Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-02
2018-06-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Nurses play an important role in ensuring the management of COPD, supporting patients to continue their activities of daily living, and increasing their self-efficacy levels. Nursing care that includes patient education and counseling is important in providing disease management and symptom control, and increasing the self-efficacy levels of patients. During self-management training, it is necessary to ensure that the patient is an active participant, to use a motivating communication style in the behavior change process and to encourage patients. In this process, it is stated that it is important to use motivational interview techniques in self-management training given by nurses.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Motivational Interviewing-Based Education on Treatment Adherence and Self-Care Agency in COPD Patients
NCT06733662
Nurse-led COPD Self-management Intervention
NCT04459546
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Health Coaching
NCT05711654
The Effect of Training Given to Patients With COPD in Line With Pender's Health Promotion Model
NCT06551103
Patient Empowerment Training for COPD Patients
NCT06201104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Self-efficacy levels and dyspnea perception levels of COPD patients are the dependent variables of the study.
* Self-management training and motivational interviewing given to COPD patients are the independent variables of the research.
* Control variables of the study; age, gender, marital status, education status, occupation, employment status, smoking status, duration of being a COPD patient, number of hospitalizations, drug use status, people living with at home, type of warming, participation in COPD education and Pulmonary Rehabilitation program.
* H0: Self-management training and motivational interviewing given to COPD patients have no effect on self-efficacy and dyspnea perception.
* H1: Self-management training and motivational interviewing given to COPD patients have an effect on self-efficacy and dyspnea perception.
* All statistical analyzes were made SPSS 25 package program. The obtained data were analyzed by means of percentage distributions, mean, variance analysis in repeated measures, bonferroni analysis as a further analysis and t test in dependent groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
To the experimental group; motivational interview based self-management education was given for 30-45 minutes with groups of 5-8 people, COPD education guide was given, questions were shared with the question-answer method and group interaction was provided. After the self-management education, 3 motivational interviews were conducted 3 days apart with 30-45 minutes.The data were collected in three stages as pre-test, post-test and follow-up (after 30 day).
Motivational İnterviewing
The most current version of Motivational İnterviewing (MI) is described in detail in Miller and Rollnick (2013) Motivational Interviewing: Helping people to change (3rd edition). Key qualities include:
MI is a guiding style of communication, that sits between following (good listening) and directing (giving information and advice).
MI is designed to empower people to change by drawing out their own meaning, importance and capacity for change.
MI is based on a respectful and curious way of being with people that facilitates the natural process of change and honors client autonomy.
Control group
Normal care was continued in the control group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motivational İnterviewing
The most current version of Motivational İnterviewing (MI) is described in detail in Miller and Rollnick (2013) Motivational Interviewing: Helping people to change (3rd edition). Key qualities include:
MI is a guiding style of communication, that sits between following (good listening) and directing (giving information and advice).
MI is designed to empower people to change by drawing out their own meaning, importance and capacity for change.
MI is based on a respectful and curious way of being with people that facilitates the natural process of change and honors client autonomy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To be literate,
* To have the cognitive and mental competence to answer questions,
* Disease symptoms are at a level that does not prevent communication
Exclusion Criteria
* Having dyspnea at a level that prevents cooperation,
* Presence of sensory loss related to vision, hearing and speech,
* Presence of cognitive and mental impairment that prevents communication
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
OTHER
Akdeniz University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yeliz Karaçar
Research Assistant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yeliz Karaçar, M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Denizli Buldan Chest Diseases Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Denizli Buldan Chest Diseases Hospital
Denizli, Buldan, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2018. Available from: http://goldcopd.org.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motvational Interviewing. Motivasyonel Görüşme İnsanları Değişime Hazırlama. Karadağ F, Ögel K, Tezcan AE. (Ed), HYB Basım Yayın Matbaası, Ankara, 2009, 216-231.
Benzo R, Vickers K, Ernst D, Tucker S, McEvoy C, Lorig K. Development and feasibility of a self-management intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease delivered with motivational interviewing strategies. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2013 Mar-Apr;33(2):113-23. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318284ec67.
Abedi HA, Salimi S, Feizi A, et al. Assessment of relationship between self-efficacy and self-care in COPD Patients. Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, 2012, 10(1), 68-74.
Celli BR, Decramer M, Wedzicha JA, Wilson KC, Agusti A, Criner GJ, MacNee W, Make BJ, Rennard SI, Stockley RA, Vogelmeier C, Anzueto A, Au DH, Barnes PJ, Burgel PR, Calverley PM, Casanova C, Clini EM, Cooper CB, Coxson HO, Dusser DJ, Fabbri LM, Fahy B, Ferguson GT, Fisher A, Fletcher MJ, Hayot M, Hurst JR, Jones PW, Mahler DA, Maltais F, Mannino DM, Martinez FJ, Miravitlles M, Meek PM, Papi A, Rabe KF, Roche N, Sciurba FC, Sethi S, Siafakas N, Sin DD, Soriano JB, Stoller JK, Tashkin DP, Troosters T, Verleden GM, Verschakelen J, Vestbo J, Walsh JW, Washko GR, Wise RA, Wouters EF, ZuWallack RL; ATS/ERS Task Force for COPD Research. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Research questions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 1;191(7):e4-e27. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201501-0044ST.
Chen SM, Creedy D, Lin HS, Wollin J. Effects of motivational interviewing intervention on self-management, psychological and glycemic outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jun;49(6):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.011. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
Emme C, Mortensen EL, Rydahl-Hansen S, Ostergaard B, Phanareth K. Danish version of 'The COPD self-efficacy scale': translation and psychometric properties. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Sep;26(3):615-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00963.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
World Health Organization. (2018). The top 10 causes of death. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (26 Mayıs 2018).
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HF-18005
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
53043469
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.