Effectiveness of Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT)

NCT ID: NCT05044715

Last Updated: 2023-06-09

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: TERMINATED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 14 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2022-08-29
• Study Completion Date: 2023-05-31

Brief Summary

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that takes place at Brigham Young University's (BYU) Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS). The proposed study follows from the CAPS open trial which led to revisions of the compassion-focused therapy (CFT) protocol authored by Paul Gilbert. In essence, the study is taking existing evidence-based group treatments offered at CAPS, and comparing patient outcomes in a systematic manner. The investigators intend to replicate the improvement rates observed in the open trial with the revised CFT protocol and ascertain if outcomes are comparable to members who receive treatment-as-usual-TAU CAPS groups and those receiving CFT.

Hypotheses:

1. Group members attending a 12-session CFT group will have higher levels of compassion and self-reassurance as well as lower levels of self-criticism (and self-hate), fears of compassion, shame, and psychiatric distress when compared to members attending the parallel TAU groups.

2. Amount of change in compassion, self-reassurance, self-criticism (and self-hate), fears of compassion, and shame will be comparable for CFT measures authored by Dr. Gilbert as measures developed by independent compassion researchers.

3. There will be comparable levels of change in general psychiatric distress, as measured by the Outcome Questionnaire -45 (OQ-45), in members attending CFT and TAU groups. However, there will be greater change in members attending CFT groups on measures of compassion.

4. CFT will lead to lower levels of internalized shame through the mechanisms of fear reduction and increases in the 3 flows of compassion.

Detailed Description

Compassion-based interventions (CBIs) have become popular in the last ~30 years, either as standalone interventions or adjuncts to other treatments. Compassion focused therapy (CFT) is a CBI that was originally designed to be an adjunct to other interventions (e.g., individual psychotherapy). The focus on increasing compassion (especially self-compassion) grew out of the recognition that self-compassion has a strong positive relationship with well-being and a mirroring negative relationship with psychopathology (i.e., depression and anxiety). Indeed, six identified CBIs have been subjected to rigorous testing in RCTs, finding a medium effect on average (d = 0.55) across outcomes (e.g., depression, distress, well-being). CFT is "the most evaluated, and is the most appropriate for use in clinical populations" of all CBIs. CFT's evidence basis is expansive, prompting researchers to compose a review of its benefits for different populations and presenting problems (e.g., psychotic-spectrum disorders, people wanting to quit smoking). Researchers called for large-scale and high-quality trials having larger samples to further evaluate CFT. In particular, they call for this research to clarify equivocal results on important outcomes (i.e., some nonsignificant reductions of self-criticism). They also called for the inclusion of comparison groups stating that the next step was demonstrate that it produces comparable effects to other evidence-based interventions. A limitation noted by researchers was the existing CFT research includes a range of session length (i.e., as low as one and up to 16 weeks) and strategies (e.g., using cognitive restructuring, letter-writing, client-chosen practice with audio recordings) which varied widely between research groups. Furthermore, a portion of the evidence basis for CFT involves its combination with other third-wave psychotherapeutic interventions (i.e., acceptance and commitment therapy). Taken together, CFT has been adapted in multiple ways and its quality of evidence needs to be expanded, strengthening measurement and research designs as well as employing a standardized protocol that can be replicated with fidelity at multiple settings. The above limitations in existing CFT research prompted an open trial testing the effectiveness and feasibility of a standardized CFT protocol created by Paul Gilbert for group therapy at BYU's CAPS. The intent was to refine the CFT protocol so that it could be used in randomized trials, such as the one proposed in the present study. The production and empirical refinement of the CFT protocol by the BYU CAPS open trial directly addresses a serious problem in existing CFT trials that use incomparable treatment protocols. The investigators' CFT protocol was designed to be delivered in a group format. The investigators' BYU lab (http://cgrp.byu.edu) has a long tradition of making an empirical case for equivalence of group and individual treatments when delivered with fidelity. Indeed, three recent papers by the investigators provide compelling evidence for format equivalence using findings from both highly controlled randomized clinical trials and daily practice. Prior to the open trial, CFT had been delivered using a group treatment format, but its use with clinical populations is embryonic. Thus, the investigators' goal is to integrate CFT treatment as a group intervention targeting college counseling center clients to provide a rigorous empirical test of CFT theory. The investigators intend to do this by comparing CFT to treatment-as-usual groups for various presenting problems (e.g., depression and anxiety, eating disorders and sexual concerns) over the course of group treatment. Doing so will answer the call for higher-quality evidence and evaluate if (a) the theory-specified path of self-criticism to shame is present in treatment groups, and (b) this path can be mediated by CFT using the model.

