The Effects of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Approach
NCT ID: NCT04948073
Last Updated: 2022-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-24
2022-04-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DNS vs Thoracic Stabilization Exercises in Thoracic Kyphosis
NCT07255794
Effectiveness of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Breathing Exercises With Schroth in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
NCT06682702
Comparison of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises and Deep Cervical Muscle Exercises on Muscle Fat Infiltration in Individuals With Neck Pain
NCT06891391
Cervical and Lumbal Region Muscle Architecture in Individuals With Low Back and Neck Pain
NCT05206136
Remotely Spinal Stabilization Exercises in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain
NCT04691024
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group
The experimental group will follow a DNS exercise protocol based on previous procedure for a whole period of 6 weeks (three 50-min sessions per week) in addition the conventional treatment. DNS group's protocol will involve 5 min warm-up, 40 min DNS movements (4 different parts, each part lasts for 10 min) accompanied with breathing exercises, and 5 min cool-down. DNS exercises will include diaphragmatic breathing, Baby Rock, Rolling, Side Lying, Oblique Sit, Tripod, Kneeling, Squat, Prone, and Czech Get Up (CGU). Week one specifically will involve training and practicing basic DNS exercises. The complexity of the exercises will increase gradually by adding a new task to an already practiced task every week. An increase in the complexity of a task will help the performer to automate performance. We will use the dual-task paradigm to examine if the task is automated or not (e.g. no new task should disturb the diaphragmatic breathing).
Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach
The experimental group will follow a DNS exercise protocol based on previous procedure for a whole period of 6 weeks (three 50-min sessions per week) in addition the conventional treatment.
Control Group
Patients from both groups will receive a conventional 6-week treatment programme (18 treatment sessions, three a week, for 30-40min duration). All patients will also continue their usual activities and receive advices related to the daily living activites in the form of a leaflet. Participants will be asked to refrain from seeking any other types of rehabilitation treatments during the trial. The conventional physical therapy program for both groups includes: TENS therapy for the low back (15 min 3 days/week), with a frequency of 100 Hz and fixed pulse; ultrasound for 5 minutes, 1 Hz, continuous mode of application 1.5 w/cm2. The exercise programs will consist strengthening, stretching exercises for the abdominal, back, pelvic, and lower limb muscles.
Conventional treatment
Patients from both groups will receive a conventional 6-week treatment programme (18 treatment sessions, three a week, for 30-40min duration).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach
The experimental group will follow a DNS exercise protocol based on previous procedure for a whole period of 6 weeks (three 50-min sessions per week) in addition the conventional treatment.
Conventional treatment
Patients from both groups will receive a conventional 6-week treatment programme (18 treatment sessions, three a week, for 30-40min duration).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To have a pain intensity of at least 3 points (measured on a 0-10 point Visual Analog Scale (VAS);
* The ability to comprehend and follow verbal instructions,
* To be over 65 years of age,
* To volunteer to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* severe spinal pathologies (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis, lumbar spinal stenosis, spina bifida, spinal tumors, osteoporosis, and cauda equina syndrome)
* medical contraindications to active exercise;
* concomitant somatic or psychiatric disorder \[Mini-Mental State Examination score ≤24\]
* neurological deficits (e.g. brain tumor and nerve palsies); specific causes of LBP (e.g. facet joint problem, disc herniation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction)
* nerve root compression
* spinal deformities
* autoimmune diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus)
* cancer
65 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Caner Karartı
Caner Karartı, Hacettepe University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kırşehir Ahi Evran University
Kırşehir, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kolar P, Sulc J, Kyncl M, Sanda J, Cakrt O, Andel R, Kumagai K, Kobesova A. Postural function of the diaphragm in persons with and without chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;42(4):352-62. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3830. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
Scott S, Fuld JP, Carter R, McEntegart M, MacFarlane NG. Diaphragm ultrasonography as an alternative to whole-body plethysmography in pulmonary function testing. J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Feb;25(2):225-32. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.2.225.
Kolar P, Neuwirth J, Sanda J, Suchanek V, Svata Z, Volejnik J, Pivec M. Analysis of diaphragm movement during tidal breathing and during its activation while breath holding using MRI synchronized with spirometry. Physiol Res. 2009;58(3):383-392. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.931376. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
Kolar P, Sulc J, Kyncl M, Sanda J, Neuwirth J, Bokarius AV, Kriz J, Kobesova A. Stabilizing function of the diaphragm: dynamic MRI and synchronized spirometric assessment. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Oct;109(4):1064-71. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01216.2009. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
Mahdieh L, Zolaktaf V, Karimi MT. Effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) training on functional movements. Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Apr;70:102568. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102568. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
Son MS, Jung DH, You JSH, Yi CH, Jeon HS, Cha YJ. Effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization on diaphragm movement, postural control, balance and gait performance in cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(4):739-746. doi: 10.3233/NRE-172155.
Yoon HS, Cha YJ, You JSH. Effects of dynamic core-postural chain stabilization on diaphragm movement, abdominal muscle thickness, and postural control in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized control trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(3):381-389. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192983.
Inani SB, Selkar SP. Effect of core stabilization exercises versus conventional exercises on pain and functional status in patients with non-specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0348.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021500
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.