Examination of Operative Approach in pwFSHD (Patient With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy)

NCT ID: NCT05022355

Last Updated: 2022-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-27

Study Completion Date

2022-08-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common forms of muscular dystrophy, characterized by pronounced skeletal novelistic weakness and with a broad spectrum of diseases. It is a hereditary disease seen in 3-5/100,000 of society, usually starting with weakness in the facial and shoulder muscles and progressing to the trunk, pelvis and leg muscles, giving symptoms in the twenties. In FSHD, which shows slow progression and can lead to loss of ambulation ability in about 20% of patients, patients may have difficulty performing activities above shoulder level with the influence of the periscapular area.

Skeletal muscle weakness leads to posture and balance disorders, and postural instability is a common problem in patients with FSHD. Weakness of the trunk and lower limb muscles found in more than half of patients causes problems with postural balance and walking. The calf, iliopsoas, and gluteus maximus muscles together form the main determinants of walking speed in healthy people, where kalf muscles are known to contribute the most. Individuals with FSHD have been reported to have decreased speed, step length, and step frequency compared to healthy controls. Impaired upper body control can compromise the maintenance of dynamic stability. In patient with FSHD the effects of muscle tone, motor coordination, loss of joint range of motion and muscle weakness on posture, balance control and gait are observed more clearly.

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of scapular management treatments on balance and gait in FSHD patients.

H0: There is no difference in balance and walking parameters of patients with FSHD who have had scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery and have not undergone surgery.

H1: There is a difference in balance and walking parameters of patients with FSHD who have had scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery and have not undergone surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Voluntary patients who have been diagnosed with FSHD will be included in the study. Signed voluntary consent will be obtained from participants. Participants will be divided into two groups. One group will include patients who have undergone scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery, while the other group will include patients who have not undergone surgery. Both groups will undergo some outcome measures to assess their balance and walking.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

scapulothoracic arthrodesis

Individuals diagnosed with FSHD who have undergone unilateral or bilateral surgery who meet the inclusion criteria.

application of determined outcome scales on patients

No interventions assigned to this group

non-operative

Participants diagnosed with FSHD who have not undergone any surgery, who meet the inclusion criteria.

application of determined outcome scales on patients

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-65 years
* Score between 0,5 and 3,5 according to CSS (clinical severity rating)
* Score between 3 and 5 according to FAS (functional ambulation scale)
* Being included in the surgical group the patient has undergone unilateral or bilateral scapulothoracic arthrodesis surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of lower extremity orthopedic problems/problems that can cause balance and walking problems
* Presence of any other upper limb orthopedic problems/problems and surgery
* Having undergone Spinal fusion surgery
* Presence of additional neurological problems/problems
* Having a level of visual and auditory problems that will prevent communication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aysenur Erekdag

BSc

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ipek Yeldan, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fecek C, Emmady PD. Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy. 2023 Jun 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559028/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32644454 (View on PubMed)

Rijken NH, van Engelen BG, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Clinical Functional Capacity Testing in Patients With Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Construct Validity and Interrater Reliability of Antigravity Tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec;96(12):2201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.429. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26363336 (View on PubMed)

Tawil R, Van Der Maarel SM. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2006 Jul;34(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/mus.20522.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16508966 (View on PubMed)

Bayram S, Kendirci AS, Karalar S, Durmus Tekce H, Parman FY, Akgul T, Durmaz H. Correlations between radiographic spinopelvic parameters and health-related quality of life: A prospective evaluation of 37 patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106137. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106137. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32791439 (View on PubMed)

Padua L, Aprile I, Frusciante R, Iannaccone E, Rossi M, Renna R, Messina S, Frasca G, Ricci E. Quality of life and pain in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2009 Aug;40(2):200-5. doi: 10.1002/mus.21308.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19609906 (View on PubMed)

Kang PB, Morrison L, Iannaccone ST, Graham RJ, Bonnemann CG, Rutkowski A, Hornyak J, Wang CH, North K, Oskoui M, Getchius TS, Cox JA, Hagen EE, Gronseth G, Griggs RC; Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline summary: evaluation, diagnosis, and management of congenital muscular dystrophy: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Neurology. 2015 Mar 31;84(13):1369-78. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001416.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25825463 (View on PubMed)

Tawil R, Kissel JT, Heatwole C, Pandya S, Gronseth G, Benatar M; Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline summary: Evaluation, diagnosis, and management of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Neurology. 2015 Jul 28;85(4):357-64. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001783.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26215877 (View on PubMed)

Le Hanneur M, Saint-Cast Y. Long-term results of Letournel scapulothoracic fusion in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A retrospective study of eight cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 May;103(3):421-425. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28159680 (View on PubMed)

Kord D, Liu E, Horner NS, Athwal GS, Khan M, Alolabi B. Outcomes of scapulothoracic fusion in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A systematic review. Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Apr;12(2):75-90. doi: 10.1177/1758573219866195. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32313557 (View on PubMed)

Statland JM, Tawil R. Risk of functional impairment in Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2014 Apr;49(4):520-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.23949. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23873337 (View on PubMed)

Iosa M, Mazza C, Pecoraro F, Aprile I, Ricci E, Cappozzo A. Control of the upper body movements during level walking in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Gait Posture. 2010 Jan;31(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.247. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19782569 (View on PubMed)

Rijken NH, van der Kooi EL, Hendriks JC, van Asseldonk RJ, Padberg GW, Geurts AC, van Engelen BG. Skeletal muscle imaging in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, pattern and asymmetry of individual muscle involvement. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Dec;24(12):1087-96. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25176503 (View on PubMed)

Aprile I, Padua L, Iosa M, Gilardi A, Bordieri C, Frusciante R, Russo G, Erra C, De Santis F, Ricci E. Balance and walking in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: multiperspective assessment. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;48(3):393-402. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22713540 (View on PubMed)

Rijken NH, van Engelen BG, de Rooy JW, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts AC. Gait propulsion in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and ankle plantarflexor weakness. Gait Posture. 2015 Feb;41(2):476-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25687333 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

38981562-900-

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ultrasonograpy in Hemiplegic Patients
NCT06706063 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING