Effectiveness of Pain and Exercise Training With Telerehabilitation on Lumbar Facet Joint Arthrosis

NCT ID: NCT04981132

Last Updated: 2023-08-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-15

Study Completion Date

2022-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study investigates the effects of pain and exercise training via telerehabilitation method on pain, pain beliefs, trunk mobility, functionality, and quality of life in individuals with low back pain caused by facet joint arthrosis. Forty - five individuals are planning to include in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups: Group 1: Pain education + exercise training group, Group 2: Exercise training group, and Group 3: Control group. The same physiotherapist will make evaluations via an online conference system. Group 1 will have pain neuroscience education and progressive therapeutic exercise training in a session for six weeks, twice a week, and Group 2 will have progressive therapeutic exercise training in a session for six weeks, twice a week, for six weeks, in total twelve sessions. Group 3 participants will be taken to the waiting list. Clinical and demographic data of the 45 participants in the study will be taken pre and post interventions. The primary outcomes are; the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes are the Active Straight Leg Raise Test (A- SLR), The Pain Belief Questionnaire (PBQ), and the Short Form Quality of Life Form (SF-12). Statistical analysis will be run through the SPSS 20.0 package program.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

'Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is one of the cognitive approaches among conservative treatments, and has been one of the most inquisitive approaches. The content of the education includes the physiology of pain, types of pain, the areas in which it is represented in the brain, its effect on body image, and psychosocial dimensions. Education aims to break the patient's misinformation and perception about pain and teach how to manage pain. It aims to inform patients about the neurophysiological and neurobiological processes related to the pain experience and help change their misinformation about pain conditions. Improved pain knowledge changes attitudes and beliefs about pain, reduces destructive thoughts, and fear of pain, and improves physical performance. It is known to reduce pain and disability according to short-term results in patients with chronic pain with central sensitization. According to systematic reviews, PNE is moderately effective in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. In addition, it is stated that the use of educational approaches based on the neurophysiology of pain offers clinical benefits not only in physical terms but also in psychosocial terms. Since maladaptive psychosocial factors (for example, negative emotions, poor self-efficacy, and maladaptive beliefs) are associated with pain behaviors, it is thought that increasing pain knowledge will have an impact on pain perception. In a study conducted on patients with musculoskeletal pain who experience different types of pain, an inverse relationship between pain intensity and knowledge level was shown.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the interest in the telerehabilitation method has increased, and it has become reachable easier with more evidence value on this subject. However, physiotherapists are healthcare professionals who work face-to-face with patients; depending on the pandemic curfews, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended not to continue face-to-face practices, except in emergencies, to protect patients' and physiotherapists' health. While digital options such as sensors, wearable technologies, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence are considered a solution, Tele-Rehabilitation (TR) can be the most practical, reachable, and cheaper solution to existing problems.

Systematic research and meta-analyses examining the effect of the telerehabilitation method and comparing it with traditional rehabilitation have revealed similar gains in outcome measures such as pain intensity and quality of life. It has been reported that simultaneous TR has comparable and effective results with face-to-face rehabilitation on pain and function in musculoskeletal problems. The telerehabilitation method is effective and cost-effective, especially in low back pain. Revealing the effects with more specific patient groups is the common recommendation of the studies.

In line with this information, the study's primary purpose is to determine the effects of PNE and progressive therapeutic exercise training given by the physiotherapist with the telerehabilitation method on pain, disability, pain beliefs, and quality of life. The secondary aim is to compare the effectiveness of progressive therapeutic exercise training alone or with PNE.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Facet Joint Arthrosis Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Education+Exercise Group

Group 1: Patients will have 15 minutes of pain neuroscience education (PNE) and 30 minutes of progressive therapeutic exercise training (PTE) with the telerehabilitation method.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pain Neuroscience education + Progressive therapeutic exercise training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The education group will have a comprehensive patient education which includes; description, transmission, representation of pain, central sensitization, neuroplasticity, its relation to body systems, psychosocial and emotional factors affecting pain, pain behavior, and lifestyle changes to cope with pain, etc. Plus, the group will have supervised progressive therapeutic exercises via the telerehabilitation method.

Exercise group

Group 2: Patients will have 45 minutes of progressive therapeutic exercise training (PTE) with the telerehabilitation method.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Progressive therapeutic exercise training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The exercise group will have supervised progressive therapeutic exercises via the telerehabilitation method.

