A Comparison of Prolonged Exposure Therapy, Pharmacotherapy, and Their Combination for PTSD

NCT ID: NCT04961190

Last Updated: 2026-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

302 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-25

Study Completion Date

2026-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) remains a salient and debilitating problem, in the general population and for military veterans in particular. Several psychological and pharmacological treatments for PTSD have evidence to support their efficacy. However, the lack of comparative effectiveness data for PTSD treatments remains a major gap in the literature, which limits conclusions that can be drawn about which of these treatments work best. The current study will compare the effectiveness of PTSD treatments with the strongest evidentiary support - Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy and pharmacotherapy with paroxetine or venlafaxine - as well as the combination of these two treatments. A randomized trial will be conducted with a large, diverse sample of veterans with PTSD (N = 300) recruited from 6 VA Medical Centers throughout the US. Participants will complete baseline assessments, followed by an active treatment phase (involving up to 14 sessions of PE and/or medication management) with mid (7 week) and posttreatment (14 week) assessments, and follow-up assessments at 27 and 40 weeks. Study outcomes will include PTSD severity, depression, quality of life and functioning, assessed via clinical ratings and self-report measures. Further, a range of demographic and clinically relevant variables (e.g., trauma type/number, resilience) will be collected at baseline and examined as potential predictors or moderators of treatment response, addressing another gap in the PTSD treatment literature. These data will be used to develop algorithms from predicting the optimal treatment for individual patients (i.e., "personalized advantage indices"; PAIs). Effectiveness of the treatments will be compared using multilevel modeling. PAIs will be developed by conducting bootstrapped analyses to select variables that predict or moderate outcomes (clinician rated PTSD severity at Week 14), followed by jacknife analyses to determine the magnitude of the predicted difference (representing an individual's "predicted advantage" of one treatment over the others).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) remains a salient and debilitating problem, in the general population and for military veterans in particular. Several psychological and pharmacological treatments for PTSD have evidence to support their efficacy. However, the lack of comparative effectiveness trials for PTSD treatments remains a major gap in the literature, which limits conclusions that can be drawn about which of these treatments work best. In particular, trials directly comparing efficacious psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies are needed to inform clinical decision making for patients and providers. To address this gap, the proposed study will aim to compare the effectiveness of PTSD treatments with the strongest evidentiary support - Prolonged Exposure (PE) therapy and pharmacotherapy with paroxetine or venlafaxine - as well as the combination of these two treatments. A randomized trial in proposed with a large, diverse sample of veterans with PTSD (N = 300) recruited from 6 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers throughout the US (in Philadelphia, Coatesville, Milwaukee, Dallas, San Diego, and Palo Alto). Treatments conditions will reflect "real world" practice in these settings, and minimal exclusion criteria related to safety will be adopted, to maximize external validity. Participants will be permitted to complete treatment sessions in person or via telehealth (based on evidence for equivalent outcomes across these modalities), to maximize patient access, recruitment, and generalizability. Participants will complete baseline assessments, followed by 14 weeks of active treatment (involving up to 14 sessions of PE and/or medication management) with mid and posttreatment assessments after 7 and 14 weeks respectively, and then follow-up assessments at 27 and 40 weeks. Primary outcomes will include PTSD severity, depression symptoms, quality of life and functioning, assessed via clinical ratings and self-report measures. Further, a range of demographic and clinically relevant variables (e.g., trauma type/number, physiological arousal) will be collected at baseline and examined as potential predictors or moderators of treatment response, addressing another key gap in the PTSD treatment literature. Specifically, these data will be used to develop algorithms from predicting the optimal treatment for individual patients (i.e., "personalized advantage indices"; PAIs), a statistical approach which has advanced the depression treatment literature but has only been used in a limited capacity in PTSD research. The project will include an Advisory Board composed of clinician and patient representatives, in order to obtain stakeholder feedback at every stage of the study (from implementation to dissemination of findings). The effectiveness of the treatments will be compared using multilevel modeling. PAIs will be developed by conducting bootstrapped analyses to select variables that predict or moderate outcomes (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale severity ratings at Week 14), followed by leave-one-out cross-validation (i.e., jackknife) analyses to determine the magnitude of the predicted difference that results in each analysis representing that individuals "predicted advantage" (of one treatment over the others). We hypothesize that individuals who receive PE will have better outcomes than those who receive pharmacotherapy alone, based on existing data (e.g., cross study effect size comparisons), but have planned the study and sample to maximize statistical power in all analyses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prolonged Exposure Therapy

8-14 sessions of psychotherapy, each lasting 60-90 minutes, focused on imaginal exposure to trauma memories and in vivo exposure to trauma reminders

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prolonged Exposure Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A form of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy focused on imaginal exposure to trauma memories and in vivo exposure to trauma reminders

Pharmacotherapy

20-60mg of paroxetine daily, or 75-300mg of venlafaxine XR daily

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pharmacotherapy with paroxetine or venlafaxine XR

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard dosing with paroxetine, a selectiveserotonin reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved to treat PTSD and depression, or venlafaxine extended-release, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved to treat anxiety and depression

Combined treatment (Prolonged Exposure and Pharmacotherapy)

8-14 sessions of psychotherapy, each lasting 60-90 minutes, focused on imaginal exposure to trauma memories and in vivo exposure to trauma reminders AND 20-60mg of paroxetine daily, or 75-300mg of venlafaxine XR daily

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prolonged Exposure Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A form of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy focused on imaginal exposure to trauma memories and in vivo exposure to trauma reminders

Pharmacotherapy with paroxetine or venlafaxine XR

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard dosing with paroxetine, a selectiveserotonin reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved to treat PTSD and depression, or venlafaxine extended-release, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved to treat anxiety and depression

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prolonged Exposure Therapy

A form of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy focused on imaginal exposure to trauma memories and in vivo exposure to trauma reminders

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Pharmacotherapy with paroxetine or venlafaxine XR

Standard dosing with paroxetine, a selectiveserotonin reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved to treat PTSD and depression, or venlafaxine extended-release, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that is FDA approved to treat anxiety and depression

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Pharmacotherapy with Paxil or Effexor XR

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* DSM-5 diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
* military veteran
* fluent in English
* willing to participate in PE, pharmacotherapy, or both
* capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* suicidal ideation with intent and/or plan, or suicidal behavior in the past month
* active psychosis
* history of manic episode(s)
* a failed trial of Prolonged Exposure therapy or paroxetine and venlafaxine XR
* ongoing medical conditions or treatments that would contraindicate initiating these treatments (e.g., medications that have potential interactions with paroxetine and venlafaxine such as MAO inhibitors)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

San Diego Veterans Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Palo Alto Health Care System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Birmingham VA Health Care System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Coatesville VA Medical Center

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Milwaukee VA Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

North Texas Veterans Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham VA Healthcare System

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

VA Palo Alto Healthcare System

Menlo Park, California, United States

Site Status

VA San Diego Healthcare System

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Coatesville VA Medicial Center

Coatesville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

VA North Texas Healthcare System

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee VA Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bredemeier K, Larsen S, Shivakumar G, Grubbs K, McLean C, Tress C, Rosenfield D, DeRubeis R, Xu C, Foa E, Morland L, Pai A, Tsao C, Crawford J, Weitz E, Mayinja L, Feler B, Wachsman T, Lupo M, Hooper V, Cook R, Thase M. A comparison of prolonged exposure therapy, pharmacotherapy, and their combination for PTSD: What works best and for whom; study protocol for a randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106850. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106850. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35842108 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CER-2020C1-19382

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1620949-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.