GDM Screening During COVID Pandemic. IADPSG vs WHO '99 Criteria

NCT ID: NCT05026840

Last Updated: 2022-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

All pregnant women who performed an OGTT following Italian Guidelines and then delivered at our University Hospital from march 2020 to march 2021 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Primary outcome of the study was the number of women to whom was diagnosed GDM with only the fasting glucose value (≥ 92 mg/dl), following Italian Diabetes Societies recommendations for COVID 19 pandemic period. In the same time, we prospectively collected the data of women who became diabetic following the criteria of WHO 1999 (fast glucose value ≥ 120 mg/dl, 2 hours later ≥ 140 mg/dl) still in use in some large countries like India. From the clinical charts, we reported the distribution of risk factors for GDM (maternal age ≥ 35 years, family history for diabetes type 2, ethnia, BMI ≥ 25, previous GDM) and clinical outcomes such as hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, macrosomia, intrauterine growth restriction and Caesarean section in emergency.

These data will be compared between the 2 groups consisting in those diagnosed with only IADPSG criteria versus those diagnosed with only WHO '99 criteria.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

GDM Screening During COVID Pandemic Comparison Between IADPSG vs WHO '99 Criteria

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IADPSG

GDM screening criteria

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

difference in risk factors and clinical outcomes between groups

WHO '99

GDM screening criteria

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

difference in risk factors and clinical outcomes between groups

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GDM screening criteria

difference in risk factors and clinical outcomes between groups

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Messina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rosario D'anna

full professor of obstetrics and gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital

Messina, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van-de-l'Isle Y, Steer PJ, Watt Coote I, Cauldwell M. Impact of changes to national UK Guidance on testing for gestational diabetes screening during a pandemic: a single-centre observational study. BJOG. 2021 Apr;128(5):917-920. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16482. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32888369 (View on PubMed)

D'Anna R, Di Benedetto A, Palella S, Miceli A, Romeo P, Corrado F. Screening of GDM during COVID pandemic in an Italian setting: comparison between IADPSG and WHO '99 criteria. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Oct 31;14(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00936-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36316733 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IADPSG vs WHO '99

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.