The Hug-up Test: A New, Sensitive Diagnostic Test for Supraspinatus Tears
NCT ID: NCT04954508
Last Updated: 2021-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-12-01
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Internal Rotation Resistance Test at Abduction and External Rotation
NCT04954170
The Pull Test To Determine Responders To Subacromial Injection In Patients With Shoulder Impingement
NCT02686671
Added Value of Sonoelastography in Assessment of Traumatic and Non Traumatic Supraspinatus Tendinopathy and Tear Compared with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT06803303
Comparison of the Accuracy of Telehealth Examination Versus Clinical Examination in the Detection of Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT03906630
Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Tool for Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT01242761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Between November 2012 and January 2014, 200 consecutive patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were prospectively evaluated preoperatively. The hug-up test, empty can (EC) test, full can (FC) test, Neer impingement sign, and Hawkins-Kennedy impingement sign were used and compared statistically for their accuracy in terms of supraspinatus tears, with arthroscopic findings as the gold standard. Muscle strength was precisely quantified using an electronic digital tensiometer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
P
patients suffering form shoulder pain and/or weakness or dislication
The hug-up test
It is a new physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
EC test
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
FC test
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
Neer impingement sign
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
Hawkins-Kennedy impingement sign
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
diagnostic arthroscopy
The arthroscopic operation involved complete inspection of the supraspinatus. Supraspinatus tears were categorized as fullthickness tears (FTTs), which were classified as small (≤1 cm), moderate (≤3 cm), large (≤5 cm), and massive (\>5 cm), on the basis of the largest dimension, and partial-thickness tears (PTTs), which were classified as bursal-sided, articular-sided,and intra-tendinous. Other combined diseases including acromioclavicular joint derangement, infraspinatus lesions, subscapularis lesions, superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, biceps disorders, and Bankart lesions were recorded as well to assess the specificity of the tests.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The hug-up test
It is a new physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
EC test
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
FC test
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
Neer impingement sign
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
Hawkins-Kennedy impingement sign
It is a traditional physical test used to detect supraspinatus tear
diagnostic arthroscopy
The arthroscopic operation involved complete inspection of the supraspinatus. Supraspinatus tears were categorized as fullthickness tears (FTTs), which were classified as small (≤1 cm), moderate (≤3 cm), large (≤5 cm), and massive (\>5 cm), on the basis of the largest dimension, and partial-thickness tears (PTTs), which were classified as bursal-sided, articular-sided,and intra-tendinous. Other combined diseases including acromioclavicular joint derangement, infraspinatus lesions, subscapularis lesions, superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, biceps disorders, and Bankart lesions were recorded as well to assess the specificity of the tests.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Third Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yulei Liu
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Peking University Third Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014156
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.