Migration Rates of Sutured vs Non-sutured Esophageal Stent Placement

NCT ID: NCT05082948

Last Updated: 2024-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-20

Study Completion Date

2023-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

No standard approach currently exists for endoscopic esophageal stent placement, and both sutured and un-sutured techniques are employed for esophageal stent placement currently. The primary purpose of this study is to find out if suture fixation of esophageal stents is superior to non-suture fixated stent placement.

Consecutive patients who are scheduled for esophageal stent placement will be identified as potential study participants by study personnel and will be approached on the day of the procedure. Informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized into suture fixation and non-suture fixation groups. Patients in the suture fixation group will have their esophageal stent secured in location with two endoscopic sutures. Those in the non-suture fixation group will have no sutures placed. Main study outcome is stent migration, and rates of stent migration will be compared in the two groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Esophageal stents are commonly placed for both benign and malignant etiologies. Uncovered or partially covered metal stents are employed for malignant conditions while fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FC-SEMSs) are generally placed for the management of benign conditions. FC-SEMSs are also commonly used for managing perforations, fistulae as well as for palliation of symptoms that result from benign structuring disease. Due to the difficulty of uncovered stent removal, FC-SEMSs and partially covered self-expanding metal stents (PC-SEMS) are increasingly utilized for patients with malignancy undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Stent migration remains the most frequently encountered complication and the main drawback to their use. While some tissue in-growth is expected in the uncovered metal stents with resulting stability, the silicone coating in covered SEMSs, and to some degree in partially covered stents prevents ingrowth, resulting in higher rates of stent migration; rates exceeding 40% are reported in current scientific literature.2 In recent years, suture fixation of stents has been explored for migration mitigation however data is limited to retrospective series and real-world practice varies depending on endoscopist expertise and experience.

The OverStitch Endoscopic Suturing System (Apollo Endosurgery Incorporation, Austin, TX) is an FDA approved endoscopic suturing system initially designed for closure of gut wall during NOTES procedures,3 however it is now commonly employed for closing perforations, leaks, and has recently garnered attention for stent fixation by suturing in place. At West Virginia University, this device is used, depending on endoscopist preference, to suture esophageal stents to prevent migration. The Investigators aim to perform a randomized clinical trial of endoscopic suture fixated and un-sutured stent placement and compare stent migration rates, technical success, clinical success, and adverse events along with healthcare cost utilization in the two groups.

A randomized controlled trial will be performed at WVU Ruby Memorial Hospital. Patients who are scheduled for esophageal stent placement will be identified as potential study participants by study personnel and will be approached by study personnel on the day of the procedure. Eligibility will be confirmed, and study procedures will be explained. After informed consent is obtained, the patient will be randomized to one of the two groups and the endoscopy will be informed. Each group will consist of 30 patients.

Esophageal stent will be placed in the standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard Olympus gastroscopes. 18 to 23 mm covered self-expanding metal stent will be placed as per endoscopist preference. After esophageal stent placement, endoscopic suturing will be performed in cases of patients randomized to suture fixation.

Suture securement of the esophageal stents will be performed using commercially available devices. All endoscopes, and suturing devices will be used in accordance with appropriate Directions for Use (DFU) provided by the manufacturer. The OverStitch Endoscopic Suturing System (Apollo Endosurgery Incorporation, Austin, TX) is an FDA approved endoscopic suturing system that will be utilized in the suture fixation cohort. Standard scope reprocessing will be performed as per institutional protocol after use.

Baseline chest radiographs will be obtained within one week of stent placement. Repeat radiographs to assess the esophageal stents will be obtained at 4-12 weeks after stent placement or in the event of worsening or new symptoms. Chest Xrays will be assessed by attending consultant radiologist and stent positioning will be determined by comparison to local anatomic skeletal landmarks.

All patients will be contacted by the study team by telephone 30 days after procedure to assess for any ongoing symptoms or adverse events. Information on unplanned visits including unplanned emergency department visits or inpatient admissions will also be collected. Electronic health records of patients will be reviewed at 30 days after procedure for obtaining information on unplanned ED visits, or inpatient visits.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dysphagia, Esophageal Esophageal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suture arm

Esophageal stent will be placed in standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard gastroscopes. After esophageal stent placement, endoscopic suturing will be performed in cases of patients randomized to suture fixation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Suture fixation of stent

Intervention Type OTHER

Esophageal stent will be placed in the standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard gastroscopes. Covered self-expanding metal stent will be placed as per endoscopist preference. After esophageal stent placement, endoscopic suturing will be performed in cases of patients randomized to suture fixation.

Non-suture

Esophageal stent will be placed in standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard gastroscopes. No sutures will be placed to fixate the stent

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Non suture

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard placement of stent without suture fixation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suture fixation of stent

Esophageal stent will be placed in the standard of care fashion by the endoscopists using standard gastroscopes. Covered self-expanding metal stent will be placed as per endoscopist preference. After esophageal stent placement, endoscopic suturing will be performed in cases of patients randomized to suture fixation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Non suture

Standard placement of stent without suture fixation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able to provide informed consent
* Indication for esophageal stent placement

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of any contraindication to esophageal stent placement
* Incarceration
* Inability to tolerate anesthesia
* Pregnant status
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West Virginia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shailendra Singh

Associate Professor & Director, Bariatric Endoscopy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shailendra Singh

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

West Virginia University

Arunkumar Krishnan

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

West Virginia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West Virginia University

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singh S, Maan S, Hadi Y, Agrawal R, Adekolu AA, Cohen EM, Ali FS, Fang W, Markovich B, Krafft M, Thakkar S. Endoscopic suturing to prevent migration of esophageal fully covered self-expandable metal stents: a randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Oct;102(4):525-535.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.02.037. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40024292 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2101223876

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.