A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System (SUMMIT MAX)
NCT ID: NCT05018650
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-21
2024-05-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Redasemtide (S-005151) in Adult Participants With Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT05953480
Intravenous Thrombolysis With rhTNK-tPA for Acute Non-large Vessel Occlusion in Extended Time Window
NCT05752916
Solitaire™ With the Intention For Thrombectomy as PRIMary Endovascular Treatment (SWIFT PRIME) Trial
NCT01657461
A Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of TB006 in Participants With Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT05156827
Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Infusion for Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT06518902
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Route 92 Medical Monopoint Reperfusion System
Aspiration thrombectomy with the Route 92 Medical HiPoint 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters as part of the Monopoint Reperfusion System to treat acute ischemic stroke
Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions will be performed with direct aspiration consisting of navigating a large-bore catheter up to the face of the clot and initiating vacuum suction.
Aspiration Predicate
Aspiration thrombectomy with a predicate aspiration device to treat acute ischemic stroke
Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions will be performed with direct aspiration consisting of navigating a large-bore catheter up to the face of the clot and initiating vacuum suction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions will be performed with direct aspiration consisting of navigating a large-bore catheter up to the face of the clot and initiating vacuum suction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age \>=18 years
3. Patient presenting with clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
4. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score \>= 6
5. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Score (mRS) \<= 2
6. Baseline ASPECTS \>= 6
7. Endovascular treatment initiated (defined as time of groin puncture) within 8 hours from time last known well
8. If indicated, thrombolytic therapy shall be initiated per clinical guidelines. If eligible for thrombolytic therapy, subjects should be treated as soon as possible and lytic use should not be delayed regardless of potential eligibility for mechanical neurothrombectomy.
9. The patient is indicated for aspiration neurothrombectomy with the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System as determined by the Investigator
10. Angiographic confirmation of a large vessel occlusion of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery or distal internal carotid artery
Exclusion Criteria
2. In the Investigator's opinion, any known comorbidity (including COVID-19 positivity) that may complicate treatment or prevent improvement or follow-up
3. Known serious, advanced, or terminal illness with anticipated life expectancy \< 12 months
4. Known history of severe allergy to contrast medium
5. Known to have suffered a stroke in the past 90 days
6. Known connective tissue disorder affecting the arteries (e.g. Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
7. Any known previous cerebral hemorrhagic event
8. Any known pre-existing coagulation deficiency
9. Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR \>3.0
10. Known baseline platelet count \<50,000/µL
11. Known baseline blood glucose of \<50 mg/dL or \>400 mg/dL
12. Known to be participating in another study involving an investigational device or drug
13. Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
14. Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evidence of recent/ fresh cerebral hemorrhage (the presence of microbleeds is allowed)
15. Baseline CT or MRI showing intracranial tumor (except small meningioma \<= 2cm) or significant mass effect with midline shift due to the tumor
16. Presumed septic thrombus, or suspicion of bacterial endocarditis
17. Inability to access the cerebral vasculature in the opinion of the neurointerventional team
18. Unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (e.g. no fixed home address)
19. Evidence of arterial dissection in a vessel that must be traversed
20. Evidence of high-grade stenosis or occlusion (i.e., tandem occlusion) in a vessel that must be traversed
21. Known active or recent history of cocaine or methamphetamine abuse (within last 6 months)
22. Known history or presence of aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the territory of the target lesion
23. For all patients, severe sustained hypertension with SBP \>200 and/or DBP \>120; for patients treated with a lytic, sustained hypertension despite treatment with SBP \>185 and/or DBP \>110
24. Treatment with heparin within 48 hours with a partial thromboplastic time more than two times the laboratory normal or treatment with any LMWH within 48 hours
25. Renal failure with serum creatinine \>3.0 or Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \<30
26. Ongoing seizure due to stroke
27. Evidence of active systemic infection
28. Known cancer with metastases
29. Angiographic evidence of a dissection in the extracranial or intracranial cerebral arteries
30. Arterial stenosis requiring balloon angioplasty or stenting at the time of the procedure
31. Angiographic evidence of multiple cerebrovascular occlusions (e.g., bilateral anterior circulation, anterior/posterior circulation, tandem occlusions)
32. Angiographic evidence of known or suspected underlying intracranial vasculopathy or atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion
33. Angiographic evidence or suspicion of aortic dissection
34. Angiographic evidence of an aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the territory of the target lesion
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Route 92 Medical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guilherme Dabus, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baptist Health - Miami
Ajit Puri, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Thanh Nguyen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banner Health
Mesa, Arizona, United States
Mercy San Juan Medical Center
Carmichael, California, United States
Christiana Care
Newark, Delaware, United States
Baptist Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Advocate Aurora Health
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Kansas
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Tufts
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Massachusetts
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Saint Luke's
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, United States
Rutgers
Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
Stony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio Health
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Mercy Health St. Vincent
Toledo, Ohio, United States
OHSU
Portland, Oregon, United States
Geisinger Clinic
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Fort Sanders Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, United States
Valley Baptist
Harlingen, Texas, United States
Medical City Plano
Plano, Texas, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, , New Zealand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nguyen TN, Dabus G, McGuinness B, Caldwell J, Priest R, Rai AT, Zaidat OO, Gross BA, Hanel R, Lee S, Hussain S, Shaikh H, Abdalkader M, Budzik R, Kilburg C, Woodward K, Colasurdo M, Liu J, Yoo AJ, Khandelwal P, Boo S, Vu P, Lin E, Almajali M, Singh J, Al-Bayati A, Lang MJ, Abraham M, Hassan AE, Pema P, Martin C, Grandhi R, Tonetti DA, Hixson HR, Aghaebrahim A, Sauvageau E, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Yavagal DR, Cheng-Ching E, Khalife J, Linfante I, Vulkanov V, Soomro J, Fifi JT, Maidan L, Copelan A, Schirmer CM, Bain M, Toth G, Jayaraman M, Novakovic-White R, Satti S, Villelli N, Jabbour P, Page M, McAllister DJ, Araujo Contreras R, Samaniego EA, Liebeskind DS, Hetts SW, Nogueira RG, English J, Puri AS. SUMMIT MAX: A Randomized Trial of the Super Large Bore HiPoint Reperfusion System Versus Vecta System for Aspiration Thrombectomy. Stroke. 2025 Aug;56(8):1980-1990. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051742. Epub 2025 May 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIP 0974
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.