Computer-based Tutorial as Supportive Means to Enhance the Informed Consent Process for Cataract Surgery

NCT ID: NCT04975126

Last Updated: 2021-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-09

Study Completion Date

2017-03-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess whether a computer-based tutorial as supportive means enhances quality and efficiency of the informed consent process for cataract surgery focussing on the patients' attitude before and after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Informing the patient and obtaining informed consent is one of the major duties physicians perform before starting a medical treatment. The requirements concerning the informed consent process are high. The amount of information needed to be explained to the patient is growing, as procedures get more complex and the number of treatment options increase.

The CatInfo tool is a computer-based tutorial about cataract and cataract surgery run on a handheld device with headphones and presented in an audio-visual fashion. The patient gives feedback after each chapter using a traffic light system to ensure that the content has been understood (green - content understood, ready to continue; yellow - questions that require discussion with the physician and red - repetition of the module required). A printout that summarizes what the patient has selected after each chapter immediately tells the physician which topics have been poorly understood or were unclear.

It has been shown in a randomized triple-masked study that patients using the CatInfo tool were significantly better informed than patients only having a face-to-face interview. Satisfaction with the tool was high. This present study has the goal to assess the patients' attitude before and after surgery using validated questionnaires (decisional conflict scale, decision regret scale) as well as knowledge. Patients scheduled for their first eye cataract surgery are randomly allocated to two groups, receiving standard face-to-face informed consent (control group) or additionally using the interactive CatInfo tool (study group). Scores between the groups are compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CatInfo tool + Face-to-face discussion with physician

audio-visual presentation (CatInfo tool) before face-to-face informed-consent discussion with the physician

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CatInfo tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Presentation about cataract surgery

Face-to-face discussion with physician only

face-to-face informed-consent discussion with the physician only

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CatInfo tool

Presentation about cataract surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cataract
* Age 18 and older
* First eye to be operated
* No previous ophthalmic surgery
* written informed consent to participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Visual acuity of less than 0.1 Snellen in the worse eye
* Severe hearing loss
* Inability to use touch screen device (e.g. severe tremor, etc.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oliver Findl, MD, MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular surgery (VIROS), Vienna, Austria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS)

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ullrich M, Findl O, Kefer K, Doller B, Varsits R, Hienert J, Hirnschall N. An evaluation of the efficacy of a supplemental computer-based tutorial to enhance the informed consent process for cataract surgery: an exploratory randomized clinical study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 11;22(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02652-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36368980 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CatInfo

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.