High-Risk Veteran Initiative

NCT ID: NCT05050643

Last Updated: 2025-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-23

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Veterans at high-risk for hospitalization, including those with complex care needs, represent a large population of VHA patients who often do not receive evidence-based primary care practices that would help them avoid the hospital and improve their health. The high-RIsk VETerans (RIVET) Program will implement evidence-based practices that can support VHA Primary Care teams to deliver more comprehensive and patient-centered care, better strategies to manage medications, and avoid unnecessary hospitalizations. The RIVET Program is designed to find the most effective approaches to increasing use of evidence-based practices for high-risk Veterans in primary care, provide rapid data feedback to VHA on high-risk patient care, build capacity for the implementation of evidence-based practices, and train future leaders in high-risk Veteran care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The top 5% of Veterans at the highest risk for hospitalizations account for almost 50% of VHA healthcare costs, have significant multimorbidity, and are also at high risk for poor health outcomes. In the VHA, most (88%) high-risk patients are managed by general primary care teams (i.e., Patient-Aligned Care Teams; PACTs). Few PACTs, however, have implemented evidence-based practices (EBPs) known to address the most common issues among high-risk Veterans. Some evidence indicates that usual implementation strategies, such as dissemination of toolkits and training are not effective for improving uptake of EBPs. The most effective implementation strategies to achieve evidence-based care for high-risk patients, however, are unknown.

The overall impact goal of the high-RIsk VETerans (RIVET) QUERI Program is to improve VHA primary care capacity to provide comprehensive, evidence-based care for complex, high-risk Veterans. The investigators will test 2 implementation strategies to evaluate their impact on the uptake of two separate EBPs. These EPBs are 1) Comprehensive Assessment and Care Planning (CACP), and 2) Phone-Based Health Coaching for Medication Adherence (HCMA). CACP is based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and guides teams in systematically addressing patients' cognitive, functional, and social needs through a comprehensive care plan. HCMA addresses common challenges to medication adherence using a patient-centered approach through virtual encounters. Both comprehensive assessments and health coaching have demonstrated efficacy in randomized, controlled trials and have been implemented by two of the national partners in geriatrics and Whole Health teams. However, both EBPs have had low uptake in primary care. Implementing these practices in primary care has the potential to improve quality of care for the large majority of high-risk Veterans. The investigators will conduct a mixed methods type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to test the effectiveness of EBQI-IC and EBQI-LC versus usual care (national tool dissemination and training efforts) in at least 16 sites in multiple VISNs using a Concurrent Stepped Wedge design (Aim 2). The primary outcome is proportion of eligible high-risk patients that receive each EBP. The investigators will use the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) framework to compare and evaluate Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and costs. The investigators will then assess the Maintenance/sustainment and spread of both EBPs in primary care across all sites after the active 18-month implementation period (Aim 3).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multimorbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The investigators will conduct a mixed-methods type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness evaluation using a Concurrent Stepped Wedge design to compare two implementation strategies to increase adoption of the EBPs in primary care in 16 sites: Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI)-Individual Consultation (EBQI-IC) and EBQI-Learning Collaborative (EBQI-LC). Each VISN will implement a single EBP \[Comprehensive Assessment and Care Planning (CACP) for High-Risk Veterans or Phone-Based Health Coaching for Medication Adherence (HCMA)\]. Implementation strategies will be randomized by site. Time periods without active implementation will serve as the usual care periods for both EBQI conditions.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CACP-EBQI-IC

Individual (ongoing) consultation (IC), often described as coaching or supervision, is endorsed by implementation experts as an effective implementation strategy for EBP #1, Comprehensive Assessment and Care Planning (CACP) for High-Risk Veterans.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EBQI-IC

Intervention Type OTHER

Individual (ongoing) consultation (IC), often described as coaching or supervision, is endorsed by implementation experts as an effective implementation strategy

CACP-EBQI-LC

Learning collaboratives (LC) are widely used in healthcare settings, as an effective implementation strategy. The LC will be used to increase uptake of EBP #1, Comprehensive Assessment and Care Planning (CACP) for High-Risk Veterans.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EBQI-LC

Intervention Type OTHER

A Learning Collaborative is a systematic approach to process improvement based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series Collaborative model. During the Collaborative, organizations will test and implement system changes and measure their impact. They will share their experiences to accelerate learning and broader implementation of best practices.

HCMA-EBQI-IC

Individual (ongoing) consultation (IC), often described as coaching or supervision, is endorsed by implementation experts as an effective implementation strategy for EBP # 2,Phone-Based Health Coaching for Medication Adherence (HCMA).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EBQI-IC

Intervention Type OTHER

Individual (ongoing) consultation (IC), often described as coaching or supervision, is endorsed by implementation experts as an effective implementation strategy

HCMA-EBQI-LC

Learning collaboratives (LC) are widely used in healthcare settings, as an effective implementation strategy. The LC will be used to increase uptake of EBP # 2,Phone-Based Health Coaching for Medication Adherence (HCMA).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EBQI-LC

Intervention Type OTHER

A Learning Collaborative is a systematic approach to process improvement based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series Collaborative model. During the Collaborative, organizations will test and implement system changes and measure their impact. They will share their experiences to accelerate learning and broader implementation of best practices.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EBQI-IC

Individual (ongoing) consultation (IC), often described as coaching or supervision, is endorsed by implementation experts as an effective implementation strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

EBQI-LC

A Learning Collaborative is a systematic approach to process improvement based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Breakthrough Series Collaborative model. During the Collaborative, organizations will test and implement system changes and measure their impact. They will share their experiences to accelerate learning and broader implementation of best practices.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Individual Consultation Learning Collaborative

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Any VA site nationwide

Exclusion Criteria

Not a VA site nationwide
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Veterans Health Administration Office of Primary Care

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Veterans Health Administration Office of Patient Centered Care & Cultural Transformation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

US Department of Veterans Affairs

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Veterans Integrated Service Network 10

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Veterans Integrated Service Network 12

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA MidSouth Healthcare Network

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Evelyn T Chang, MD MSHS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Susan E Stockdale, PhD MA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Sepulveda, California, United States

Site Status

VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jimenez EE, Rosland AM, Stockdale SE, Reddy A, Wong MS, Torrence N, Huynh A, Chang ET. Implementing evidence-based practices to improve primary care for high-risk patients: study protocol for the VA high-RIsk VETerans (RIVET) type III effectiveness-implementation trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jul 15;5(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00613-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39010160 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QUX 21-005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.