Dry Needling Versus Conservative Treatment in the Rectus Femoris Muscle Approach.

NCT ID: NCT04968236

Last Updated: 2024-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-30

Study Completion Date

2024-02-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In recent years, dry needling techniques have become widespread in the field of musculoskeletal pain treatment. Specifically, the management of myofascial trigger points has been the focus of these techniques.

One of the objectives has been to improve the flexibility of those muscles that, due to the presence of myofascial trigger points, had a decrease in this parameter.

This study aims to determine whether the application of a dry needling technique is more effective than analytical stretching of the muscle.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis of the study Deep dry needling of latent trigger points of the rectus femoris produces greater effects on flexibility, strength and pain than superficial dry needling or stretching.

\- Overall objective: To compare the differences that occur in flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure after the application of deep dry needling, superficial dry needling and stretching on latent trigger points of the rectus femoris.

\- Specific objectives To determine the changes produced by deep dry needling on flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure.

To determine the changes produced by superficial dry needling on flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure.

To determine the changes in flexibility, strength and pain threshold to pressure produced by conventional assisted stretching.

To check if the changes remain after 7 days of the application of the techniques.

To assess the inter-rater reliability of the Goniometer APP in the study sample.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Needling Stretch Rectus Femoris Muscle

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Deep dry needling

With the subject lying supine, we will first locate a latent myofascial trigger point in the rectus femoris muscle.Subsequently, we will apply a deep dry needling technique to the latent trigger point and make 10-12 incisions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Deep Dry Needling

Intervention Type OTHER

In-and-out into different directions technique to encounter sensitive spots in an MTrP region.

Superficial dry needling

With the subject lying supine, we will first locate a latent myofascial trigger point in the rectus femoris muscle.Subsequently, we will apply a superficial dry needling technique to the latent trigger point. Once the needle is placed in the subcutaneous cellular tissue, we manipulate the needle by twisting it until an unpleasant response is provoked. We keep the needle for 5 minutes

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Superficial Dry Needling

Intervention Type OTHER

This technique involves inserting a needle at a depth that is into the subcutaneous tissue and may be combined with manipulation of the needle while in situ.

Passive muscle stretching

With the patient positioned in the supine position, the pelvis stabilized with a strap and the lower extremity where we are going to apply the rectus femoris muscle stretch placed outside the table, we perform a passive stretching technique, increasing hip extension and knee flexion until the patient feels the tension. The position is held for 60 seconds.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

passive stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

Type of stretching in which you stay in one position for a set time. In this case, hip extension and knee flexion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Deep Dry Needling

In-and-out into different directions technique to encounter sensitive spots in an MTrP region.

Intervention Type OTHER

Superficial Dry Needling

This technique involves inserting a needle at a depth that is into the subcutaneous tissue and may be combined with manipulation of the needle while in situ.

Intervention Type OTHER

passive stretching

Type of stretching in which you stay in one position for a set time. In this case, hip extension and knee flexion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women between 18 and 65 years old.
2. To have at least 70º of knee flexion.
3. Be aware of and accept the study criteria (informed consent).
4. Healthy subjects, without previous hip or knee pathology or involved musculature.

Exclusion Criteria

1. To have pain.
2. Having pain in the quadriceps or hip at the time of the study.
3. Currently following physiotherapy or analgesic treatment.
4. Belenophobia (fear of needles).
5. Recent surgery or trauma in the area.
6. Pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alcala

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centro Investigación Fisioterapia y Dolor

Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Physiotherapy and Pain Institute

Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

06/2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.