Endoscopic Stricturotomy Versus Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in Patients With Crohn's Disease and Symptomatic Small Bowel Stricture
NCT ID: NCT05009212
Last Updated: 2021-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Endoscopic management shows good efficacy and safety in the treatment of strictures in CD patients. The European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) guideline recommended that endoscopic balloon dilatation is suitable to treat short \[\<5 cm\] strictures of the terminal ileum in CD. Recently, Lan et al. reported that endoscopic stricturotomy appeared to be more effective in treating CD patients with anastomotic stricture than endoscopic balloon dilatation.
However, there is no prospective clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of endoscopic stricturotomy in the treatment of fibrostenotic Crohn's disease. The trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic stricturotomy with endoscopic balloon dilation in the treatment of small bowel stricture in patients with Crohn's Disease.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Endoscopic Strictureplasty vs. Balloon Dilation in Crohn's Disease Strictures
NCT06203782
Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Stricturotomy for Short Crohn's Strictures
NCT05521867
Hybrid Endoscopic Stricturotomy Plus Balloon Dilation Versus Stricturotomy Alone for Short Crohn's Disease Strictures
NCT06958159
Pre-stenotic Inflammation Following Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in Crohn's Disease: A Prospective Study
NCT04803916
Prospective Multicenter Randomized Comparative Study of the Treatment of de Novo Stenosis in Chron's Disease.
NCT04330846
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESt group
Endoscopic stricturotomy
Endoscopic stricturotomy
Endoscopic stricturotomy for bowel stricture (\<5 cm)
EBD group
Endoscopic balloon dilatation
Endoscopic balloon dilatation
Endoscopic balloon dilatation for bowel stricture (\<5 cm)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic stricturotomy
Endoscopic stricturotomy for bowel stricture (\<5 cm)
Endoscopic balloon dilatation
Endoscopic balloon dilatation for bowel stricture (\<5 cm)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject is in remission from CD (CDAI score \< 150)
3. Subjects had clinical findings of multiple fibrotic strictures of the bowel with obstruction and imaging evidence, and/or endoscopic evidence
4. Subjects had ≤ 3 small bowel strictures (length \< 5 cm) from duodenum to rectum and \< 50 cm distance between strictures
5. Study process prior to initiation, the subject or subject's legal representative (if applicable) signed and dated a written informed consent form or any required documentation of privacy authorization
6. Female subjects who remained sexually and of childbearing potential with an ungerminated male partner, consented to adequate routine contraception throughout the study period starting with signing informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects were in active CD (CDAI score ≥ 150)
3. The subject had inflammatory activity in the stenotic bowel (as judged by a combination of blood inflammatory indices, endoscopy, ultrasound and imaging)
4. Presence of ileostomy, colostomy
5. Subjects had a history or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that had not been resected or had a history or evidence of dysplasia of the colonic mucosa, including low - or high-grade dysplasia, and an undiagnosed type of dysplasia
6. Subjects had suspected or confirmed ulcerative colitis, undiagnosed types of colitis, ischemic colitis, radiation enteritis, colitis associated diverticular disease, or microscopic colitis
7. Subjects had evidence of active infection during the screening period
8. Subject has active tuberculosis
9. Subjects with any defined inborn or acquired immunodeficiency (e.g., common various immunodeficiencies, human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\] infection, organ transplantation)
10. Subjects had a clinically significant infection (e.g., pneumonia, pyelonephritis) or an ongoing chronic infection within 30 days prior to screening
11. The subject suffered from any unstable or uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immune, endocrine / metabolic or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the outcome of the study or jeopardize the safety of the subject
12. The subject's medical history included malignancy
13. Subjects had abnormal laboratory results for any of the following during screening: hemoglobin \< 5 g / dl; white blood cell (WBC) count \< 3 ×10E9 / L; platelet count \< 100 × 10E9 / L or \> 1200 × 10E9 / L; alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) \> 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN), and serum creatinine \> 2 × ULN.
14. Subjects were unable to attend all study visits or comply with study flow plans female subjects were pregnant prior to study enrollment, during study enrollment, or plan to donate eggs during these time periods
15. Subjects were forced to consent to participate in the study
16. Investigators considered the subject unsuitable for endoscopic treatment
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Qin Guo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021ZSLYEC-243
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.