Control Group

Group 3: Participants will be taken for the waiting list after evaluation with the telerehabilitation method.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pain Neuroscience education + Progressive therapeutic exercise training

The education group will have a comprehensive patient education which includes; description, transmission, representation of pain, central sensitization, neuroplasticity, its relation to body systems, psychosocial and emotional factors affecting pain, pain behavior, and lifestyle changes to cope with pain, etc. Plus, the group will have supervised progressive therapeutic exercises via the telerehabilitation method.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Progressive therapeutic exercise training

The exercise group will have supervised progressive therapeutic exercises via the telerehabilitation method.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* volunteering,
* being the ages of 40 to 64
* having a diagnosis of Grade 1 or 2 facet joint arthrosis according to Pathria classification
* having pain for at least 12 weeks, primarily due to facet joint arthrosis
* having a pain score between 3 and 8 according to the Numerical Pain Scale (NRS)
* not having received education about pain before,
* having computer and internet access

Exclusion Criteria

* having a BMI of 30 and above
* to have had conservative treatment or surgery in the lumbar region in the last 6 months,
* having severe deformity in the lower extremity
* having red or orange (pregnancy, disc pathology, infection, fracture, cancer, stenosis, severe osteoporosis, schmorl nodule, cauda equina syndrome, etc.) signs defined for low back pain
* having a regular exercise habit,
* having a seronegative rheumatological disease,
* having general pain syndrome.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Okan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Begüm Okudan

MSc. Pt

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clarke CL, Ryan CG, Martin DJ. Pain neurophysiology education for the management of individuals with chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Man Ther. 2011 Dec;16(6):544-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21705261 (View on PubMed)

Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O'Leary SP, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017 May;31(5):625-638. doi: 10.1177/0269215516645148. Epub 2016 May 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27141087 (View on PubMed)

Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Fatoye C, Mbada CE, Olaoye MI, Odole AC, Dada O. The Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation for People With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 24;8(6):e15375. doi: 10.2196/15375.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32357128 (View on PubMed)

Louw A, Diener I, Butler DS, Puentedura EJ. The effect of neuroscience education on pain, disability, anxiety, and stress in chronic musculoskeletal pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;92(12):2041-56. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.198.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22133255 (View on PubMed)

Louw A, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ, Diener I. The efficacy of pain neuroscience education on musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016 Jul;32(5):332-55. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1194646. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27351541 (View on PubMed)

Moseley L. Combined physiotherapy and education is efficacious for chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(4):297-302. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60169-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12443524 (View on PubMed)

Palacin-Marin F, Esteban-Moreno B, Olea N, Herrera-Viedma E, Arroyo-Morales M. Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):947-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318281a36c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23238489 (View on PubMed)

Bodes Pardo G, Lluch Girbes E, Roussel NA, Gallego Izquierdo T, Jimenez Penick V, Pecos Martin D. Pain Neurophysiology Education and Therapeutic Exercise for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29138049 (View on PubMed)

Saracoglu I, Arik MI, Afsar E, Gokpinar HH. The effectiveness of pain neuroscience education combined with manual therapy and home exercise for chronic low back pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Jul;38(7):868-878. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1809046. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32812478 (View on PubMed)

Truter P, Russell T, Fary R. The validity of physical therapy assessment of low back pain via telerehabilitation in a clinical setting. Telemed J E Health. 2014 Feb;20(2):161-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0088. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24283249 (View on PubMed)

Turolla A, Rossettini G, Viceconti A, Palese A, Geri T. Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is Telerehabilitation the Answer? Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 12;100(8):1260-1264. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa093. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32386218 (View on PubMed)

Wood L, Hendrick PA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pain neuroscience education for chronic low back pain: Short-and long-term outcomes of pain and disability. Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb;23(2):234-249. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1314. Epub 2018 Oct 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30178503 (View on PubMed)

Tahran O, Ersoz Huseyinsinoglu B, Yolcu G, Karadag Saygi E, Yeldan I. Comparing face-to-face and internet-based basic body awareness therapy for fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Sep;47(19):4987-4998. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2465597. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39970076 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0366

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Two Different Fascial Treatments
NCT06715969 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA