Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
410 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-01
2025-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The treatment will be integrated into the nationally available 1177 web-platform, which will facilitate long-term use in clinical practice across Sweden. Within the project, the investigators will develop the digital treatment and match it to patients' needs using focus groups; pilot the treatment to evaluate its feasibility and acceptability, preliminary efficacy, and individual change processes using the single case experimental design (SCED) method; conduct a two-armed randomized controlled trial enhanced with SCED to assess the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and maintenance of change of the treatment compared to treatment as usual; and monitor the implementation process of the treatment through a business model and stakeholder interviews.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Self-Management of Chronic Pain
NCT04837794
E-health for Self-Management of Chronic Pain
NCT04628650
Management of Chronic Pain
NCT04865263
Impact of QoLibri Medical Device on the Consequences of Chronic Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06841276
Chronic Widespread Pain
NCT04942132
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study 3: Feasibility, acceptability, preliminary efficacy, and individual change processes Design: Piloting and optimising the treatment in an iterative process with 4-6 smaller cohorts; user input from each optimisation 'sprint' will be integrated and tested in the subsequent cohort/ sprint; single-case experimental design (SCED) method with randomised baseline length, pre- post- and FU-assessment and post-treatment user interviews. Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability, the preliminary efficacy, and individual change processes of the digital behavioural health treatment within the 1177 web-platform. Sample: People with chronic pain (n=10 per sprint; total of n=60) will be recruited from primary care facilities in the region of Kalmar; the feasibility and acceptability will also be evaluated in treating HCPs (note: one HCP might treat multiple patients at the same time, and also take place in several sprints), who are therefore also considered participants. Data collection: feasibility/ acceptability: semi-structured debriefing interviews of subjective experience combined with objective measures such as drop-out rate, adherence, system-generated technical use e.g. number of log-in time points, number of modules completed; preliminary efficacy: Pre-, post- 3- and 6-month FU-assessment of self-reports on patients' well-being, data of n=60 patients accumulated across all sprints as the treatment remains functionally constant across all optimisation studies; individual change processes: Lunch and evening reports of well-being at least four times per week over the course of the 6-week treatment using a digital diary, also comparing to the baseline and post-treatment diary assessments. Time plan: 2022.
Study 4: RCT enhanced with SCED evaluating the (cost-) effectiveness and maintenance of change Design: Two-armed RCT enhanced with randomized baseline length SCED method comparing the digital behavioural health treatment to primary care treatment as usual (TAU). Aims: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the treatment on behavioural health outcomes, and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment in comparison to TAU. Sample: Patients (n=360, n=180 per group) will be recruited from pain clinics and primary care facilities in the region of Kalmar and potentially other regions (e.g., Östergötland, Jönköping, Stockholm, Uppsala, Örebro). Data collection: Self-report questionnaires will be completed over pre-, post- FU-assessments. Furthermore, the digital diary information on daily well-being will be collected at all assessment time points and over the course of the intervention, in both treatment arms. To determine the cost-effectiveness, information from registers on sick leave, medication, and health care consumption will be used . Time plan: 2023-2024.
Study 2 (pre-Implementation) and study 5 (post-implementation): business model, determinants, and lessons-learned Design: Qualitative study using interviews with stakeholders; deductive analysis of qualitative data mapped on the consolidated framework for implementation research. Aim: Identify barriers and facilitators for the prospective implementation of the treatment and prepare the implementation process using a business model canvas (at baseline, study 2); review the actual use and implementation process at follow-up to present lessons learned (at follow-up, study 5). Sample: Various stakeholders identified via snowball-sampling (e.g., development team and facilitators of 1177 web platform at region Kalmar, health care professionals, health care managers, municipality representatives). Interviews will be conducted until data satisfaction is achieved. Data collection: An initial version of a business model canvas will be discussed with the development team and health care managers. Furthermore, potential barriers and facilitators of prospective use will be identified at baseline via a semi-structured interview with the stakeholders. The practical use and implementation status after the treatment is released to the market (here also referred to as follow-up (FU)) will be described using semi-structured interviews to understand the process retrospectively and present lessons learned. Time plan: baseline autumn 2021, FU in autumn 2024 (after RCT, treatment release to other regions).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DAHLIA treatment
6 weeks of online behavioural treatment; mainly self-guided and weekly contact with their therapist
DAHLIA treatment
6 weeks; CBT/ ACT/ process-based treatment; micro-learning format with 4 digital micro-sessions per week; exposure as the core process; guidance to be OPEN, AWARE, ACTIVE; weekly contact with therapist; booster sessions after 2- and 4 months;
Treatment as usual
receive usual treatment at their rehabilitation centre; detailed information will be collected to define what treatment as usual means in clinical settings.
Treatment as usual
Usual pain treatment; defined post-hoc based on what patients receive
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DAHLIA treatment
6 weeks; CBT/ ACT/ process-based treatment; micro-learning format with 4 digital micro-sessions per week; exposure as the core process; guidance to be OPEN, AWARE, ACTIVE; weekly contact with therapist; booster sessions after 2- and 4 months;
Treatment as usual
Usual pain treatment; defined post-hoc based on what patients receive
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. be 18 to 65 years of age
2. reporting a pain duration of ≥ 3 months
3. being able to communicate in Swedish
4. having access to a computer, smartphone, and the internet in their home environment.
Exclusion Criteria
1. be injury or illness that require immediate assessment or different treatment, or is expected to progress significantly during the next 6 months
2. taking unstable medication (i.e., changes in medication during the past 3 months or expected within the next 3 months)
3. having received previous CBT treatment (including ACT) during the past 6 months
4. havning severe psychiatric co-morbidity (e.g., high risk of suicide)
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University
OTHER
Linnaeus University
OTHER
Örebro University, Sweden
OTHER
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sara Lauren Bartels
Postdoctoral researcher; Principle Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sara Laureen Bartels, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Psykisk hälsa
Kalmar, , Sweden
Rehab Söder
Kalmar, , Sweden
Samrehab
Kalmar, , Sweden
Capio St Görans Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bartels SL, Johnsson SI, Boersma K, Flink I, McCracken LM, Petersson S, Christie HL, Feldman I, Simons LE, Onghena P, Vlaeyen JWS, Wicksell RK. Development, evaluation and implementation of a digital behavioural health treatment for chronic pain: study protocol of the multiphase DAHLIA project. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e059152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059152.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Research group website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dnr 2021-02437
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.