Aims:

1. To assess the effects of CFT with a college counseling center population by measuring self-criticism (including self-reassurance and self-hate), compassion (i.e., for self, others, and from others), fears of compassion, shame, guilt and psychiatric distress to replicate the open trial outcomes.

2. To assess differences in effectiveness due to measurement source. In the open trial, investigators used measures created by Paul Gilbert (a founder of CFT) and those developed by independent researchers. This study replicates the process used in the open trial and the investigators do so again to ascertain if there is a measurement bias.

3. To assess the differential effectiveness of CFT groups compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU) groups run in Brigham Young University's (BYU) Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS). CFT group protocols have been developed for clients presenting with: (a) general distress-mood disorders, (2) anxiety disorders, (3) eating disorders, and (4) challenges reconciling intersecting identities of faith and/or sexuality. CAPS currently offers evidence-based groups for each of these populations (e.g., general process, anxiety, eating, and intersecting identities, respectively). The investigators will compare members in groups that are randomly assigned to parallel CFT or TAU groups on compassion and general distress measures.

4. To assess the effect of mediation between reducing the fears of compassion, increases in compassion and the final outcome of reducing self-criticism and shame. This effect has been reported in the CFT literature; however, the previous analyses did not adequately report parameters (e.g., the unmediated effect) making interpretation incomplete.

Conditions

Compassion; Self-Criticism; Shame; Guilt

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Treatment as Usual

Participants in this arm will receive treatment as usual (TAU) as an intervention.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment as Usual

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Treatment as usual-TAU groups include:

1. Mood Groups - General Process Groups

2. Anxiety Groups - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

3. Body Image and Eating Concerns Groups

4. Reconciling Faith and Sexuality Groups

Compassion-Focused Therapy

Participants in this arm will be enrolled in a CFT group intervention.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT)

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

The CFT protocol assumes that participants have no prior experience with meditation, mindfulness, and self-compassion and teaches principles of each as well as skills such as guided meditations.

Interventions

Treatment as Usual

Treatment as usual-TAU groups include:

1. Mood Groups - General Process Groups

2. Anxiety Groups - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

3. Body Image and Eating Concerns Groups

4. Reconciling Faith and Sexuality Groups

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT)

The CFT protocol assumes that participants have no prior experience with meditation, mindfulness, and self-compassion and teaches principles of each as well as skills such as guided meditations.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Struggles with issues of shame or self-criticism
• Have an Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45) total score at or above 64 (i.e., denoting psychiatric distress in the clinical range)
• Are willing to commit to at least 4 sessions of group treatment
• Are willing to complete the OQ-45 and GQ (standardized CAPS measures) on a weekly basis
• Are willing to have group be their primary mode of treatment to ensure group will be the primary vehicle for change
• Are willing to complete the study measures

Exclusion Criteria

• Clients who do not meet criteria or decline to participate

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Brigham Young University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Gary Burlingame

Professor/Department Chair, Clinical Psychology

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Gary M Burlingame, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham Young University

Locations

Brigham Young University

Provo, Utah, United States

Countries

United States

References

Teasdale JD, Segal ZV, Williams JM, Ridgeway VA, Soulsby JM, Lau MA. Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):615-23. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.68.4.615.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10965637 (View on PubMed)

Baumeister D, Sedgwick O, Howes O, Peters E. Auditory verbal hallucinations and continuum models of psychosis: A systematic review of the healthy voice-hearer literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:125-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27866082 (View on PubMed)

Beavan V. Towards a definition of "hearing voices": A phenomenological approach. Psychosis. 2011; 3(1): 63-73. doi:10.1080/17522431003615622

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Braehler C, Gumley A, Harper J, Wallace S, Norrie J, Gilbert P. Exploring change processes in compassion focused therapy in psychosis: results of a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):199-214. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12009. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24215148 (View on PubMed)

Burlingame GM, Gleave R, Erekson D, Nelson PL, Olsen J, Thayer S, Beecher M. Differential effectiveness of group, individual, and conjoint treatments: An archival analysis of OQ-45 change trajectories. Psychother Res. 2016 Sep;26(5):556-72. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1044583. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26170048 (View on PubMed)

Burlingame GM, Seebeck JD, Janis RA, Whitcomb KE, Barkowski S, Rosendahl J, Strauss B. Outcome differences between individual and group formats when identical and nonidentical treatments, patients, and doses are compared: A 25-year meta-analytic perspective. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2016 Dec;53(4):446-461. doi: 10.1037/pst0000090.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27918191 (View on PubMed)

Chandwick P, Lees S, Birchwood M. The revised Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R). Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;177:229-32. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.3.229.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11040883 (View on PubMed)

