Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
180 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-07
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is standard procedure to inject bupivacaine immediately before injecting absolute alcohol, to theoretically prevent pain that may occur during and after the procedure. However, there are no data showing whether bupivacaine injection has any real influence on intra-procedural, immediate post-procedural, or long-term pain control. The injection of bupivacaine before the alcohol may have no effect, a synergistic effect, or an antagonistic effect, by diluting the alcohol, and reducing its neurolytic capacity. Inadvertent intravascular injection of bupivacaine may also cause irreversible cardiac arrhythmias and death.
The investigators therefore propose a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the exclusion of bupivacaine during EUS-guided CPN improves outcomes, or not.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) - Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis
NCT00974948
EUS Guided Neurolysis Celiac Block w/wo Bupivacaine in Patient Being Treated Palliatively for Pancreatic Cancer
NCT02682082
EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis for the Treatment of Abdominal Pain in Pancreatic Cancer
NCT03940027
Epidural Analgesia Use in Pancreatic Resections
NCT02681796
Rectus Sheath Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control Following Pancreatoduodenectomy
NCT06411795
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this context, one of the most important symptoms is pain because it often affects both quality of life and survival. 70 to 80 % of patients with pancreatic cancer have abdominal pain at the time of diagnosis. Adequate pain control is therefore an essential component of care in these patients. In the initial phase, the pain is visceral, but with disease progression, somatic pain may occur, especially due to the peri-pancreatic invasion of neural structures, such as the celiac plexus.
Standard analgesics such as acetaminophen are usually ineffective and the use and effectiveness of opioids is frequently limited by side effects such as nausea, constipation, somnolence, confusion or respiratory depression.
The celiac plexus is immediately adjacent to the gastric wall. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows EUS-guided trans gastric injection of neurolytic agents around the celiac plexus (celiac plexus neurolysis \[CPN\]). Under conscious sedation, the echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to inject a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery. The entire procedure takes approximately 5 minutes. Absolute alcohol causes the immediate destruction of the celiac plexus neurons, by precipitation of endoneural lipoproteins and mucoproteins.
The effectiveness of CPN, is well established. It is safe, produces significant pain reduction, significantly reduces narcotic requirements, and may even increase survival. The investigators were the first to publish a randomized, sham-controlled trial demonstrating the efficacy of EUS-CPN for pain due to pancreatic cancer, and authored the most recent published guidelines on the use of EUS-CPN.
Based on our experience in over 1000 neurolysis procedures, patients undergoing EUS-guided CPN may experience pain, acutely during alcohol injection, and sometimes post-procedure, for up to a few hours. (Unpublished observations) It is possible that the presence of pain during injection of alcohol indicates that the celiac plexus has been accurately targeted and may therefore portend better long-term pain control.
Currently, during the neurolysis procedure, it is standard procedure to inject bupivacaine immediately before injecting absolute alcohol, to theoretically prevent pain during and after the procedure.
The true value of bupivacaine during neurolysis has never been studied. There are no data showing whether bupivacaine injection has any real influence on intra-procedural, immediate post-procedural, or long-term pain control. The injection of bupivacaine before the alcohol may have no effect, a synergistic effect, or an antagonistic effect, by diluting the alcohol, and reducing its neurolytic capacity. Inadvertent intravascular injection of bupivacaine may also cause irreversible cardiac arrhythmias and death.
In other words, in the worst case scenario, the injection of bupivacaine may increase procedural risk, without any associated benefit in terms of pain reduction.
The EUS team at the CHUM stopped using bupivacaine during neurolysis approximately 2 years ago and has noticed no obvious difference in pain during the procedure or in the immediate post-procedure recovery period, no increase in complications, and a possible reduction in requests for repeat neurolysis - suggesting that neurolysis without bupivacaine may be more effective. (Unpublished observations)
The investigators therefore propose a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the exclusion of bupivacaine during EUS-guided CPN improves outcomes, or not.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EUS-CPN with bupivacaine
Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute alcohol 20 mL preceded by injection of 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%.
EUS-CPN with bupivacaine
Under conscious sedation, an echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to firstly inject bupivacaine and secondly a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery.
EUS-CPN without bupivacaine
Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis with absolute alcohol 20 mL only.
EUS-CPN without bupivacaine
Under conscious sedation, an echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to inject a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-CPN without bupivacaine
Under conscious sedation, an echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to inject a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery.
EUS-CPN with bupivacaine
Under conscious sedation, an echoendoscope is advanced into the stomach, just distal to the gastro-esophageal junction. The region of the celiac plexus is identified around the takeoff of the celiac artery from the aorta. Then, under real-time ultrasound guidance, a 19g needle is used to firstly inject bupivacaine and secondly a neurolytic agent such as absolute alcohol around the base of the celiac artery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Any level of abdominal or back pain considered to be potentially related to the mass:
1. New onset pain (\<3 months)
2. Constant
3. Centrally located
4. With or without irradiation to the back
5. No obvious other source of pain based on history and physical examination by the attending endosonographer
3. No possibility of surgical management
4. Signed, informed consent
5. Celiac axis accessible for bilateral neurolysis at EUS.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ANAND V SAHAI, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Esmail E, Paquin SC, Sahai AV. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) with vs without bupivacaine. Trials. 2023 Sep 8;24(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07487-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21.151
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.