Rethinking Observations in Mental Health

NCT ID: NCT05013411

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-15

Study Completion Date

2022-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To gain healthcare workers' perception of the current observations practices used in patient care and explore the benefits of using technology to enhance observations in inpatient mental health setting in the United Kingdom.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Periodic intermittent clinical observations are commonly used in mental health services at admission for risk assessment and then for the clinical management of patients.

Nurses follow these practices as routine care to ensure patient well-being. However, being observed may make patients feel uncomfortable and anxious.

The Department of Health (2006) stipulated for the practice of observation to be implemented in a manner that would enable patients to experience it as a healing and compassionate practice. This is apparently not always realised as there are reported differences on how patients are observed, and clinical data obtained.

Whilst this may be attributed in part to lack of or limited training on the use of observations, it can also in part be attributed to lack of a standardised approach to implementation and documentation of the outcomes of observations (Stewart \& Bowers 2012).This contributes to variability among healthcare workers in their interpretation of the outcomes/data of observations. Given that patients' care pathways are influenced by the outcomes/data of observations, it is critical to reduce the variability in the use of this practice. Doing so would lead to obtaining consistent and dependable data that reflect patients' mental state to guide their individual care pathways.

The focus of this qualitative study is to document how clinicians perform routine patient observations, the essential aspects of observations through a clinician's point of view and how can application of modern technology aid this process. This systematic documentation will capture the strengths and limitations of current practice creating a service provide based dataset to inform focused improvements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vital Signs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthcare workers

Healthcare workers with patient care experience and are willing to share their experience of current practices of obtaining patient observations.

Qualitative study

Intervention Type OTHER

Individual interviews and focus groups will be conducted to explore current strengthens and barriers in obtaining patient observations. Views on use of technology in assisting with patient observations will also be discussed and documented.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Qualitative study

Individual interviews and focus groups will be conducted to explore current strengthens and barriers in obtaining patient observations. Views on use of technology in assisting with patient observations will also be discussed and documented.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthcare workers such as nurse directors, matrons, ward managers, nurses, healthcare support workers, including; nurse associates, nurse assistants and assistant practioners who work in inpatient mental health settings
* Healthcare workers with at least two years' experience of working in inpatient mental settings
* Healthcare workers who conduct or have conducted patient observations, and have used it for at least two years

Exclusion Criteria

Students and clinicians in training who do not carry out independent patient observations.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oxehealth Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ade Odunlade

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central North West London NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ade Odunlade

London, London, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

295362

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Self-Criticism Feasibility Study
NCT03215134 COMPLETED NA