The Effects of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Approach

NCT ID: NCT04948073

Last Updated: 2022-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-24

Study Completion Date

2022-04-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When the positive effects of the recently popular "Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS)" approach are examined, it suggests that it may be a possible treatment option in geriatric individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CSNLP). Based on the principles of developmental kinesiology, the DNS approach takes advantage of infants' motor development curves in the treatment of motor disorders. The main focus is on regulating intra-abdominal pressure and the integrated spinal stabilizing system (ISSS) through specific functional exercises based on the positions exhibited by a healthy infant. According to the DNS, every developmental position is an exercise position, but every exercise must follow basic principles. These principles are restoration of correct respiratory pattern and intra-abdominal pressure, respectively; ensuring correct support during dynamic activities of the extremities and ensuring biomechanical alignment during movement. Considering the principles of exercise, there appears to be a potential mechanism of action for anomalies in geriatric individuals with CNSLBP. Therefore, in our study, we aimed to examine the effect of DNS approach on functional movement patterns, balance, quality of life and exercise capacity in geriatric individuals with CNSLBP. It is the first randomized controlled study in the literature, and our hypothesis is that the DNS approach may be an effective therapeutic approach on these parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It has been reported that during isometric upper and lower extremity flexion exercises in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CSNLP), the mobility of the diaphragm decreases, especially in the anterior-middle portions. The regulation of intra-abdominal pressure is impaired due to insufficient mobility of the diaphragm and causes compressive forces on the vertebrae due to the compensatory activity of the superficial spinal extensors. Muscle imbalance between the upper and lower quadrants also results in an abnormal position of the chest or rib cage, negatively affecting lung function and exercise capacity. When the positive effects of the recently popular "Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS)" approach are examined, it suggests that it may be a possible treatment option in geriatric individuals with CSNLP. Based on the principles of developmental kinesiology, the DNS approach takes advantage of infants' motor development curves in the treatment of motor disorders. The main focus is on regulating intra-abdominal pressure and the integrated spinal stabilizing system through specific functional exercises based on the positions exhibited by a healthy infant. According to the DNS, every developmental position is an exercise position, but every exercise must follow basic principles. These principles are restoration of correct respiratory pattern and intra-abdominal pressure, respectively; ensuring correct support during dynamic activities of the extremities and ensuring biomechanical alignment during movement. Considering the principles of exercise, there appears to be a potential mechanism of action for anomalies in geriatric individuals with CNSLBP. Therefore, in our study, we aimed to examine the effect of DNS approach on functional movement patterns, balance, quality of life and exercise capacity in geriatric individuals with CNSLBP. It is the first randomized controlled study in the literature, and our hypothesis is that the DNS approach may be an effective therapeutic approach on these parameters.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain Rehabilitation Treatment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
the blinded assessor

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group

The experimental group will follow a DNS exercise protocol based on previous procedure for a whole period of 6 weeks (three 50-min sessions per week) in addition the conventional treatment. DNS group's protocol will involve 5 min warm-up, 40 min DNS movements (4 different parts, each part lasts for 10 min) accompanied with breathing exercises, and 5 min cool-down. DNS exercises will include diaphragmatic breathing, Baby Rock, Rolling, Side Lying, Oblique Sit, Tripod, Kneeling, Squat, Prone, and Czech Get Up (CGU). Week one specifically will involve training and practicing basic DNS exercises. The complexity of the exercises will increase gradually by adding a new task to an already practiced task every week. An increase in the complexity of a task will help the performer to automate performance. We will use the dual-task paradigm to examine if the task is automated or not (e.g. no new task should disturb the diaphragmatic breathing).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach

Intervention Type OTHER

The experimental group will follow a DNS exercise protocol based on previous procedure for a whole period of 6 weeks (three 50-min sessions per week) in addition the conventional treatment.

