Efficacy of Maitland Mobilization in Shoulder Pathology
NCT ID: NCT05030402
Last Updated: 2022-11-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-03
2022-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Group Intervention for the Treatment of Shoulder Pathologies
NCT02541279
Inclusion of Mobilisation With Movement to an Exercise Programme in Rotator Cuff Related Pain
NCT04175184
Comparative Study Between Different Mobilization Techniques for Patients With Chronic Tennis Elbow
NCT06812377
Myofascial Release in Shoulder Pathologies
NCT04944446
Impact of Mulligan and Maitland Techniques on Rotator Cuff Lesions
NCT05924360
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Maitland group
31 patients receives tens, SW, Maitland, and exercises. An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Maitland
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Tens, exercise, SW
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Control group
32 receives tens, SW, conventional physiotherapy and exercises as treatment. An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Tens, exercise, SW
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Conventional physiotherapy
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Maitland
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Tens, exercise, SW
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Conventional physiotherapy
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have a restriction at least of two ranges of movement of the shoulder.
* Sign the consent before starting the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with neurological damage such as stroke or disease of Parkinson's, as well as those with rheumatism, osteoporosis, surgical fixation, or malignant tumors.
* Have a radiating pain in shoulder from a cervical injury.
* Pregnant patients.
* Patients who do not sign the consent before starting the study.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karishma Chuhermal Lalwani Mangtani
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karishma LALWANI MANGTAN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GRUPO ICOT PoliclĂnico Las Palmas.
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Haider R, Bashir MS, Adeel M, Ijaz MJ, Ayub A. Comparison of conservative exercise therapy with and without Maitland Thoracic Manipulative therapy in patients with subacromial pain: Clinical trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 Mar;68(3):381-387.
Hauswirth J, Ernst MJ, Preusser ML, Meichtry A, Kool J, Crawford RJ. Immediate effects of cervical unilateral anterior-posterior mobilisation on shoulder pain and impairment in post-operative arthroscopy patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(3):615-623. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160566.
Cook C, Learman K, Houghton S, Showalter C, O'Halloran B. The addition of cervical unilateral posterior-anterior mobilisation in the treatment of patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomised clinical trial. Man Ther. 2014 Feb;19(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
Carlson M, Hadlock T. Physical therapist management following rotator cuff repair for a patient with postpolio syndrome. Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;87(2):179-92. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050200. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
Noten S, Meeus M, Stassijns G, Van Glabbeek F, Verborgt O, Struyf F. Efficacy of Different Types of Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Primary Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 May;97(5):815-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ULPGC02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.