Abbreviated Biparametric MRI (RSI + T2WI) for Prostate Cancer Detection: Correlation With Histopathology

NCT ID: NCT05046782

Last Updated: 2025-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-28

Study Completion Date

2027-02-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Multiparametric MRI of the prostate (mpMRI) plays an integral role in contemporary prostate cancer management. It involves the acquisition of both anatomical sequences (T1- and T2-weighted images) as well as 'functional' imaging sequences (diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging), the latter sequences being those which image water diffusivity and tissue perfusion, respectively. Advantages of mpMRI include ability to risk stratify patients prior to biopsy, enhanced detection of clinically significant cancer and reduced diagnosis of insignificant cancers, the identification of active surveillance candidates and improved local staging for subsequent surgical and radiotherapy planning. However, there are ongoing challenges encountered with prostate mpMRI in terms of patient acceptance, image acquisition technical challenges, interpretive expertise and cost.

These challenges have motivated recent investigations employing tailored MRI protocols, i.e. faster and less expensive MR exams that eliminate one or more aspects of current mpMRI technique considered redundant, while retaining the essential imaging parameters needed for equivalent diagnostic interpretation. Among these is non-contrast biparametric MRI, which involves anatomic T2 weighted images along with diffusion weighted images (DWI) as the only retained functional sequence. Both single center studies and meta analyses have demonstrated no added value for DCE compared to the combination of T2WI and DWI, Overall cancer detection rates have been found to be equivalent for bpMRI compared to mpMRI, independent of reader experience, with comparable efficacy to guide cognitive targeted, MRI-targeted and MRI-US fusion guided biopsy. Equivalence between bpMRI and mpMRI for cancer detection has also been corroborated in two recently published meta analyses. Based upon our institution's experience with prostate mpMRI, avoidance of gadolinium and DCE imaging would be associated with a 30 percent reduction in scan cost and 40 percent reduction in total time (i.e. scan time plus patient preparatory time).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Objective

This is a prospective study of men presenting to MD Anderson with treatment naïve, histologically confirmed prostate cancer.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of T2 weighted imaging (T2WI) and restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) (T2WI + RSI) to that of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), for the detection of individual prostate cancer foci. Results will be validated against histopathologic findings at prostatectomy as the reference standard.

We hypothesize that T2WI + RSI will detect more clinically significant prostate cancer foci (any Gleason grade group \> 2) compared to mpMRI when one-to-one matching between imaging and prostatectomy findings is performed.

Secondary Objectives

-To perform a pilot study evaluating T2WI+RSI/US fusion guided biopsy compared to mpMRI/US fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer (any Gleason grade group \> 2) in a cohort of patients scheduled for clinically indicated MRI/US fusion guided biopsy. In this pilot study, we hypothesize that RSI/US fusion guided biopsy will be non-inferior to mpMRI/US fusion guided biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Primary Objectives:

* To acquire high frequency transrectal microultrasound data in patients undergoing clinically indicated MRI/US fusion guided biopsy.
* To perform additional comparative analyses of mpMRI and RSI images, including analyzing variations in tumor contours between imaging data sets.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MRI technique

restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) can detect prostate cancer better than a standard-of-care MRI.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

restriction spectrum imaging (RSI)

Intervention Type DEVICE

detect prostate cancer better than a standard-of-care MRI

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

restriction spectrum imaging (RSI)

detect prostate cancer better than a standard-of-care MRI

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Primary Objective Cohort

* Treatment naïve patients with histologically confirmed clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as Gleason score \> 3+4 and a maximum cancer core length of \> 4mm (42)) with a clinical indication for prostate mpMRI for pre-treatment tumor detection and staging
* Patients with anticipated clinical follow-up who are anticipated to undergo surgery at MD Anderson.

Secondary Objective Cohort

* Treatment naïve patients with histologically confirmed intermediate risk prostate cancer (defined as Gleason score \> 3+4 and a maximum cancer core length of \> 4mm (42)) with a clinical indication for prostate mpMRI, who are to undergo target selection for fusion guided biopsy.
* Patients who are anticipated to undergo fusion guided biopsy at MD Anderson.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have already received androgen deprivation therapy or undergone prior surgery, radiotherapy or focal ablative therapies to the prostate
* Patients whose weight exceeds 400 pounds
* Patients allergic to gadolinium
* Patients with pacemakers or other implantable devices or conditions that are a contraindication to MRI
* Patients with conditions precluding MR imaging at 3T
* Patients less than 18 years of age
* Patients unable to provide informed consent
* Patients unable to tolerate an endorectal coil
* Patients who have undergone prostate biopsy less than 6 weeks prior to their MRI
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aradhana Venkatesan

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mdanderson.org

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2021-09145

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2020-0823

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.