Efficacy and Safety of Rapid Intermittent Correction Compared With Slow Continuous Correction in Patients With Severe Hypernatremia
NCT ID: NCT04949139
Last Updated: 2025-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
178 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-01
2025-02-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Rapid Intermittent Compared With Slow Continuous Correction in Severe Hyponatremia Patients
NCT02887469
Establishment of an Algorithm for a Clinical Classfication of Hypoosmolar Hyponatremia
NCT00541944
Mortality and Neurologic Outcomes in Rapid vs. Slow Hyponatremia Correction
NCT06675591
Efficacy and Safety of Bolus Comparing With Continuous Drip of 3% NaCl in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Hyponatremia.
NCT04561531
Variation in Natremia Using Two Different Maintenance Intravenous Fluids in Postsurgical Hospitalized Children
NCT01251770
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this prospective, randomized, open-labeled, multi-center, and investigator-initiated trial is to determine whether a rapid and intermittent bolus of electrolyte-free water in hypernatremia can increase the incidence of rapid decrease in sNa level and increase the survival time compared to the slow continuous administration method. A total of 166 patients with severe hypernatremia will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either intermittent bolus or slow continuous infusion of 5% dextrose water. The participants will be divided into three groups according to age and sex and will receive 5% dextrose water for 2 days at different correction rates. Serum sodium will be measured every 3 h from the beginning to 6 h, followed by every 6 h until 48 h. In addition, urine sodium and potassium levels will be measured at baseline and 24 h. The PP (Per Protocol) analysis will be applied to enrolled participants who is infused with 75-125% of total planned volume of 5% dextrose water.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rapid intermittent bolus group
A : males \< 65 ; B : females \< 65 or males ≥ 65 ; C : females ≥ 65 yrs
\<During the first 3 h\>
Primary treatment over 1h A: 5DW 8 B: 5DW 7 C: 5DW 6 mL/kg
If undercorrected, Repeat the 5DW amount infused during primary treatment after 3 h
\<At 3-24 h\> Modify protocol based on sNa at each time point (6/12/18/24 h)
Check U/S ratio at 0 h
* undercorrection \< 0.5: repeat the amount infused during primary treatment q 3 h
≥ 0.5: repeat the amount infused during primary treatment q 6 h
* target correction \< 0.5: repeat the amount infused during primary treatment q 6 h ≥ 0.5: stop the infusion
\<At 24-48 h\> Modify protocol based on sNa at each time point (30/36/42/48 h)
Check U/S ratio at 24 h
* undercorrection \< 0.5: repeat the amount infused during primary treatment q 3 h
≥ 0.5: repeat the amount infused during primary treatment q 6 h
* target correction \< 0.5: repeat the amount infused during primary treatment q 6 h ≥ 0.5: stop the infusion
Dextrose 5% in water
Reducing the sodium concentration
Slow continuous infusion group
Participants will be divided into three groups same as above
\<During the first 3 h\>
Primary treatment A: 5DW 1.8 B: 5DW 1.57 C: 5DW 1.35 mL/kg/h
Modify protocol as described below based on sNa measurement at 3 h
* undercorrection: maintain the infusion rate
* target correction: stop the infusion
\<At 3-24 h\> Modify protocol based on sNa measurement at each time point (6/12/18/24 h)
Check U/S ratio at 0 h
• undercorrection
\< 0.5: increase the infusion rate to twice that of the primary treatment
≥ 0.5: maintain the infusion rate
• target correction
\< 0.5: maintain the infusion rate
≥ 0.5: stop the infusion
\<At 24-48 h\> Modify protocol based on sNa measurement at each time point (30/36/42/48 h)
Check U/S ratio at 24 h
• undercorrection
\< 0.5: increase the infusion rate to twice that of the primary treatment
≥ 0.5: maintain the infusion rate
• target correction
\< 0.5: maintain the infusion rate
≥ 0.5: stop the infusion
Dextrose 5% in water
Reducing the sodium concentration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dextrose 5% in water
Reducing the sodium concentration
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Severe hypernatremia: glucose-corrected serum sodium ≥ 155 mmol/L
* Written consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Anuria or bilateral urinary outlet obstruction
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1C \> 9%) or glucose at baseline \> 500 mg/dL or uncontrolled diabetic ketoacidosis or uncontrolled hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome
* Decompensated liver cirrhosis (LC) - Known LC with ascites or diuretic use or hepatic encephalopathy or varix
* End-stage renal disease receiving renal replacement therapy
* Uncontrolled Heart failure (regardless of LVEF)
* Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
* Patients with the following conditions within 30 days prior to randomization:
1. History of cardiac surgery excluding PCA, acute myocardial infarction, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, and admission for heart failure
2. Uncontrolled increase of intracranial pressure
* The subjects judged by investigators to have difficulty continuing the trial were also excluded.
* The case the subjects does not consent to the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sejoong Kim, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital
Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Qian Q. Hypernatremia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):432-434. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12141018. Epub 2019 Feb 6. No abstract available.
Chauhan K, Pattharanitima P, Patel N, Duffy A, Saha A, Chaudhary K, Debnath N, Van Vleck T, Chan L, Nadkarni GN, Coca SG. Rate of Correction of Hypernatremia and Health Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 May 7;14(5):656-663. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10640918. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
Hillier TA, Abbott RD, Barrett EJ. Hyponatremia: evaluating the correction factor for hyperglycemia. Am J Med. 1999 Apr;106(4):399-403. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00055-8.
Adrogue HJ, Madias NE. Hypernatremia. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1493-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422006. No abstract available.
Sterns RH. Evidence for Managing Hypernatremia: Is It Just Hyponatremia in Reverse? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 May 7;14(5):645-647. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02950319. Epub 2019 Apr 4. No abstract available.
Cabassi A, Tedeschi S. Severity of community acquired hypernatremia is an independent predictor of mortality: a matter of water balance and rate of correction. Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;12(7):909-911. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1693-x. Epub 2017 Jul 1. No abstract available.
Lindner G, Funk GC. Hypernatremia in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2013 Apr;28(2):216.e11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
Bataille S, Baralla C, Torro D, Buffat C, Berland Y, Alazia M, Loundou A, Michelet P, Vacher-Coponat H. Undercorrection of hypernatremia is frequent and associated with mortality. BMC Nephrol. 2014 Feb 21;15:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-37.
Alshayeb HM, Showkat A, Babar F, Mangold T, Wall BM. Severe hypernatremia correction rate and mortality in hospitalized patients. Am J Med Sci. 2011 May;341(5):356-60. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31820a3a90.
Sterns RH, Silver SM. Salt and water: read the package insert. QJM. 2003 Aug;96(8):549-52. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg102. No abstract available.
Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, Annane D, Ball S, Bichet D, Decaux G, Fenske W, Hoorn EJ, Ichai C, Joannidis M, Soupart A, Zietse R, Haller M, van der Veer S, Van Biesen W, Nagler E; Hyponatraemia Guideline Development Group. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014 Feb 25;170(3):G1-47. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-1020. Print 2014 Mar.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B-2104-680-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.