Compare Electrodry Needlig and Dry Needling in Mechanical Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT06407687

Last Updated: 2024-12-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-15

Study Completion Date

2024-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mechanical low back pain (LBP) generally results from an acute traumatic event, but it may also be caused by cumulative trauma. The severity of an acute traumatic event varies widely, from twisting one's back to being involved in a motor vehicle collision. Mechanical LBP due to cumulative trauma tends to occur more commonly in the workplace and Quadratus Lumborum injury plays an important role in causing MLBP. The aim of this study is To compare the effects of Electrical Dry Needling and Dry Needling on pain, endurance and range of motion in patients with Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A Randomized Clinical Trial will be conducted at Ali Afzal Shah Dispensary and Inam ul Haq Clinic Lahore through consecutive sampling technique on 40 patients which will be allocated using simple random sampling and patients will be divided in Group A and B. Group A will receive Electrical Dry Needling along with conventional physiotherapy. The parameters for Electro dry needling will be needles of 30×0.25 mm, 50×0.25 mm sizes Frequency 80-100 Hz, Duration 10-30 minutes and intensity as tolerated 1 session per week along with 5 day conventional physiotherapy a week for 4 weeks. Group 2 will receive Dry Needling along with conventional Physiotherapy in which parameters will be dry needles will be 30×0.25 and 50×0.25 mm sizes once per week and 5 days of conventional Physiotherapy per week for 4 weeks. Data will be analyzed during SPSS software version 25. After assessing normality of data by Shapiro-Wilk test, it will be decided either parametric or non-parametric test will be used within a group or between two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Dry Needling Endurance pain range of motion Quadratus Lumborum Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electric dry needling

Group A will receive Electrical Dry Needling along with conventional physiotherapy. The parameters for Electro dry needling will be needles of 30×0.25 mm, 50×0.25 mm sizes Frequency 80-100 Hz, Duration 10-30 minutes and intensity as tolerated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electro Dry Needlig

Intervention Type DEVICE

Electro Dry Needling is a modified form of dry needling which utilises an electro-stimulation unit connected via cables to fine filament needles. The combination of dry needling with electro-stimulation often prolongs the pain relief effect by blocking nerve pathways and preventing pain signals from travelling to the brain.

Dry needling

Group B will receive Dry Needling along with conventional Physiotherapy in which parameters will be dry needles will be 30×0.25 and 50×0.25 mm sizes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dry needling

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dry needling is a technique that acupuncturists, physical therapists and other trained healthcare providers use to treat musculoskeletal pain and movement issues.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electro Dry Needlig

Electro Dry Needling is a modified form of dry needling which utilises an electro-stimulation unit connected via cables to fine filament needles. The combination of dry needling with electro-stimulation often prolongs the pain relief effect by blocking nerve pathways and preventing pain signals from travelling to the brain.

Intervention Type DEVICE

dry needling

Dry needling is a technique that acupuncturists, physical therapists and other trained healthcare providers use to treat musculoskeletal pain and movement issues.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 25 to 45 years.
* Male and females both included.
* Muscle hypersensitivity on palpation
* Deep aching pain in sides of the lower back.
* Positive side-bridge test (Right \< 83.2 sec and Left \< 81.5 sec)
* Positive Simon's criteria for Quadratus Lumborum
* Patients with NPRS \<7
* ODI score of \< 40
* Decreased Lumber Side flexion and extension ROM
* Positive apperent Leg Length Discrepancy with more than 2 cm
* Negative Laslet's criteria for sacroiliac dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria

* People with real leg length discrepancy
* People with any other medical condition Including Lumbar fracture, Spondylolisthesis, Ankylosing Spondylysis, Rheumatoid Arthritis. All these conditions will be ruled out with carefully history and examination.
* People taking any other form of treatment including corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or analgesics.
* People with previous history of surgical treatment for Lumbar spine. o People with neurological deficits or systemic illness
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rabiya Noor, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ali Afzal Shah Dispensary

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Borenstein D. Mechanical low back pain--a rheumatologist's view. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Nov;9(11):643-53. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.133. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24018549 (View on PubMed)

Trompeter K, Fett D, Platen P. Prevalence of Back Pain in Sports: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Sports Med. 2017 Jun;47(6):1183-1207. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0645-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28035587 (View on PubMed)

Wong AYL, Karppinen J, Samartzis D. Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017 Apr 18;12:14. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0121-3. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28435906 (View on PubMed)

Pandey E, Kumar N, Das SJPOTJ. Effect of stretching on shortened quadratus lumborum muscle in non specific low back pain. 2018;11(2):80-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Will JS, Bury DC, Miller JA. Mechanical Low Back Pain. Am Fam Physician. 2018 Oct 1;98(7):421-428.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30252425 (View on PubMed)

MHMD H, Choudhury M, Mojumder M. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TREATMENT OF CHRONIC BACKACHE BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL METHOD AND TRIGGER POINT INJECTIONS (TPI).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Bryner P, HSR GD. Unilaterol bock poin: ci cose series of quodroitus lumborum. 1996.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Grover C, Christoffersen K, Clark L, Close R, Layhe S. Atraumatic Back Pain Due to Quadratus Lumborum Spasm Treated by Physical Therapy with Manual Trigger Point Therapy in the Emergency Department. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019 May 29;3(3):259-261. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2019.4.42788. eCollection 2019 Aug.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31404175 (View on PubMed)

Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Dommerholt JJTpdnae, approach c-b. Basic concepts of myofascial trigger points (TrPs). 2013:3-19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

de Franca GG, Levine LJ. The quadratus lumborum and low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Feb;14(2):142-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1826922 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/RCR & AHS/23/0183

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id