Refining the Shared Decision Making Process Survey in ADHD Medication Decisions

NCT ID: NCT05048186

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

512 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-24

Study Completion Date

2021-04-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a retrospective observational survey study. We will survey a sample of adult parents or legal guardians who have a child who has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and who discussed ADHD treatment options for their child with a health care provider within the last 2 years. The main goal is to gather evidence of the validity and reliability of the Shared Decision Making Process scale. Secondary goal is to gather evidence on the quality of decisions parents make about their children with ADHD. A third goal is to assess the impact of a Decision Aid on participant knowledge of ADHD treatment options. Participants will be randomized to one of two arms: participants in the intervention arm will review a Decision Aid (patient educational tool) partway through the survey and those in the control arm will not receive any educational materials. All participants will complete survey that includes the Shared Decision Making process survey along with a few other measures. A subset of respondents will also complete a retest survey about two weeks after the initial survey.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a retrospective observational survey study. We will survey a sample of adult parents or legal guardians who have a child who has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and who discussed ADHD treatment options for their child with a health care provider within the last 2 years. The main goal is to gather evidence of the validity and reliability of the Shared Decision Making Process scale. Secondary goal is to gather evidence on the quality of decisions parents make about their children with ADHD. A third goal is to assess the impact of a Decision Aid on participant knowledge of ADHD treatment options. Participants will be randomized to one of two arms: participants in the intervention arm will review a Decision Aid (patient educational tool) partway through the survey and those in the control arm will not receive any educational materials. All participants will complete survey that includes the Shared Decision Making process survey along with a few other measures. A subset of respondents will also complete a retest survey about two weeks after the initial survey.

Study staff are working with a national sampling firm to recruit subjects and obtain 500 responses. The sample size was determined to ensure 80% power to detect difference of 0.25SD at 0.05 significant between intervention and control arm on participant knowledge scores. The decision aid intervention consists of a set of pre-visit summary cards for parents that cover the different treatment options and was developed by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

For the analyses, study staff will examine the descriptives of the Shared Decision Making Process items and knowledge scores for the two arms. Study staff will examine rates of missing data to determine acceptability, and will examine descriptive results to see whether the scores span the range of total possible scores, are normally distributed, and whether there is evidence of floor or ceiling effects. Study staff will also test several hypotheses to examine validity of the scores such as whether higher shared decision making process scores are associated with less decisional conflict and less regret. Staff will also examine retest reliability of the Shared Decision Making Process scale.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ADHD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Decision Aid Arm

Participants in this arm will review educational material from the ADHD Decision Aid developed by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment Decision Aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The parent pre-visit cards from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital's Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Treatment for School Age Children Decision Aid were used in this study. The 6 pre-visit cards provide an overview of ADHD treatment options, the respective benefits and downsides of each option, and questions to elicit goals/preferences. The four different treatment options presented were: (1) watchful waiting, (2) behavioral treatment, (3) medication treatment, and (4) combined treatment (behavioral and medication together).

Control Arm

Participants in this group will not receive any educational materials.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment Decision Aid

The parent pre-visit cards from the Cincinnati Children's Hospital's Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Treatment for School Age Children Decision Aid were used in this study. The 6 pre-visit cards provide an overview of ADHD treatment options, the respective benefits and downsides of each option, and questions to elicit goals/preferences. The four different treatment options presented were: (1) watchful waiting, (2) behavioral treatment, (3) medication treatment, and (4) combined treatment (behavioral and medication together).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult parent or legal guardian of a child between the ages of 5 and 13 who has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
* Read English
* Have talked with a health care provider about medication for treatment of ADHD for the child in the past 2 years

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Massachusetts, Boston

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karen Sepucha

Director of the Health Decision Sciences Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karen Sepucha, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019P001434-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.