Engaging Patients to Promote Deprescribing

NCT ID: NCT04294901

Last Updated: 2025-05-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5946 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-29

Study Completion Date

2023-10-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One mechanism to reduce potentially inappropriate medications is through deprescribing, a deimplementation-based approach to thoughtfully discontinue a medication a patient is currently prescribed. Many interventions to overcome deprescribing barriers target the provider, who is already overburdened. Although some believe providers have primary responsibility for deprescribing, patient-initiated discontinuation discussions can effectively facilitate deprescribing. In a single-site pilot study, the investigators successfully engaged VA Primary Care patients to facilitate deprescribing of select potentially inappropriate medications. The investigators now propose a multisite randomized controlled trial of engaging Veterans who may be deprescribing candidates. By study end, the investigators will have established the effectiveness of an innovative, low-tech, patient-focused intervention to promote deprescribing, thereby directly improving quality, safety, and value of VA care while also setting the stage for generalization of this approach to other potentially inappropriate medications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background - Despite multiple provider- and system-level interventions to reduce potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), many Veterans are still prescribed drugs that provide little benefit, placing them at unnecessary risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). One mechanism to reduce PIMs is through deprescribing, a de-implementation-based approach to thoughtfully discontinue a medication a patient is currently prescribed.

Many Choosing Wisely recommendations address PIMs. Specifically, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), a medicine used to reduce gastric acid, should be de-escalated to the lowest dose necessary to provide relief. Many older patients with diabetes are over-controlled, with blood sugar levels lower than recommended, yet remain on multiple diabetes medicines and may be able to use fewer medicines. These patients are also at higher risk of low blood sugar from insulin and sulfonylureas, and should have limited use of these agents.

Finally, gabapentin is often used off-label to treat pain, with greatly increased use over the past several years. There are many barriers to deprescribing PIMs. Many interventions solely target the prescribing provider. Although some believe providers have primary responsibility for deprescribing, patient initiation of discontinuation conversations can effectively facilitate deprescribing. In a single-site pilot study, the investigators successfully reduced PIMs by engaging VA Primary Care patients by providing them with Veteran-centric EMPOWER ("Eliminating Medications through Patient Ownership of End Results") brochures. However, it is not known if this approach will be as successful for Veterans with other chronic conditions or at non-pilot sites.

Aims - The investigators propose three aims. 1) Examine the impact of a patient-centered intervention to change provider prescribing (the primary outcome), as determined by the frequency with which medications are either deprescribed or de-escalated. 2) Examine the effect of a patient-centered intervention on engaging patients, via post-visit surveys of Veterans' interaction with the brochures and their influence on deprescribing discussions and deprescribing. 3) Using qualitative methods, identify key organizational contextual factors related to intervention fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness to support future implementation.

Methods and Innovation - The investigators propose a multisite quasi-experimental trial using a Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation design of providing EMPOWER brochures directly to Veterans who may be deprescribing candidates for three cohorts of PIMs (PPIs, diabetes medications, and gabapentin). The investigators will mail brochures in advance of scheduled primary care visits, unlike distribution methods used in other studies. The primary outcome will be the composite of deprescribing and de-escalation of target medications, identified in pharmacy dispensing records of the Corporate Data Warehouse (Aim 1). Mail-based surveys sent after the scheduled primary care visit will assess patient engagement with the brochure and its impact on patient-provider communication (Aim 2). Finally, qualitative data from clinicians and staff addressing Proctor's Implementation Outcomes will provide the foundation for future implementation strategies (Aim 3).

