Fetal Cardiac Function Parameters and HbA1c As Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT05019508

Last Updated: 2025-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-13

Study Completion Date

2023-04-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective cohort study to assess the predictive value of fetal cardiac parameters, the change in fetal cardiac parameters (CFP), HbA1c, and/or the change in HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) for gestational diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the onset of carbohydrate intolerance that affects up to 6-9% of pregnancies. A diagnosis of GDM conveys numerous implications for the health of the mother and the fetus if not properly identified and/or treated. Maternal complications include increased risk of preeclampsia and development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus later in life. The risks to the fetus include increased risk of macrosomia, stillbirth, hypoglycemia, shoulder dystocia as well as increased risk of childhood obesity and diabetes.

Per ACOG guidelines, women who are at an increased risk for undiagnosed pre-gestational diabetes mellitus or developing GDM should receive early screening when they initially present for prenatal care, most commonly in the late first or early second trimester.5 The best test for this early assessment is not yet established. Practices patterns vary between use of the two-step oral glucose tolerance screening and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Use of the oral glucose tolerance tests for screening of GDM is well-established and the cut-offs determined for 24-28 week routine screening are used when the oral tolerance tests are administered in early pregnancy. An HbA1c level ≥6.5% is used to diagnose diabetes, however there is evidence that there is a higher rate of GDM diagnosis and poor outcomes with a HbA1c level as low as 5.6%. Women who are not diagnosed with GDM before 20 weeks, go on to routine screening at 24-28 weeks.

With the current protocols for early GDM screening, treatment of early glucose intolerance has not shown to improve neonatal outcomes, however. The methods and timing of current early GDM screening may not be identifying a population that is truly at risk of poor outcomes from glucose intolerance in the way routine screening with the two-step process does. More research into screening paradigms other than oral tolerance tests in early pregnancy is needed. A HbA1c level assesses the amount glycation of hemoglobin molecules in red blood cells, indirectly estimating the average blood glucose level over the past 8-12 weeks. HbA1c independently has not been shown to be adequately predictive of a GDM diagnosis in pregnancy. Many studies assessing the screening value of HbA1c obtain the value in the first trimester when a large portion of the 12 weeks prior is before significant placentation. A change in HbA1c in the first half of pregnancy, when combined with other clinical variables may be more predictive. Novel clinical variables should also be considered. There is evidence that even well-control pre-gestational and gestational diabetics show significant variation in fetal cardiac functional parameters such as interventricular septum thickness (IVS), the E/A ratio, and myocardial performance index (MPI). The predictive value of these changes for glucose intolerance has not yet been investigated.

This is be a prospective cohort study to assess the predictive value of fetal cardiac parameters, the change in fetal cardiac parameters (CFP), HbA1c, and/or the change in HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) for gestational diabetes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gestational Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)

High risk women screened with HbA1c at initiation of prenatal care who were not diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus or Early GDM.

These women will have Fetal Cardiac Function Parameters at their 20 week anatomy scan (E/A ratio, IVS, MPI). At their 24-28 week routine GDM screening, we will repeat the HbA1c and will repeat the E/A ratio, IVS, MPI. If women have a growth scan for any reason between 32 and 36 weeks, E/A ratio, IVS, and MPI will be repeated at those times.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women who have completed a HbA1c test during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy.
* Risk for GDM including any of the following:

* Obese
* History of GDM
* History of macrosomia
* Twin gestation
* PCOS
* Family history of diabetes

Exclusion Criteria

* • Pregnant women who have not completed a HbA1c test during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy.

* women with pre-gestational diabetes
* nonviable pregnancy
* fetal anomalies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christopher S. Ennen

Associate Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christoher Ennen, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UVA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

210175

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.