Lenvatinib Plus HAIC of Modified FOLFOX Regime vs Lenvatinib Plus HAIC of ROX Regime in Patients With Advanced HCC
NCT ID: NCT05007587
Last Updated: 2021-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
EARLY_PHASE1
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-01
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lenvatinib, Tislelizumab Combined With RALOX Regimen HAIC in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT05954897
Sorafenib or Lenvatinib Plus HAIC of 130 mg/m² Oxaliplatin, and 5-fu vs Sorafenib or Lenvatinib Plus HAIC of 85mg/m² Oxaliplatin, and 5-fu for Unresectable Advanced HCC: a Randomised Phase 3 Trial
NCT04687163
HAIC Plus Lenvatinib and PD-1 Antibody Versus HAIC Plus Lenvatinib for Advanced HCC
NCT03803254
Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Raltetrexed With Oxaliplatin(SALOX) Versus FOLFOX in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT05231382
Phase Ⅱ Study of HAIC of FOLFOX vs. Sorafenib in HCC Refractory to TACE
NCT03722498
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of mFOLFOX regimen
Cohort1:Participants were treated with 8mg lenvatinib (weight\<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight\>60kg) orally once daily on days 1 through 21, and HAIC regimen was performed every 3 weeks. The mFOLFOX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 85mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 2 on day1 ; leucovorin , 400mg/m2 , from hour 2 to 3 on day 1 ; fluorouracil , 400mg/m2 , bolus at hour 3 ; and 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours on days 1 and 2.
Lenvatinib
8mg lenvatinib (weight\<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight\>60kg) QD
mFOLFOX regimen
HAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The mFOLFOX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 85mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 2 on day1 ; leucovorin , 400mg/m2 , from hour 2 to 3 on day 1 ; fluorouracil , 400mg/m2 , bolus at hour 3 ; and 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours on days 1 and 2.3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1.
Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of ROX regimen
Cohort2:Participants were treated with 8mg lenvatinib (weight\<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight\>60kg) orally once daily on days 1 through 21, and HAIC regimen was performed every 3 weeks. The ROX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 100mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 4 on day1 ;raltitrexed , 3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1.
Lenvatinib
8mg lenvatinib (weight\<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight\>60kg) QD
ROX regimen
HAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The ROX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 100mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 4 on day1 ;raltitrexed , 3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lenvatinib
8mg lenvatinib (weight\<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight\>60kg) QD
mFOLFOX regimen
HAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The mFOLFOX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 85mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 2 on day1 ; leucovorin , 400mg/m2 , from hour 2 to 3 on day 1 ; fluorouracil , 400mg/m2 , bolus at hour 3 ; and 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours on days 1 and 2.3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1.
ROX regimen
HAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The ROX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 100mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 4 on day1 ;raltitrexed , 3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with HCC confirmed by histopathology or meeting the clinical diagnostic criteria in the 2019 edition of the diagnostic and therapeutic criteria for primary liver cancer;
3. BCLC stage C patients with vascular invasion and without extrahepatic metastasis;
4. Child Pugh liver function classification: A or B grade;
5. ECOG physical strength score was 0-2 points;
6. No previous systemic or local treatment, and the expected survival time is more than 3 months;
7. According to recist1.1, the patient must have at least one measurable target lesion that has passed CT or MRI examination, and the tumor imaging evaluation was conducted within 2 weeks before receiving the study drug;
8. Full organ and bone marrow function: WBC ≥ 3.0 × 109/L; NE≥1.5 × 109/L; PLT≥75 × 109/L; Liver and kidney function ALT and AST ≤ 5uln; TBIL≤2ULN; Albumin ≥ 28g / L; Cr≤1.5 ULN; International normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.5 or prothrombin time (PT) exceeding the normal control range ≤ 4 seconds;
Exclusion Criteria
2. Uncontrollable ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or esophageal variceal bleeding;
3. Patients with hypertension who can not be reduced to normal range after antihypertensive drug treatment (systolic blood pressure \> 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg);
4. Patients with myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction above grade II, poorly controlled arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction above grade II, poorly controlled arrhythmia (QTc interval ≥ 450 ms) (QTc interval was calculated by fridericia formula);
