Growth Hormone as a Model for Reversible Activation of Adipose Tissue Fibrosis
NCT ID: NCT04998500
Last Updated: 2023-05-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: GH induces adipose tissue fibrosis by increased FAPα expression together with proliferation and fibrogenic differentiation of fibro-adipogenic progenitor (FAP) cells.
Aim: To unravel the mechanisms underlying GH-induced adipose tissue fibrosis with emphasis on FAPα expression and proliferation of FAP cells.
Subjects and methods: In a single blinded, randomized, double-dummy crossover design, 10 adult, moderately overweight individuals will be subjected to one week of GH and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant). We will use single-cell technologies, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), RNA sequencing, and cell culture studies on adipose tissue samples, combined with in vivo assessment of adipose tissue turnover and metabolism.
Perspectives: Understanding fibrosis formation in human models may identify new targets for treatment of obesity-associated disorders.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tissue Biomarker for Pegvisomant Action
NCT01261000
Growth Hormone Signaling in Vivo in Humans
NCT00512473
Lipolytic Effects of GH in Human Subjects in Vivo
NCT02782221
Growth Hormone, IGF-1 and Medical Treatment in Acromegaly: Are There Effects on Gut Hormone Physiology and Postprandial Substrate Metabolism?
NCT02152124
Substrate Metabolism, Growth Hormone Signaling, and Insulin Sensitivity During Fasting
NCT02500095
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Little is known about the mechanisms underlying GH-induced fibrosis, but recent evidence points to a potential involvement of FAPα, an enzyme that is highly expressed in mouse AT FAP cells (9). Moreover, we have recently reported that human skeletal muscle FAP cells upregulate FAPα (DPP4) during fibrogenic differentiation (19). FAPα is a subunit of a heterodimeric proteinase complex attached to the cell membrane in addition to a soluble form also present in the circulation (10). Several proteins are recognized as FAPα substrates, including collagen type I (11) and III (12), and FAPα appears to play a significant role in hepatic tissue remodeling (13) and in lung fibrosis (14). We have recently recorded elevated circulating levels of FAPα in active acromegaly, which correlates with collagen turnover reverses after disease control (15). Fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells are mesenchymal progenitors with the intrinsic potential to differentiate into either collagen-producing fibroblasts or adipocytes. They have been studied in murine cardiac and skeletal muscle, where they contribute to either fibrosis or fat deposition during muscle-impaired regeneration or degeneration (16-18). We have recently demonstrated that a subset of FAP cells drives the accumulation of ECM protein and adipocytes in the muscle from patients with type 2 diabetes and likely contributes to the poor metabolic and mechanical muscle function (19). Whether GH affects adipose tissue FAP cell proliferation and differentiation is unknown, but FAP cell proliferation is regulated by IGF-I (16), which is a strongly GH-dependent peptide. Increased FAP proliferation has also been reported to contribute to intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) in several conditions, and we have observed IMAT after treatment in acromegaly (unpublished data). Furthermore, we have preliminary data from FACS-isolated adipose tissue FAP cells incubated with serum from acromegaly patients, which suggest GH-dependent increased FAP cell proliferation and fibrogenic appearance. Collectively, these findings suggest that GH promotes a pro-proliferative and fibrogenic FAP phenotype at the expense of adipogenic differentiation.
Hypotheses: Growth hormone: 1) Activates FAPα protein expression, 2) Increases proliferation and fibrogenic differentiation of FAP cells, and 3) Induces reversible fibrosis in adipose tissue in humans
Subjects and methods: In a single blinded, randomized, double-dummy crossover design, 10 adult, moderately overweight individuals will be subjected to one week of GH and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant). Pegvisomant is a modfied GH molecule that selectively blocks the GH receptor and is a licensed drug for the treatment of acromegaly. We include Pegvisomant as an 'active control' in order to suppress endogenous GH actions. The participants will receive daily subcutaneous injections of growth hormone, 0.6-2.0 mg depending on age, for 7 days in the GH intervention. In the control intervention, the participants will receive daily subcutaneous injections of either Pegvisomant or saline. Pegvisomant in a dose of 30 mg is given two times, in the beginning and in the end of the control intervention, whereas saline is given on the other 5 days of the control intervention period. The two intervention periods are separated by a wash out period of 1-4 months. The participants will be randomized to either start with the GH intervention and next be subjected to the control intervention, or start with the control intervention and next be subjected to the GH intervention. The participants will meet at the hospital daily for the injections and a small blood sample. Each intervention period is initiated by an initiation day where there will be taken blood samples, adipose tissue and muscle samples, be performed temperature measurements and bioimpedance, and be administered heavy water and the first injection of intervention either GH or control intervention. On the first initiation day a DXA scan will be performed for assessment of body composition. Each intervention period will be terminated with a study day where there will be taken blood samples, adipose tissue and muscle samples, be performed temperature measurements, indirect calorimetry, palmitate tracer kinetics and bioimpedance, and be administered the last injection of intervention either GH or control intervention. The participants will be fasting for the initiation and study days, and during the intervention periods, they will log their intake of food and beverages.
