Resin Bulkfill Dual-Cured of Proximal Restoration. Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT05013853
Last Updated: 2022-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-15
2021-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Materials and methods: Experimental, clinical, controlled, randomized, double-blind study. For the evaluation of Fill-up! (FU) will be clinically compared to the control groups of a conventional Tetric N-Ceram (TB) RBK and Filtek z350 (z350) conventional composite resin. The adhesive process will be carried out under absolute isolation, of selective etching of 37% orthophosphoric acid enamel before applying the respective adhesive according to the trademark of the composite resins. The evaluation will be to 30 days, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months using the modified FDI criteria of postoperative sensitivity, marginal staining, color, marginal adaptation and anatomy, being 1: Excellent, 2: Good, 3: Fair, 4: unsatisfactory and 5: unacceptable. The non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test and Friedman (95% significance) used to compare the criteria.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A RCT to Compare Post-operative Sensitivity of Restorations With Fill-Up, a Dual Curing Composite and Conventional Composite Resin
NCT03513692
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
NCT03343184
Evaluation of ART Restorations Using Two Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials in Primary Molars
NCT06771362
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Resin Z350 of proximal posterior teeth
Restorative with Z350 composite of proximal caries lesions or restorations replacement
Restoration teeth
Remove caries and restore with resin composite
Resin Tetric N Ceram Bulkfill of proximal posterior teeth
Restorative with Tetric N Ceram Bulkfill composite of proximal caries lesions or restorations replacement
Restoration teeth
Remove caries and restore with resin composite
Resin Fill Up! of proximal posterior teeth
Restorative with Fill Up! composite of proximal caries lesions or restorations replacement
Restoration teeth
Remove caries and restore with resin composite
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Restoration teeth
Remove caries and restore with resin composite
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* high cariogenic risk,
* availability for clinical follow-up,
* have at least 3 teeth with occlusal and / or proximal carious lesions of molars or premolars with occlusal and proximal contact,
* lesions less than 1/3 of inter-cuspal distance and depth\> 3 mm in the cervical-occlusal direction and margin on enamel
Exclusion Criteria
* evidence of xerostomia
* uncontrolled periodontal disease,
* pregnant or breastfeeding
* bruxism or with temporomandibular disorder
* history of allergy to acrylic or its derivatives,
* portador of removable prostheses endodontically treated teeth
* cracked teeth and periapical pathology or pulp pathology symptoms.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Nacional Andres Bello
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Patricio Vildosola Grez
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patricio Vildosola
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidad Andre Bello
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Patricio Vildosola Grez
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PROPRGFO_002019.25.
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.