The page presents the SPRING project and all the contributors of the project.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP201352
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.