Study outcomes:
Primary: FAP cell function, FAPα protein expression and markers of fibrosis in AT biopsies obtained before and after intervention. In particular, we will perform:
* FACS to quantify and isolate cell populations, including quantification of FAP cells in adipose tissue, and in vitro determination of proliferation and fibro-/adipogenic differentiation potential
* FAPα expression in blood and adipose tissue
* Markers of fibrosis in adipose tissue assessed by light microscopy and immunohistochemically, RNA sequencing and heavy water labeled connective tissue turnover
Secondary: to study the impact of GH exposure on:
* Circulating biomarkers of collagen turnover (PINP, PIIINP)
* Whole body energy metabolism and fatty acid turnover (indirect calorimetry and palmitate tracer kinetics)
* Connective tissue turnover in muscle tissue (heavy water (D2O) labeling)
* Temperature measurements
Statistical analysis plan: Comparison between groups will be performed using standard statistical methods (t-test or equivalent nonparametric test). Within group comparison will be performed using paired t-test of equivalent nonparametric test. Moreover, ANOVA (repeated measures) will be used. A p-value less than 0.05 will be regarded as statistically significant.
Perspective and relevance: This is the first study to investigate GH effects on adipose tissue fibrosis in humans, which has implications beyond GH pathophysiology. A deeper understanding of the pathways controlling fibroblast and adipocyte balance in fat tissue is essential groundwork and may unravel new targets for combating adipose tissue dysfunction and related disorders. As recently demonstrated in type 2 diabetic patients these progenitor cells are key mediators of tissue plasticity and function in humans (19).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
Participants are randomized to receive either control intervention first and then GH intervention, or GH intervention first and then control intervention.
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GH intervention - control intervention
Participants will receive daily subcutaneous injections of growth hormone for 7 days. Approximately 1-4 months later, the participants will receive daily subcutaneous injections of control intervention for 7 days consisting of saline and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant).
Growth hormone, saline and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant)
This study aims to uncover physiological effects of growth hormone (GH). The intervention with GH and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant) will therefore be used as tools to activate a well-known physiological response. Thus, this study is not a drug trial.
Control intervention - GH intervention
Participants will receive daily subcutaneous injections of control intervention for 7 days consisting of saline and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant). Approximately 1-4 months later, the participants will receive daily subcutaneous injections of growth hormone for 7 days.
Growth hormone, saline and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant)
This study aims to uncover physiological effects of growth hormone (GH). The intervention with GH and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant) will therefore be used as tools to activate a well-known physiological response. Thus, this study is not a drug trial.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Growth hormone, saline and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant)
This study aims to uncover physiological effects of growth hormone (GH). The intervention with GH and GH receptor blockade (Pegvisomant) will therefore be used as tools to activate a well-known physiological response. Thus, this study is not a drug trial.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Legally competent subjects
* Healthy (except uncomplicated hypertension and hypercholesterolemia)
* Male sex
* Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 50 years
* BMI 25-35
Exclusion Criteria
* Known of presumed acute of chronic illness
18 Years
50 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amanda Bæk, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Aarhus
Jens Otto L Jørgensen, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Aarhus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Munoz A, Abate N, Chandalia M. Adipose tissue collagen and inflammation in nonobese Asian Indian men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Aug;98(8):E1360-3. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3841. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
Lawler HM, Underkofler CM, Kern PA, Erickson C, Bredbeck B, Rasouli N. Adipose Tissue Hypoxia, Inflammation, and Fibrosis in Obese Insulin-Sensitive and Obese Insulin-Resistant Subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Apr;101(4):1422-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-4125. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
Moller N, Jorgensen JO. Effects of growth hormone on glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism in human subjects. Endocr Rev. 2009 Apr;30(2):152-77. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0027. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
Melmed S. Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment. J Clin Invest. 2009 Nov;119(11):3189-202. doi: 10.1172/JCI39375. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
Longobardi S, Keay N, Ehrnborg C, Cittadini A, Rosen T, Dall R, Boroujerdi MA, Bassett EE, Healy ML, Pentecost C, Wallace JD, Powrie J, Jorgensen JO, Sacca L. Growth hormone (GH) effects on bone and collagen turnover in healthy adults and its potential as a marker of GH abuse in sports: a double blind, placebo-controlled study. The GH-2000 Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Apr;85(4):1505-12. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.4.6551.
