Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the GCPS 2.0.(Graded Chronic Pain Scale 2.0)

NCT ID: NCT04969458

Last Updated: 2021-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-22

Study Completion Date

2020-11-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was designed to conduct Turkish adaptation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability study of Graded Chronic Pain Scale 2.0 in order to use it for Turkish people with Chronic Pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The GCPS 2.0 is an eight-item scale that evaluates the severity of chronic pain, the presence of persistent pain due to pain days, and the degree of disability due to pain. It is easy, simple, useful and multidimensional. 80 volunteer participants who had chronic low back pain were studied.The data collection tools used in this study were; Clinic and Demographic Evaluation Form, Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index, Patterns of Activity Measure Pain, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety, and Depression Scale, and Graded Chronic Pain Scale 2.0. In this study, the forms were sent by e-mail. The Snowball sampling method was used in the data collection process.The stages of the Beaton Protocol were followed in the translation of the scale. Validity was evaluated with the Face, Content, and Construct validity analyses. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied to determine the construct validity of the Turkish version of the scale. Reliability was evaluated with the test-retest method, the parallel forms method, and the internal consistency. Ten days after completing the scale, 30 participants filled out the scale again for the Test-retest method. One of the scales we used for the parallel forms method was RMDQ and the other was ODI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain Scale Reliability Validity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

participants

The study included individuals whose native language is Turkish, who are over the age of 18 and under the age 70, diagnosed with chronic low back pain, without Psychiatric disorder, Cognitive impairment, Dementia, or Alzheimer's and who want to participate in the study.

survey application

Intervention Type OTHER

Data collection tools used in the study;

* Clinic and Demographic Evaluation Form
* Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI)
* Patterns of Activity Measure Pain (POAM-P)
* Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
* Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
* Graded Chronic Pain Scale Version 2.0 (GCPS 2.0)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

survey application

Data collection tools used in the study;

* Clinic and Demographic Evaluation Form
* Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI)
* Patterns of Activity Measure Pain (POAM-P)
* Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
* Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
* Graded Chronic Pain Scale Version 2.0 (GCPS 2.0)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Participants were Turkish speakers and volunteer participants aged 18 years and over and under 70 years of age who had recurrent or persistent chronic LBP for 6 months or more.The following participants with CLBP diagnosed by a physician were included in the study. These;

* Disc herniations
* Mechanical back pain
* Lumbar strain
* Spondylolisthesis
* Degenerative disc disease
* Muscle imbalance
* Lumbago
* A trigger point in the back muscles

Exclusion Criteria

* Having a history of illness such as Psychiatric disorder, Cognitive impairment, Dementia, or Alzheimer's
* Low back pain that needs immediate treatment (neoplasm, cauda equina syndrome, infection, fracture)
* Inflammatory low back pain
* Low back pain due to a vascular cause
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yeditepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yeditepe University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

123456789

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.