Effect of the Dry Needling and Kinesio Taping in Management of Mechanical Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT04976582

Last Updated: 2021-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-31

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Low back pain (LBP) is an extremely common problem that most people experience at some point in their life. It is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world. In India, occurrence of LBP is also alarming. Nearly 60% of the population has significant back pain at some time in their life. In Brazil, spinal pain (cervical, thoracic and lumbar) was considered the second most prevalent complaint, affecting approximately 13.5% of the population. It is estimated that globally 39% of the population will have at least one episode of back pain throughout their lives. In episodes of pain greater than 12 weeks (classified as chronic lower back pain), the prognosis is unfavorable and is highly associated with high treatment costs and work absenteeism.

Non-specific low back pain" \[NSLBP\] is defined as, low back pain that is not attributable to a recognizable or known specific pathology - bone disorder in the spine \[fracture\], radicular nerve compression, slipped intervertebral disk, stenosis in lumbar spine, inflammatory disorder of spine \[ankylosing spondylitis\], cauda equine syndrome, congenital back disorder, infection in the spine \[discitis\], tumour in lumbar area, osteoporosis, meningitis, Cancer, HIV, autoimmune disorder \[RA\].

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

HYPOTHESIS:

Null hypothesis: There is significant effects of dry needling with conventional physiotherapy treatment as compared to Kinesio Taping with conventional physiotherapy treatment.

Alternate hypothesis: There is no significant effects of dry needling with conventional physiotherapy treatment as compared to Kinesio Taping with conventional physiotherapy treatment.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study is:

* To determine the effects of dry needling in management of mechanical low back pain.
* To determine the effects of kinesio taping in management of mechanical low back pain.
* To determine the quality of life in patient with mechanical low back pain.
* To determine the varying degree of disability measure in patient with mechanical low back pain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

3.1. Study Design Study will be a randomized control trial (RCT).

3.2. Settings The study will be conducted in the Rawal General and Dental Hospital Islamabad and Al-Nafees hospital Islamabad.

3.3. Duration of Study The duration of study will be completed in 04 months after approval of synopsis.

3.4. Sample Size Thirty patients will be enrolled in the study. Patients will be divided into groups i.e; 15 patients in each group

3.5. Sampling Technique Non probability convenient sampling. 3.6. Assessment: A pre-intervention assessment will be performed to each participant before they will be randomly assigned to kinesio taping group or dry needling group with physical therapy intervention and outcome measures will be recorded before the intervention i.e; baseline assessment ,after 2 weeks of intervention and after four weeks of treatment. After treatment, patients will be performed post-intervention assessment.

3.7. INTERVENTION: Participants will be divided into two groups Group 1: control group in which kinesiotaping with conventional physical therapy treatment (modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.

Group 2: experimental group in which dry needling with conventional physical therapy treatment modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.

3.8. Treatment plan: There will be a 4 weeks treatment plan consisting of 12 sessions. On each week 3 sessions will be conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be divided into two groups Group 1: control group in which kinesiotaping with conventional physical therapy treatment (modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.

Group 2: experimental group in which dry needling with conventional physical therapy treatment modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Researcher and participants both are familiar with the procedure of interventions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

interventional group

experimental group in which dry needling with conventional physical therapy treatment modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dry needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.

control group

control group in which kinesiotaping with conventional physical therapy treatment (modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dry needle

modalities including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); electrical muscle stimulation (EMS); and interferential current (IFC). Physical agents including ultrasound, hot packs, and cold packs. Exercise including McKenzie exercises) will be administered.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Exercise including McKenzie exercises

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with age of 18 and above with non-specific chronic low back pain.
* Back pain of mechanical origin, apparently without a defined cause, for at least 12 weeks duration.
* Participants had not had any physical therapy treatment in the past six months and had never used Kinesio Taping and dry needling technique.
* Being asymptomatic, latent MTrPs in the muscle of lumbar region (pain during examination).
* The absence of skin allergies, Palpable taut bands (if muscle accessible).
* Recognition of usual local pain suffered by the patient pressing on the sensitive nodule on the taut bands (focally). (identification of active MTPs).
* Painful restriction of the full range of motion on passive stretching.
* The consent to physical examination, dry needling and kinesio taping application.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Severe injury in the last 12 months.

* Previous spinal surgical intervention, neurological diseases or musculoskeletal dis-orders, pharmacological treatment at present.
* infection, open wound, rash, decreased blood circulation in the treatment area
* A pacemaker, or epilepsy, presence of skin diseases and pregnancy
* Serious spinal pathologies such as a tumor, an inflammatory disease or former fracture of L1-S1, symptoms of spinal stenosis, disc protrusion or nerve root compromise and degeneration established in more than two levels
* Subjects who had used or had prior knowledge of the Kinesio Taping and dry needling method.
* generalized chronic pain, fibromyalgia, clinical sign of radiculopathy and peripheral nervous system diseases
* spondylolysis with or without spondylolisthesis, arthritis or osteoporosis and Congenital or acquired deformity
* ongoing psychiatric or somatic disease that excluded either one or both treatment alternatives
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr.Adeela Asad

PRINICIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adeela Asad, m.phil

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rawal Institue of Health Sciences Islamabad

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adeela Asad

Islamabad, Federal Capital, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Adeela Asad, m.phil

Role: CONTACT

03165184758

Asma Irshad, m.phil

Role: CONTACT

03345339123

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Adeela Asad, m.phil

Role: primary

03165184758

Asima Irshad, ph.d

Role: backup

03345339123

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

not applicale

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.