Oxytocin vs Prostaglandins for Labor Induction of Women With an Unfavorable Cervix After 24h of Cervical Ripening
NCT ID: NCT04949633
Last Updated: 2025-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
1494 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-28
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study seeks to identify the most appropriate strategy for the management of women with an unfavorable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening, a strategy which would be associated with the lowest maternal and perinatal morbidity but also with the best maternal satisfaction. Because both strategies are practiced in France, the trial would compare: induction of labor with oxytocin and repeated cervical ripening. The aim is to show that repeating cervical ripening is an unnecessary procedure. And more specifically that oxytocin administration is not associated with a higher caesarean delivery rate and that it reduces the time to delivery in comparison with cervical ripening with prostaglandins.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Induction of Labor With Oxytocin: When Should Oxytocin be Held?
NCT00957593
A Randomized, Control Trial for Preinduction Cervical Ripening
NCT00393731
Oxytocin vs. Prostaglandin for Induction of Labor in Primiparas With Prelabor Rupture of Membrane and Low Bishop
NCT02801227
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon
NCT01139801
Up-Down Oxytocin Infusion
NCT00785395
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study seeks to identify the most appropriate strategy for the management of women with an unfavorable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening, a strategy which would be associated with the lowest maternal and perinatal morbidity but also with the best maternal satisfaction. Because both strategies are practiced in France, the trial would compare: induction of labor with oxytocin and repeated cervical ripening. The policy of induction of labor with oxytocin, being the simpler strategy, would be acceptable if it did not lead to a substantially proportion of women with caesarean deliveries compared with a second cervical ripening. This multicenter non inferiority randomized trial will recruit women with an unfavorable cervix (bishop score ≤ 6) after 24 hours of cervical ripening (pharmacological or mechanical) and randomize them to either induction of labor with oxytocin or to a second cervical ripening with prostaglandins. The aim is to show that repeating cervical ripening is an unnecessary procedure. And more specifically that oxytocin administration is not associated with a higher caesarean delivery rate and that it reduces the time to delivery in comparison with cervical ripening with prostaglandins.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Induction of labor
women randomized in the experimental group will be admitted to the labor ward to undergo induction of labor with intra-veinous oxytocin and early amniotomy. Oxytocin will be administered according to the French guidelines for induction of labor. Maximum oxytocin used should not exceed 10 UI.
Oxytocin
Induction of labor with oxytocin.
Second cervical ripening
women randomized in the control group will undergo a second cervical ripening lasting a maximum of 24 hours with either:
* Vaginal slow releasing system of dinoprostone PROPESS® which is inserted in the vagina, against the cervix and left in place during 24 hours.
* Oral misoprostol (ANGUSTA®) 25 µg every 2 hours, 8 times (maximum dosage should not exceed 200µg). Tablets will be given one at the time by midwives.
* Vaginal gel of dinoprostone (2 mg PROSTINE®) every 6 hours, maximum dose of 6 mg.
The choice of the cervical ripening agent will depend of the local protocol of the participating maternity unit. The choice between ANGUSTA®, PROPESS® and PROSTINE® will be made by investigators of each participating unit at the beginning of the trial.
At the end of the second cervical ripening procedure women not in labor will be transferred to the labor ward for induction of labor with oxytocin.
Prostaglandins
Second cervical ripening lasting a maximum of 24 hours
Oxytocin
Induction of labor with oxytocin.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prostaglandins
Second cervical ripening lasting a maximum of 24 hours
Oxytocin
Induction of labor with oxytocin.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ≥ 18 years old
* With a singleton cephalic pregnancy
* ≥37+0 weeks of gestation
* Gestational age estimated from the first trimester ultrasound (realized between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
* With a medical indication of labor with a previous pharmacological or mechanical cervical ripening of 24 hours
* Bishop score ≤ 6 at inclusion (unfavorable cervix)
* French health insurance policy holder
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior caesarean section or uterine scar
* Contra-indications to a vaginal delivery
* Foetus with suspected severe congenital abnormalities
* Pathological foetal heart rate
* Contra-indications to ANGUSTA® (oral misoprostol, cervical ripening agent)
* Contra-indications to PROPESS® (vaginal slow releasing system of dinoprostone, cervical ripening agent)
* Contra-indications to PROSTINE® (vaginal gel of dinoprostone, cervical ripening agent)
* Contra-indications for using oxytocin
* Woman in labor
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Tours
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Caroline DIGUISTO, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Angers
Angers, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Brest
Brest, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, Hospital St Joseph, Marseille
Marseille, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Nancy
Nancy, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Nantes
Nantes, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Orléans
Orléans, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, Port Royal Maternity Hospital, Paris
Paris, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Poitiers
Poitiers, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Saint Etienne
Saint-Etienne, , France
Gynaecology-obstetrics, University Hospital, Tours
Tours, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Guillaume LEGENDRE, MD-PhD
Role: primary
Jordan POZZY, MD
Role: primary
Charline BERTHOLDT, MD
Role: primary
Norbert WINER, MD-PhD
Role: primary
Floranne MEUNIER, MD
Role: primary
François GOFFINET, MD
Role: primary
Tiphaine BARJAT, MD
Role: primary
Franck PERROTIN, MD-PhD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
De Berti M, Le Gouge A, Monmousseau F, Gallot D, Sentilhes L, Winer N, Legendre G, Desbriere R, Girault A, Pozzi J, Gachon B, Barjat T, Perrotin F, Brunet-Houdard S, Diguisto C; Groupe de Recherche en Gynecologie Obstetrique. Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour Induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):e058282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058282.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-000989-15
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
DR200090
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.