Geriatric-assessment Interventions to Address Functional Deficits in Older Adults w Multiple Myeloma
NCT ID: NCT04999085
Last Updated: 2025-02-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-01
2023-08-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Along with having a higher risk for myeloma, older adults have an increased chance of developing other health problems or issues. However, not everyone ages in the same way. Some older adults experience major changes in health or degree of independence at relatively younger ages, while others remain quite healthy for many years. The specific issues that develop with age can also vary from person to person. One older adult may face difficulties with vision or hearing, while another may develop memory problems.
Historically, cancer doctors have not done a very good job identifying these non-cancer issues. As a result, research has focused on better ways to systematically pick up on issues that may impact cancer outcomes or quality of life. The outgrowth of this research is assessments and questionnaires referred to as "comprehensive geriatric assessments," which evaluate the health and functionality of older adults thoroughly but efficiently. In both myeloma and other types of cancer, problems identified through geriatric assessments have been shown to predict how likely people are to develop side effects of cancer treatment and predict how long people are likely to live with cancer.
Prior research has not addressed how best to help with the issues picked up through a geriatric assessment among patients undergoing treatment for myeloma, although a number of effective interventions have been shown to benefit older adults with similar problems in other settings. Therefore, the current study will test a strategy of systematically screening older adults undergoing myeloma treatment for geriatric-assessment-related deficits and referring participants to appropriate services and resources. The geriatric assessment in this study includes tests of mobility, memory, vision, hearing, and nutrition as well as questions about symptoms and social support. Individuals who have deficits in one of these areas will be referred to relevant services and resources such as physical therapy, a pharmacist, or the cancer center support program. They will then repeat the same assessment three months later, and the results will be compared to their original assessment to see if the deficit has improved, with particular attention to mobility and social support.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Geriatric Assessments in Senior Adults With Multiple Myeloma
NCT01746030
Assessment of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Medicare Beneficiaries With Multiple Myeloma
NCT03127761
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Patients Over 65 Years
NCT01671826
Evaluation of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Laboratory Biomarkers in Elderly Patients With Multiple Myeloma
NCT05918185
Protocol to Obtain Blood and Bone Marrow Samples for Myeloma Research
NCT01382615
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study participants complete a baseline Geriatric Assessment and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life of Cancer Patients (QLQ) Core 30 (C30) and Myeloma supplement (MY20) questionnaires, either at the time of enrollment or as part of previous research studies.
Based on these assessments, an intervention strategy is developed by Study Team. These interventions largely consist of referrals to relevant specialists and existing services. These recommendations are communicated to the study participant, and participant-approved intervention referrals are made.
Following an initial appointment with these specialists, further follow-up will be determined based on the subject and specialist without input from the Study Team.
At three months from enrollment, study participants will be asked to complete a follow-up geriatric assessment, repeat EORTC questionnaires, and a satisfaction /feedback survey.
Duration of Therapy:
For patients referred to specialists as above, the duration of treatment or care with the specialist will be determined based on an agreement between the specialist and study participant.
Duration of Follow-up:
As part of this study, participants will only be followed through the three-month follow-up assessment described above. For subjects participating in or recruited from other research studies, follow-up according to those other protocols will continue.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supportive Care
Supportive care interventions
Subjects will be referred to specialists and/or supportive care interventions based on issues/deficits identified on a baseline geriatric assessment. These interventions will be selected based on deficits or problems identified on baseline assessments. These include referral to physical/occupational therapy for those with physical deficits (Activities of Daily Living impairment, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living impairment, Timed Up and Go, or falls), to optometry/ophthalmology (for visual impairment), to audiology (for hearing impairment), to pharmacist (for polypharmacy), and to cancer center support program (for Mental Health Index 13 criteria).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supportive care interventions
Subjects will be referred to specialists and/or supportive care interventions based on issues/deficits identified on a baseline geriatric assessment. These interventions will be selected based on deficits or problems identified on baseline assessments. These include referral to physical/occupational therapy for those with physical deficits (Activities of Daily Living impairment, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living impairment, Timed Up and Go, or falls), to optometry/ophthalmology (for visual impairment), to audiology (for hearing impairment), to pharmacist (for polypharmacy), and to cancer center support program (for Mental Health Index 13 criteria).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Enrollment in an existing registry of individuals with plasma cell disorder (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03717844; institutional protocol # LCCC1728)
* Be willing and capable of providing informed consent.
Presence of at least one intervenable deficit on the most recent registry assessment:
* Activities of daily living score \< 14.
* Instrumental activities of living score \< 14.
* Timed Up and Go test = 14 seconds (or unable to complete the test).
* One fall in the prior 6 months.
* Eyesight poor or worse.
* Hearing poor or worse.
* Number of daily medications 10 or greater.
* Mental Health Index-13 Depression score 12 or greater.
* Mental Health Index-13 Anxiety score 6 or greater.
Exclusion Criteria
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Conquer Cancer Foundation
OTHER
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christopher E Jensen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The N.C. Cancer Hospital
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
University of North Carolina (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021YIA-7316118933
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
LCCC 2101
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.