De-Implementation of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Use After Cardiac Device Procedures

NCT ID: NCT05020418

Last Updated: 2023-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project will use automated audit and feedback to improve compliance with antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines for CIED procedures that we anticipate will translate into better outcomes for our patients. A multi-faceted implementation bundle to promote de-implementation of guideline discordant care will be tested at three intervention sites. Materials and tools will then be disseminated throughout the VA healthcare system if the intervention is found to be effective.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim I tests the hypothesis that a multi-faceted implementation strategy that includes educational sessions with members of electrophysiology teams and locally-adapted monthly surveillance reports about guideline-concordant pre-procedural antimicrobial use and guideline-discordant post-procedural antimicrobial use, 90-day incidence of CIED infections, and 90-day incidence of C. difficile infections and 7-day incidence of AKI that will be delivered to local infectious diseases champions and shared with electrophysiology teams using blended facilitation will promote uptake of best practices and improve outcomes. This hypothesis incorporates learning/unlearning and fills a major gap caused by the dearth of rigorous de- implementation and de-adoption studies. Aim II tests the hypothesis that electronic health records (EHRs) and medical informatics have advanced to the point that it will be feasible, during the next four years, to establish an audit and feedback surveillance system that can be scaled and disseminated widely across the VA.

This study will use mixed qualitative and quantitative methods to address the study aims. This will include interviews with key stakeholders and quantitative measurement of quality metrics (e.g., pre-and post-procedure antimicrobial use) and outcomes (e.g., cardiac device infections, acute kidney injuries, C. difficile infections).

All patients receiving a cardiac device implantation within the VA healthcare system during the study period may be potentially included. Medical records previously reviewed and accessed may also be included for validation, testing, and optimization of electronic algorithms. In addition to the VA patients who will participate, key stakeholders for infection prevention in the cardiac device laboratory (e.g., providers, nurses, electrophysiology laboratory staff) will also participate in interviews. Active implementation will occur at 3 VA sites, a passive dissemination process will occur at all VA sites with a cardiac device laboratory (\~78 VA sites).

High quality studies establish that prolonged prophylaxis has no beneficial impact on CIED-related infection rates but worsens outcomes and leads to preventable deaths. Despite guidelines specifically recommending against prolonged prophylaxis, this practice is common in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories, including VA and non-VA hospitals. At the same time, antimicrobial resistance and overuse represent critical threats to the health of the population. This intersection- inappropriate prescribing and a critical need to improve use-- creates an urgent need for research into methods to promote adoption of best antimicrobial use and de-implementation of ineffective and harmful prescribing. IT-based solutions for improving antimicrobial use, including antimicrobial prophylaxis, is a quality-improvement strategy endorsed by The Joint Commission. This project will advance this concept and couple learning/unlearning processes to promote uptake of best practices. If effective, this model can be replicated in other settings of care to improve antimicrobial use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Antibiotics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Cardiac device procedures performed within the national VA healthcare system during the period from Fiscal Year (FY) 16-24 will be identified using a list of relevant Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Based on our preliminary results, we anticipate that the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) EP Procedures Cohort (electronic surveillance cohort) will include approximately 100,000 cardiac device cases. Because this cohort is based in CDW, once a Veteran undergoing a device procedure is identified using CPT codes, the orders, procedures, and consults that occurred during the 90-day window following the procedure can be extracted from the VA Electronic Health Record (EHR) In addition to the full cohort, the implementation bundle will be tested at the three high-volume intervention sites (\~1500 cases per year). Roll out of the interventions will occur in a stepped manner, such that pre- and post- intervention data will be collected at all sites.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cardiac Device Cohort

This study is open to any adult VA patient with data about a cardiac device procedure performed in the electrophysiology laboratory entered into the national VA EHR. During FY 20-FY 24, we anticipate that this will include approximately 9,000 patients per year, or a total of 50,000 patients. In addition, cases that were previously accessed and used to develop the infection monitoring system, and the quality metric monitoring system, may also be included. This includes all patients entered in the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking - Electrophysiology Cohort (CART-EP) database during the period from 2006-2016, and all VA patients who received a cardiac device procedure during the period from 2010-2019. This includes another approximately 50,000 patients, for a total of 100,000 patients.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chart Review

Intervention Type OTHER

Intervention sites will receive a multi-faceted implementation intervention, which will include external and internal blended facilitation, education materials for providers and patients, and audit and feedback about practices and outcomes with benchmarking to non-intervention sites.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chart Review

Intervention sites will receive a multi-faceted implementation intervention, which will include external and internal blended facilitation, education materials for providers and patients, and audit and feedback about practices and outcomes with benchmarking to non-intervention sites.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* This study is open to any adult VA patient with data about a cardiac device procedure performed in the electrophysiology laboratory entered into the national VA EHR.

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Boston Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Westyn Branch-Elliman

Assistant Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Westyn Branch-Elliman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Boston Healthcare System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Boston Healthcare System

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Branch-Elliman W, Lamkin R, Shin M, Mull HJ, Epshtein I, Golenbock S, Schweizer ML, Colborn K, Rove J, Strymish JM, Drekonja D, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Xu TH, Elwy AR. Promoting de-implementation of inappropriate antimicrobial use in cardiac device procedures by expanding audit and feedback: protocol for hybrid III type effectiveness/implementation quasi-experimental study. Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 29;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01186-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35093104 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 1585926

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anticoagulation Adherence Measurement Strategies
NCT07129395 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
OptiMEDs Pilot Study
NCT04142645 COMPLETED NA
Medicines Gaps Study
NCT05332158 UNKNOWN NA