Ultrasonograpy in Hemiplegic Patients

NCT ID: NCT06706063

Last Updated: 2024-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-15

Study Completion Date

2025-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the architectural changes and muscle stiffness of the upper and lower extremity muscles in our hemiplegic patients ultrasonographically and to investigate their relationship with clinical assessment scales.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spasticity has been defined as "disorganized sensorimotor control resulting from upper motor neuron lesion, manifested as intermittent or continuous involuntary activation of muscles". Its high prevalence and limited effectiveness of current treatment options make spasticity an important health problem in neurological rehabilitation.

The commonly used tools for the assessment of spasticity are subjective clinical scales, including the Ashworth Scale (AS), Modified AS (MAS), Tardieu Scale (TS), Modified TS (MTS), and Tone Assessment Scale (TAS). Most of these scales have limitations regarding reliability and inter-examiner reproducibility. Many uncontrollable or unstable factors can affect the measurement results.

On the other hand, spasticity can be assessed objectively using isokinetic dynamometers or electromyography (EMG). However, EMG data can be affected by various factors (electrode placement, muscle atrophy, skin resistance, etc.). These quantitative and objective methods require technological skills and equipment and can only assess a limited number of muscles. Ultrasonography has been used to determine muscle size (muscle length and volume), architectural features (thickness, cross-sectional area, fascicle length, and pennation angle), as well as content features (e.g., stiffness) of spastic muscles in patients with central nervous system injuries. In clinical practice, muscle atrophy-loss of contractile tissue-is usually measured by cross-sectional area or thickness (reflecting cross-sectional area) in spastic patients. Ultrasound is also useful for measuring fascicle length and pennation angle, architectural features that determine the muscle movement and force generated along the line of tension, respectively. The fascicle length of the affected muscle on the hemiparetic side of stroke patients was found to be shorter than in nonparetic and healthy controls. In addition to architectural changes, excessive stiffness felt during movement of the segments around the joint causes movement impairment in patients with spasticity. Ultrasound elastography has recently enabled physicians to accurately measure passive muscle stiffness. It has been found that spastic muscle stiffness increases in patients with central nervous system injuries.

Muscles frequently evaluated by ultrasound elastography are biceps and gastrocnemius muscles, which are reported to be highly affected by spasticity. However, the lack of a standard measurement protocol and the variability of elasticity in patients need to be addressed. Since there are few studies investigating the application of ultrasound elastography techniques for measuring muscle stiffness, future studies are needed to understand the mechanical properties of the muscles and to obtain a standard and reliable protocol. In the literature, only one study has evaluated forearm muscles elastographically and found that the elasticity ratio was lower on the hemiplegic side compared to the non-hemiplegic side.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the architectural changes and muscle stiffness of the upper and lower extremity muscles in our hemiplegic patients ultrasonographically and to investigate their relationship with clinical assessment scales.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemiplegia Hemiparesis After Stroke Spasticity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasonography of muscles

The biceps brachii, flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus muscles and gastrocnemius muscles of the participants on the affected and unaffected sides will be evaluated ultrasonographically. Two researchers (with at least 5 years of experience in ultrasound imaging) blinded to the clinical evaluations of the patients and previous measurements will evaluate the same patients at two different times to test interobserver reproducibility. Muscle thickness, fascicle length and pennation angle will be recorded on B-mode imaging. In addition, elastographic evaluation will be performed on the same muscles and strain rate will be recorded.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 40-70
* Unilateral hemiplegia
* At least 3 months since cerebrovascular accident

Exclusion Criteria

* Operation or fracture in the last 3 months
* Botulinum toxin injection in the last 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sevda Adar

Ass. Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Health Application and Research Center Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic

Afyonkarahisar, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SAUSG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id