Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-01
2020-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This was a parallel randomised controlled trial in patients scheduled for planned sleeve gastrectomy in Barlicki University Hospital, Lodz, Poland. Randomization and allocation to trial group were carried out by drawing envelopes by independent observer before a procedure. Randomized and recruited participants were 76 adults (typical intubation n= 36, face-to-face intubation n=40). Main outcome was a time of intubation using Airtraq video laryngoscope measured by independent assistant.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Airtraq in Class 2-3 Obese and Nonobese Men During Intubation: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
NCT05927519
Comparative Effectiveness of Intubating Devices in the Morbidly Obese
NCT01114945
Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Obese Patients: a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT07004621
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Obese Patients
NCT03106974
Tracheal Intubation of Morbidly Obese Patients. GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscopy
NCT00917033
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods : Patients admitted to hospital for elective sleeve gastrectomy procedure will be included in the study protocol. Before induction of anaesthesia the draw of the method will be held. The choice of method of intubation (inverse or typical) will be random.
1. All patients will be positioned with the elevation of the upper body about 30 degrees. The standard anesthesia monitoring involves electrocardiogram, pulsoxymetry, non-invasive blood pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide.
2. Patients will be pre-oxygenated for 5 min. with 100% oxygen using facemask.
3. The induction of general anesthesia will be performed by the intravenous administration of 1-2 µg.kg-1 of fentanyl and 2-2,5 mg.kg-1 propofol.
4. After mask ventilation possibility is confirmed, rocuronium in a dose of 0,6 mg.kg-1 will be given.
5. After obtaining an optimal muscle relaxation (90 s.) patient will be intubated. In face-to-face method an anesthetist is standing in front of a patient. In typical intubation an anesthetist is standing behind the patient's head.
6. In case of prolonged face-to-face intubation (\>120 s) or 2 unsuccessful attempts, patients are supposed to be intubated in a traditional way with the same video laryngoscope.
7. General anesthesia will be continued with desflurane and a mixture of the oxygen and air, volume-controlled ventilation parameters will be adjusted to age and ideal body weight.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
face-to-face intubation
intubation approach from front of the patient
AirTraq videolaryngoscope
intubation of morbidly obese patient using Airtraq videolaryngoscope
standard position intubation
intubation approach from behind the head of the patient
AirTraq videolaryngoscope
intubation of morbidly obese patient using Airtraq videolaryngoscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AirTraq videolaryngoscope
intubation of morbidly obese patient using Airtraq videolaryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients qualified for planned sleeve gastrectomy.
3. Patients of I and II class of ASA scale.
4. Patients without history of difficult intubation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients of III, IV, V and VI class of ASA scale.
3. History of difficult intubation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Lodz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tomasz Gaszynski
professor of anaesthesia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tomasz Gaszynski
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Lodz, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arslan ZI, Alparslan V, Ozdal P, Toker K, Solak M. Face-to-face tracheal intubation in adult patients: a comparison of the Airtraq, Glidescope and Fastrach devices. J Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):893-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2052-6. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
Jeong H, Chae M, Seo H, Yi JW, Kang JM, Lee BJ. Face-to-face intubation using a lightwand in a patient with severe thoracolumbar kyphosis: a case report. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul 21;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0556-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RNN/62/20/KE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.