High Resolution Immersion Ultrasound for iIOL Power Calculation
NCT ID: NCT03749486
Last Updated: 2018-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-01
2020-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: Low Fluidic EasyTip 2.2mm vs. High Fluidic EasyTip 2.2mm
NCT01936714
Posterior Capsule Opacification After Lens Capsule Polishing
NCT03857412
Protecting the Corneal Endothelium During Cataract Surgery Using the Anterior Capsule
NCT03855293
Outcomes of Phacoemulsification With Torsional Ultrasound
NCT01010490
Ultrasonic System for Cataract Characterization and Optimal Phacoemulsification Energy Evaluation
NCT04461912
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although immersion ultrasound has been improved significantly and novel high resolution ultrasound devices are available, the drawback of this technique is that measurement s take longer compared to optical biometry. The advantage of immersion ultrasound is that structures behind the iris are visible, whereas in optical biometry only structures within the pupil are visible.
Immersion ultrasound as well optical biometry can be used to calculate the needed power of an intraocular lens (IOL) to achieve the aimed post-operative refraction. Although IOL power calculation improved within the last decades, refractive surprises occur, especially in cases with very short eyes.
The estimation of the post-operative IOL position and therefore the estimated anterior chamber depth (ACD) is presently the main source of error (35% to 42%) in IOL power calculation and therefore for the refractive outcome of the patients after cataract surgery. Early IOL power calculation formulae, such as the Binkhorst I formula, used a fixed ACD value to predict the position of the IOL, but the refractive results were not appropriate because the post-operative position of the IOL varied significantly between patients. Later observations showed a correlation between the axial eye length and the post-operative ACD (more myopic eyes showed a larger ACD post-operatively). These correlations were taken into account in later developed formulas (such as the Binkhorst II formula). Olsen et al. measured the post-operative ACD and substituted the predicted post-operative ACD with the true, post-operative ACD in each case. The result after correcting the IOL position was a highly accurate IOL power calculation, where no fudge factors were needed. Presently the pre-operatively measured ACD is taken into account for several IOL power calculation formulas, such as the Haigis formula, the Holladay II formula and the Olsen formula. However, this new generation of formulas use the pre-operative ACD, without considering the thickness of the crystalline lens. The ACD is measured as the distance between the anterior surface of the cornea (anatomically speaking this should be the posterior surface of the cornea, but in an optical context, as in IOL power calculations, the anterior surface is used) and the anterior surface of the crystalline lens . Therefore the thickness of the crystalline lens has a significant impact on the predicted post-operative position of the IOL. This parameter was first taken into account by Olsen and later modified by Norrby.
It should be mentioned that IOL power calculations developed from theoretical calculations based on Gaussian optics to regression formulas, such as the SRK formula that uses retrospective data of a large number of patients. All these findings suggest that proper measurements not only of the dimensions of the crystalline lens but also of the lens capsule after removing the crystalline lens are necessary to improve IOL power calculation.
A prototype of a combination of an anterior segment OCT (VISANTE; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) and an operating microscope (OPMI 200; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) was introduced that allowed measurements of the crystalline lens as well as the lens capsule itself after removing the crystalline lens of cataract patients intraoperatively. This device uses OCT technology to create high resolution B-scans (=images) of the anterior segment of the eye. The OCT was shown to be highly reproducible for ACD measurements pre-operatively and small changes of the IOL/crystalline lens can be detected.
This prototype set-up was used in a previous study published in the journal "Investigative Ophthalmology \& Visual Science". It was shown that intra-operative measurements of the anterior lens capsule were a better predictor for the post-operative lens position than other factors and could improve the refractive outcome theoretically. Furthermore it was shown that intra-operatively measured anterior chamber depth is useful to predict refractive outcome using fourth-generation formulae. A further study aimed to observe, whether the postoperative refractive outcome could be improved theoretically by using both pre- and intra-operative measurements for retrospective IOL power calculation with new eye models.
In a recent study a high resolution swept-source OCT was used to perform the measurements and results were very promising (DIATHLAS; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany).
However, disadvantage of swept-source OCT technology is that the measured area is only within the pupil, but structures behind the iris cannot be visualised.
Most recent findings suggest that measuring the equator of the lens capsule and the cilliary body could improve IOL power calculation.
One CE marked device that allows measurements behind the iris is the ArcScan Insight 100 scanner. This immersion ultrasound device is a precision high frequency device for imaging and biometry of the eye. A 20-60 MHz transducer scans the eye although its curvature approximates the anterior ocular surface. During this process the device produces images with 1 micron resolution of the cornea or the anterior segment. In addition, measurements can also be made of the anatomic structures comprising the anterior of the eye such as anterior chamber depth, angle-to-angle width, and sulcus-to-sulcus width, and pathologic structures, such as solid masses and cysts.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ArcScan
High resolution immersion ultrasound measurement before Cataract surgery
Cataract surgery
Cataract surgery will be done following ArcScan measurement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cataract surgery
Cataract surgery will be done following ArcScan measurement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 21 and older
* Able to understand the patient information
* Willing to follow the instructions and attend all follow-up visits
* Willing to sign informed consent prior to surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous ocular surgeries on the study eye
* Patients who are not able to cooperate, with eccentric fixation or insufficient ability to fixate (tremor, nystagmus)
* Pregnant or lactating women (pregnancy testing will be performed preoperatively on women of reproductive age)
21 Years
105 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS)
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ArcScan
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.