Doessing S, Heinemeier KM, Holm L, Mackey AL, Schjerling P, Rennie M, Smith K, Reitelseder S, Kappelgaard AM, Rasmussen MH, Flyvbjerg A, Kjaer M. Growth hormone stimulates the collagen synthesis in human tendon and skeletal muscle without affecting myofibrillar protein synthesis. J Physiol. 2010 Jan 15;588(Pt 2):341-51. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.179325. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
Doessing S, Holm L, Heinemeier KM, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Schjerling P, Qvortrup K, Larsen JO, Nielsen RH, Flyvbjerg A, Kjaer M. GH and IGF1 levels are positively associated with musculotendinous collagen expression: experiments in acromegalic and GH deficiency patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010 Dec;163(6):853-62. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0818. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
Householder LA, Comisford R, Duran-Ortiz S, Lee K, Troike K, Wilson C, Jara A, Harberson M, List EO, Kopchick JJ, Berryman DE. Increased fibrosis: A novel means by which GH influences white adipose tissue function. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2018 Apr;39:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
Merrick D, Sakers A, Irgebay Z, Okada C, Calvert C, Morley MP, Percec I, Seale P. Identification of a mesenchymal progenitor cell hierarchy in adipose tissue. Science. 2019 Apr 26;364(6438):eaav2501. doi: 10.1126/science.aav2501.
Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrell MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014 Jun;8(5-6):454-63. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300095. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Park JE, Lenter MC, Zimmermann RN, Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ. Fibroblast activation protein, a dual specificity serine protease expressed in reactive human tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1999 Dec 17;274(51):36505-12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36505.
Christiansen VJ, Jackson KW, Lee KN, McKee PA. Effect of fibroblast activation protein and alpha2-antiplasmin cleaving enzyme on collagen types I, III, and IV. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Jan 15;457(2):177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.11.006. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
Levy MT, McCaughan GW, Marinos G, Gorrell MD. Intrahepatic expression of the hepatic stellate cell marker fibroblast activation protein correlates with the degree of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infection. Liver. 2002 Apr;22(2):93-101. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2002.01503.x.
Fan MH, Zhu Q, Li HH, Ra HJ, Majumdar S, Gulick DL, Jerome JA, Madsen DH, Christofidou-Solomidou M, Speicher DW, Bachovchin WW, Feghali-Bostwick C, Pure E. Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) Accelerates Collagen Degradation and Clearance from Lungs in Mice. J Biol Chem. 2016 Apr 8;291(15):8070-89. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.701433. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
Arlien-Soborg MC, Grondahl C, Baek A, Dal J, Madsen M, Hogild ML, Pedersen SB, Bjerre M, Jorgensen JOL. Fibroblast Activation Protein is a GH Target: A Prospective Study of Patients with Acromegaly Before and After Treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jan 1;105(1):dgz033. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz033.
Farup J, Madaro L, Puri PL, Mikkelsen UR. Interactions between muscle stem cells, mesenchymal-derived cells and immune cells in muscle homeostasis, regeneration and disease. Cell Death Dis. 2015 Jul 23;6(7):e1830. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.198.
Joe AW, Yi L, Natarajan A, Le Grand F, So L, Wang J, Rudnicki MA, Rossi FM. Muscle injury activates resident fibro/adipogenic progenitors that facilitate myogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2010 Feb;12(2):153-63. doi: 10.1038/ncb2015. Epub 2010 Jan 17.
Uezumi A, Fukada S, Yamamoto N, Takeda S, Tsuchida K. Mesenchymal progenitors distinct from satellite cells contribute to ectopic fat cell formation in skeletal muscle. Nat Cell Biol. 2010 Feb;12(2):143-52. doi: 10.1038/ncb2014. Epub 2010 Jan 17.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Reference number 19
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-10-72-283-20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.