Control Group

Patients from both groups will receive a conventional 6-week treatment programme (18 treatment sessions, three a week, for 30-40min duration). All patients will also continue their usual activities and receive advices related to the daily living activites in the form of a leaflet. Participants will be asked to refrain from seeking any other types of rehabilitation treatments during the trial. The conventional physical therapy program for both groups includes: TENS therapy for the low back (15 min 3 days/week), with a frequency of 100 Hz and fixed pulse; ultrasound for 5 minutes, 1 Hz, continuous mode of application 1.5 w/cm2. The exercise programs will consist strengthening, stretching exercises for the abdominal, back, pelvic, and lower limb muscles.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients from both groups will receive a conventional 6-week treatment programme (18 treatment sessions, three a week, for 30-40min duration).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach

The experimental group will follow a DNS exercise protocol based on previous procedure for a whole period of 6 weeks (three 50-min sessions per week) in addition the conventional treatment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional treatment

Patients from both groups will receive a conventional 6-week treatment programme (18 treatment sessions, three a week, for 30-40min duration).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being an older patient seeking care for CNSLBP (with a duration of at least 3 months) without leg pain.
* To have a pain intensity of at least 3 points (measured on a 0-10 point Visual Analog Scale (VAS);
* The ability to comprehend and follow verbal instructions,
* To be over 65 years of age,
* To volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* history of spinal surgery
* severe spinal pathologies (e.g. ankylosing spondylitis, lumbar spinal stenosis, spina bifida, spinal tumors, osteoporosis, and cauda equina syndrome)
* medical contraindications to active exercise;
* concomitant somatic or psychiatric disorder \[Mini-Mental State Examination score ≤24\]
* neurological deficits (e.g. brain tumor and nerve palsies); specific causes of LBP (e.g. facet joint problem, disc herniation, sacroiliac joint dysfunction)
* nerve root compression
* spinal deformities
* autoimmune diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus)
* cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Caner Karartı

Caner Karartı, Hacettepe University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kırşehir Ahi Evran University

Kırşehir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kolar P, Sulc J, Kyncl M, Sanda J, Cakrt O, Andel R, Kumagai K, Kobesova A. Postural function of the diaphragm in persons with and without chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;42(4):352-62. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3830. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22236541 (View on PubMed)

Scott S, Fuld JP, Carter R, McEntegart M, MacFarlane NG. Diaphragm ultrasonography as an alternative to whole-body plethysmography in pulmonary function testing. J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Feb;25(2):225-32. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.2.225.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16439786 (View on PubMed)

Kolar P, Neuwirth J, Sanda J, Suchanek V, Svata Z, Volejnik J, Pivec M. Analysis of diaphragm movement during tidal breathing and during its activation while breath holding using MRI synchronized with spirometry. Physiol Res. 2009;58(3):383-392. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.931376. Epub 2008 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18637703 (View on PubMed)

Kolar P, Sulc J, Kyncl M, Sanda J, Neuwirth J, Bokarius AV, Kriz J, Kobesova A. Stabilizing function of the diaphragm: dynamic MRI and synchronized spirometric assessment. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Oct;109(4):1064-71. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01216.2009. Epub 2010 Aug 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20705944 (View on PubMed)

Mahdieh L, Zolaktaf V, Karimi MT. Effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization (DNS) training on functional movements. Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Apr;70:102568. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.102568. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31950895 (View on PubMed)

Son MS, Jung DH, You JSH, Yi CH, Jeon HS, Cha YJ. Effects of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization on diaphragm movement, postural control, balance and gait performance in cerebral palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(4):739-746. doi: 10.3233/NRE-172155.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29254112 (View on PubMed)

Yoon HS, Cha YJ, You JSH. Effects of dynamic core-postural chain stabilization on diaphragm movement, abdominal muscle thickness, and postural control in patients with subacute stroke: A randomized control trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(3):381-389. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192983.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32250328 (View on PubMed)

Inani SB, Selkar SP. Effect of core stabilization exercises versus conventional exercises on pain and functional status in patients with non-specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0348.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23411647 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021500

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.