5. Patients with history of gastrointestinal bleeding or definite tendency of gastrointestinal bleeding in the past 3 months, such as esophageal varices with bleeding risk, local active ulcer lesions, fecal occult blood ≥ +, can not be included in the group;
6. Pregnant or lactating women, patients with fertility are unwilling or unable to take effective contraceptive measures;
7. patients with a history of HIV infection;
8. The researcher judges other situations that may affect the clinical research and the judgment of research results;
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
OTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
OTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
OTHER
Shaoxing People's Hospital
OTHER
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
OTHER
Jinhua Central Hospital
OTHER
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jiaping Zheng, Doctor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, Dicker DJ, Chimed-Orchir O, Dandona R, Dandona L, Fleming T, Forouzanfar MH, Hancock J, Hay RJ, Hunter-Merrill R, Huynh C, Hosgood HD, Johnson CO, Jonas JB, Khubchandani J, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Lan Q, Larson HJ, Liang X, Lim SS, Lopez AD, MacIntyre MF, Marczak L, Marquez N, Mokdad AH, Pinho C, Pourmalek F, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Sandar L, Sartorius B, Schwartz SM, Shackelford KA, Shibuya K, Stanaway J, Steiner C, Sun J, Takahashi K, Vollset SE, Vos T, Wagner JA, Wang H, Westerman R, Zeeb H, Zoeckler L, Abd-Allah F, Ahmed MB, Alabed S, Alam NK, Aldhahri SF, Alem G, Alemayohu MA, Ali R, Al-Raddadi R, Amare A, Amoako Y, Artaman A, Asayesh H, Atnafu N, Awasthi A, Saleem HB, Barac A, Bedi N, Bensenor I, Berhane A, Bernabe E, Betsu B, Binagwaho A, Boneya D, Campos-Nonato I, Castaneda-Orjuela C, Catala-Lopez F, Chiang P, Chibueze C, Chitheer A, Choi JY, Cowie B, Damtew S, das Neves J, Dey S, Dharmaratne S, Dhillon P, Ding E, Driscoll T, Ekwueme D, Endries AY, Farvid M, Farzadfar F, Fernandes J, Fischer F, G/Hiwot TT, Gebru A, Gopalani S, Hailu A, Horino M, Horita N, Husseini A, Huybrechts I, Inoue M, Islami F, Jakovljevic M, James S, Javanbakht M, Jee SH, Kasaeian A, Kedir MS, Khader YS, Khang YH, Kim D, Leigh J, Linn S, Lunevicius R, El Razek HMA, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Marcenes W, Markos D, Melaku YA, Meles KG, Mendoza W, Mengiste DT, Meretoja TJ, Miller TR, Mohammad KA, Mohammadi A, Mohammed S, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nagel G, Nand D, Le Nguyen Q, Nolte S, Ogbo FA, Oladimeji KE, Oren E, Pa M, Park EK, Pereira DM, Plass D, Qorbani M, Radfar A, Rafay A, Rahman M, Rana SM, Soreide K, Satpathy M, Sawhney M, Sepanlou SG, Shaikh MA, She J, Shiue I, Shore HR, Shrime MG, So S, Soneji S, Stathopoulou V, Stroumpoulis K, Sufiyan MB, Sykes BL, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tessema GA, Thakur JS, Tran BX, Ukwaja KN, Uzochukwu BSC, Vlassov VV, Weiderpass E, Wubshet Terefe M, Yebyo HG, Yimam HH, Yonemoto N, Younis MZ, Yu C, Zaidi Z, Zaki MES, Zenebe ZM, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
Benson AB, D'Angelica MI, Abbott DE, Abrams TA, Alberts SR, Anaya DA, Anders R, Are C, Brown D, Chang DT, Cloyd J, Covey AM, Hawkins W, Iyer R, Jacob R, Karachristos A, Kelley RK, Kim R, Palta M, Park JO, Sahai V, Schefter T, Sicklick JK, Singh G, Sohal D, Stein S, Tian GG, Vauthey JN, Venook AP, Hammond LJ, Darlow SD. Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Apr 1;17(4):302-310. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0019.
Spallanzani A, Orsi G, Andrikou K, Gelsomino F, Rimini M, Riggi L, Cascinu S. Lenvatinib as a therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Nov;18(11):1069-1076. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1524297. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Song DS, Song MJ, Bae SH, Chung WJ, Jang JY, Kim YS, Lee SH, Park JY, Yim HJ, Cho SB, Park SY, Yang JM. A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;50(4):445-54. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0978-3. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
Obi S, Sato S, Kawai T. Current Status of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy. Liver Cancer. 2015 Sep;4(3):188-99. doi: 10.1159/000367746. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Lyu N, Kong Y, Mu L, Lin Y, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zheng L, Deng H, Li S, Xie Q, Guo R, Shi M, Xu L, Cai X, Wu P, Zhao M. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
Zhuang BW, Li W, Xie XH, Hu HT, Lu MD, Xie XY. Sorafenib versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;49(9):845-855. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz069.
Chen S, Zhang K, Liu W, Yu W. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed in patients with intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II, single-arm, prospective study. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;134:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
He M, Li Q, Zou R, Shen J, Fang W, Tan G, Zhou Y, Wu X, Xu L, Wei W, Le Y, Zhou Z, Zhao M, Guo Y, Guo R, Chen M, Shi M. Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin vs Sorafenib Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):953-960. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0250.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZJPIRB-2021-211
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.