Chapman CL, Burlingame GM, Gleave R, Rees F, Beecher M, Porter GS. Clinical prediction in group psychotherapy. Psychother Res. 2012;22(6):673-81. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.702512. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22775060 (View on PubMed)

Corstens D, Longden E, McCarthy-Jones S, Waddingham R, Thomas N. Emerging perspectives from the hearing voices movement: implications for research and practice. Schizophr Bull. 2014 Jul;40 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S285-94. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu007.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24936088 (View on PubMed)

Weng HY, Fox AS, Shackman AJ, Stodola DE, Caldwell JZ, Olson MC, Rogers GM, Davidson RJ. Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1171-80. doi: 10.1177/0956797612469537. Epub 2013 May 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23696200 (View on PubMed)

Dillon J. The tale of an ordinary little girl. Psychosis. 2010; 2(1): 79-83. doi:10.1080/17522430903384305

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Hammersley P, Read J, Woodall S, Dillon J. Childhood Trauma and Psychosis: The Genie Is Out of the Bottle. Journal of Psychological Trauma. 2008; 6(2-3): 7-20. doi:10.1300/j513v06n02_02

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Gilbert P, Procter S. Compassionate mind training for people with high shame and self-criticism: Overview and pilot study of a group therapy approach. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2006; 13(6): 353.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Gilbert P, Clarke M, Hempel S, Miles JN, Irons C. Criticizing and reassuring oneself: An exploration of forms, styles and reasons in female students. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Mar;43(Pt 1):31-50. doi: 10.1348/014466504772812959.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15005905 (View on PubMed)

Goss K, Allan S. The development and application of compassion-focused therapy for eating disorders (CFT-E). Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Mar;53(1):62-77. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12039.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24588762 (View on PubMed)

Hofmann SG, Grossman P, Hinton DE. Loving-kindness and compassion meditation: potential for psychological interventions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;31(7):1126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21840289 (View on PubMed)

Horwood V, Allan S, Goss K, Gilbert P. The development of the Compassion Focused Therapy Therapist Competence Rating Scale. Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jun;93(2):387-407. doi: 10.1111/papt.12230. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31021509 (View on PubMed)

Kelly A, Zuroff D, Foa C, Gilbert P. Who benefits from training in self-compassionate self-regulation? A study of smoking reduction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2009; 29: 727-755.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Khoury B, Lecomte T, Gaudiano BA, Paquin K. Mindfulness interventions for psychosis: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2013 Oct;150(1):176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.055. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23954146 (View on PubMed)

Krogel J, Burlingame G, Chapman C, Renshaw T, Gleave R, Beecher M, Macnair-Semands R. The Group Questionnaire: a clinical and empirically derived measure of group relationship. Psychother Res. 2013;23(3):344-54. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.729868. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23432457 (View on PubMed)

Leary MR, Tate EB, Adams CE, Allen AB, Hancock J. Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: the implications of treating oneself kindly. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):887-904. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.887.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17484611 (View on PubMed)

MacBeth A, Gumley A. Exploring compassion: a meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Aug;32(6):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22796446 (View on PubMed)

Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity. 2003; 2: 223-250.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Neff KD. Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity. 2003; 2: 85-102.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Neff KD, Vonk R. Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: two different ways of relating to oneself. J Pers. 2009 Feb;77(1):23-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x. Epub 2008 Nov 28.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19076996 (View on PubMed)

Neff KD, Hsieh Y, Dejitterat K. Self-compassion, achievement goals and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity. 2005; 4: 263-287.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Read J, Agar K, Argyle N, Aderhold V. Sexual and physical abuse during childhood and adulthood as predictors of hallucinations, delusions and thought disorder. Psychol Psychother. 2003 Mar;76(Pt 1):1-22. doi: 10.1348/14760830260569210.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12689431 (View on PubMed)

Rockliff H, Gilbert P, McEwan K, Lightman S, Glover D. A pilot exploration of heart rate variability and salivary cortisol responses to compassion-focused imagery. Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 2008; 5, 132-139.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Sapey B, Bullimore P. Listening to voice hearers. Journal of Social Work. 2013; 13(6): 616-632. doi:10.1177/1468017312475278

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Thayer S, Burlingame, G. The validity of the Group Questionnaire: Construct clarity or construct drift? Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice. 2014; 18(4): 318-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000015

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Tirch DD. Mindfulness as a context for the cultivation of compassion. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2010; 3(2): 113-123.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Vaughan S, Fowler D. The distress experienced by voice hearers is associated with the perceived relationship between the voice hearer and the voice. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Jun;43(Pt 2):143-153. doi: 10.1348/014466504323088024.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15169615 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

IRB2020-220

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id