Significance and Next Steps - The study directly addresses multiple Veteran Care Priorities, including health care value, primary care practice, quality/safety, and Whole Health, and is aligned with current VA initiatives to prioritize patient preferences via individually-tailored, proactive care plans. The proposed work is strongly supported by Pharmacy Benefits Management and Office of Patient Centered Care and Cultural Transformation, which will facilitate the dissemination of findings to improve the quality and safety of medication use within VA. By study end, the investigators will have established the effectiveness of an innovative, low-tech, patient-focused intervention to promote deprescribing of commonly used medications for three populations, thereby directly improving quality, safety, and value of VA care while also setting the stage for wider implementation and generalization of this approach to other potentially inappropriate medications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Medical Overuse Inappropriate Prescribing Deprescriptions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The investigators will target Veterans at three primary care sites who meet eligibility criteria for one of the PIM cohorts and are prescribed the target medication at the time of their scheduled primary care visit. Each PCP was assigned to receive three medication groups (i.e., PPIs, diabetes medications, and gabapentin) in a randomized order, and during each period of time for each medication/medication group assignment, prescriptions for that specific medication/medication group were assessed. Patients that received the specific medication or medication group from the PCP during the time of assignment were enrolled in the study. The study will begin with a 13-month retrospective baseline period, with one month for baseline subject identification and 12 months for observation of baseline subjects' deprescribing outcomes. The primary comparisons are between "brochure-intervention" patients and "baseline" patients (matched in terms of eligibility) from the same provider.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Patients prescribed gabapentin with a total daily dose \>1800mg meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria who have a primary care appointment with a provider in the Gaba cohort; Patients prescribed either insulin or a sulfonylurea meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria who have a primary care appointment with a provider in the DM cohort; Patients prescribed a PPI meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria who have a primary care appointment with a provider in the PPI cohort

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Direct to patient medication brochure

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

An EMPOWER medication brochure, adapted to the VA, designed to educate and activate patients. These brochures provide detailed medication information, allow self-testing of indications for use, prompt reflection of experiences with potential side effects, discuss alternative therapies (medication and non-pharmacologic options), and provide a vignette of a patient who successfully stopped the medicine. They were designed for a 6th grade reading level and were based upon theories of patient activation, adult learning, and cognitive dissonance. The visually appealing brochure repeatedly emphasizes that patients should not make any medication changes without first consulting their health care providers.

Control

Historical control patients seen by intervention PCPs in the 18-12 months prior to the intervention window.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Direct to patient medication brochure

An EMPOWER medication brochure, adapted to the VA, designed to educate and activate patients. These brochures provide detailed medication information, allow self-testing of indications for use, prompt reflection of experiences with potential side effects, discuss alternative therapies (medication and non-pharmacologic options), and provide a vignette of a patient who successfully stopped the medicine. They were designed for a 6th grade reading level and were based upon theories of patient activation, adult learning, and cognitive dissonance. The visually appealing brochure repeatedly emphasizes that patients should not make any medication changes without first consulting their health care providers.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Veteran with a Primary Care appointment at one of three Veteran Affairs Medical Centers (including Community Based Outpatient Clinics)

* PPI Cohort:

* \>90 consecutive days of PPI at any dose
* Diabetes Cohorts:

* HbA1c \<7%
* At least one of Age \>65 years
* Renal impairment
* Cognitive impairment
* either \>90 consecutive days insulin or sulfonylurea or \>90 consecutive days of \>2 DM medications (neither of which is insulin or sulfonylurea)
* Gaba Cohort:

* \>90 consecutive days with total daily dose \>1800mg

Exclusion Criteria

* PPI Cohort Exclusions:

* Diagnosis warranting PPI treatment
* Medication warranting PPI treatment
* Gaba Cohort Exclusions:

* Neuropathic pain
* Seizure disorder
* and/or Cancer-related pain
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amy M Linsky, MD MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, MA

Leeds, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zimmerman KM, Linsky AM. A narrative review of updates in deprescribing research. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Sep;69(9):2619-2624. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17273. Epub 2021 May 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33991423 (View on PubMed)

Niznik JD, Zhao X, Slieanu F, Mor MK, Aspinall SL, Gellad WF, Ersek M, Hickson RP, Springer SP, Schleiden LJ, Hanlon JT, Thorpe JM, Thorpe CT. Effect of Deintensifying Diabetes Medications on Negative Events in Older Veteran Nursing Home Residents. Diabetes Care. 2022 Jul 7;45(7):1558-1567. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2116.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35621712 (View on PubMed)

Jones KF, Stolzmann K, Wormwood J, Pendergast J, Miller CJ, Still M, Bokhour BG, Hanlon J, Simon SR, Rosen AK, Linsky AM. Effectiveness of Patient-Directed Education to Sustain Deprescribing: A Pragmatic Trial. Drugs Aging. 2025 Oct 18. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01251-z. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41108442 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 18-228

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Medication Use and Quality of Life Among Older People
NCT05123313 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA